First off, I'd like to reiterate the appreciation others have directed to Fuse for reaching out to Terk, and to Terk for adjusting clevermining's algorithms. It's nice to see changes were made with both cleverminng's and Guldencoin's best interests in mind. Hopefully no more 4+ hour gaps in the blockchain.
I ran a few queries against the Abe database to see what % of newly created NLG blocks were being mined by Gf7wGA. The results are cut and paste below. I found them interesting so figured I'd share. Disclaimer: I'm not a developer and still figuring out Abe's schema, so take these results with a few grains of salt. I did manually check the Sept 17 results against explorer.guldencoin.com and the numbers matched up. --Mark
+------------------------------------------+
| NLG blocks per day |
+---------+---------+----------------------+
| date | total # | Gf7wGA # | Gf7wGA % |
+---------+---------+-----------+----------+
| Aug 15 | 582 | 0 | 0% |
| Aug 16 | 571 | 0 | 0% |
| Aug 17 | 596 | 107 | 17.95% |
| Aug 18 | 567 | 350 | 61.73% |
| Aug 19 | 578 | 385 | 66.61% |
| Aug 20 | 583 | 320 | 54.89% |
| Aug 21 | 598 | 312 | 52.17% |
| Aug 22 | 569 | 380 | 66.78% |
| Aug 23 | 577 | 398 | 68.98% |
| Aug 24 | 557 | 362 | 64.99% |
| Aug 25 | 585 | 387 | 66.15% |
| Aug 26 | 568 | 371 | 65.32% |
| Aug 27 | 576 | 356 | 61.81% |
| Aug 28 | 582 | 369 | 63.40% |
| Aug 29 | 570 | 367 | 64.39% |
| Aug 30 | 577 | 366 | 63.43% |
| Aug 31 | 581 | 367 | 63.17% |
+---------+---------+-----------+----------+
| Sept 01 | 573 | 333 | 58.12% |
| Sept 02 | 616 | 429 | 69.64% |
| Sept 03 | 604 | 448 | 74.17% |
| Sept 04 | 577 | 503 | 87.18% |
| Sept 05 | 595 | 517 | 86.89% |
| Sept 06 | 526 | 473 | 89.92% |
| Sept 07 | 593 | 518 | 87.35% |
| Sept 08 | 572 | 485 | 84.79% |
| Sept 09 | 574 | 443 | 77.18% |
| Sept 10 | 597 | 536 | 89.78% |
| Sept 11 | 552 | 444 | 80.43% |
| Sept 12 | 596 | 480 | 80.54% |
| Sept 13 | 524 | 450 | 85.88% |
| Sept 14 | 603 | 511 | 84.74% |
| Sept 15 | 589 | 555 | 94.23% |
| Sept 16 | 572 | 542 | 94.76% |
| Sept 17 | 63 | 55 | 87.30% |
+---------+---------+-----------+----------+
Nice. See no mistake here.
My results were about the same in the post on September 08, 2014, 11:22:02 AM. I screen scraped the data from the chainexplorer with timezone +2.00 and calculated the % against the average found blocks per day. You took the actual found blocks to calculate the %. That's more accurate.
I like to have a site like
https://blockchain.info/pools.
And ... a charts with the longest time between blocks per day. I'm willing to donate to the one that finds that block.