Topic: Nano is better than Bitcoin! Do you hold any? (Read 752 times)
Well I always say its a choice. One will consider Nano as the best or better than bitcoin but I'll prefer bitcoin to nano because bitcoin is the first cryptocurrency which existed till the other coins came into existence. Sometimes I just don't comprehend those who compare nano to bitcoin. I believe they have a reason.
No altcoin can be better than BTC, and so is NANO. NANO can have faster transaction speeds than BTC, and the cost is cheaper than BTC. But those things cannot help NANO better than BTC. BTC is always the best and only cryptocurrency in this market
lol, I like how simple and straightforward your post is.
And, yes, nano is better.
Once you use it, you just never go back.
You really start to wonder why you ever bothered with fees or confirmation times at all.
The thing is, btc is where the store of value is.
So I do have quite a bit of nano that I actually use for transactions (typically, if someone asks for btc for a service or transaction they will almost always accept nano if you just ask).
But most of my profit has been from btc.
I used to make quite a bit flipping icos, but that's just not possible anymore.
So I grow capital using btc only for now.
And, yes, nano is better.
Once you use it, you just never go back.
You really start to wonder why you ever bothered with fees or confirmation times at all.
The thing is, btc is where the store of value is.
So I do have quite a bit of nano that I actually use for transactions (typically, if someone asks for btc for a service or transaction they will almost always accept nano if you just ask).
But most of my profit has been from btc.
I used to make quite a bit flipping icos, but that's just not possible anymore.
So I grow capital using btc only for now.
I agree that Nano is a great crypto currency and it is also much faster and cheaper than BTC, but it is not better. Only technically, when you look at TPS than yes, but you need to see the whole picture and BTC power over all other cryptos.
People who are comparing Nano to bitcoin, they need to first of all consider the capacity of NANO first, can Nano really hold the transaction of bitcoin? What will really test Nano if they will still remain same if they get the same amount of transaction and community like bitcoin? I wish bitcoin could just pause for one day and then transfer its database for Nano to handle; you will see how bad Nano will get with their speed and even with their transaction fee.Although I wish that satoshi can just expand the capacity of bitcoin and then have a technology that will make it to speed up because we might still get a slower speed as people come on it more to make their transaction for different purposes, but even with that, I still prefer bitcoin over other coins.
I have a strange experience with NANO.
I came to know about RAIblocks, it was a limited coin so I thought it was a good coin to invest and bought some on it's own exchange and holded there.
The price only decreased for the 6 months I hold so I decided to sell it to limit my loss. But a few months after my selling, Raiblocks renamed itself as NANO and started to increase in price. NANO certainly is a better coin to use for transactions but their history too is not free of some shady behaviors.
I came to know about RAIblocks, it was a limited coin so I thought it was a good coin to invest and bought some on it's own exchange and holded there.
The price only decreased for the 6 months I hold so I decided to sell it to limit my loss. But a few months after my selling, Raiblocks renamed itself as NANO and started to increase in price. NANO certainly is a better coin to use for transactions but their history too is not free of some shady behaviors.
You are comparing nano with bitcoin whose dominance is nearly 68% of the whole market and nano have just .05% share and it is not comparable. It can be compared with some altcoin as no coin have shown ability to compare it with bitcoin till now.
In the electricity market there are no coins that have greater copper than Bitcoin, so bitcoin is still the most successful coin at the moment.
As you know Bitcoin is prime altcoin and don't think this will be old and nano will future, you will see Bitcoin will be future and all other altcoin will follow Bitcoin, as the people paying BTC fees but just some people using Nano.
No altcoin can be better than BTC, and so is NANO. NANO can have faster transaction speeds than BTC, and the cost is cheaper than BTC. But those things cannot help NANO better than BTC. BTC is always the best and only cryptocurrency in this market
I'm also a big supporter of Nano I have seen Nano goIng from 100 sats each to $15 each in the market, Checking their stat we can see also has a huge percentage of profitability,
Bitcoin ROI 8,305.48%
Nano ROI > 9000%
But when it comes to adoption and volume it's still Bitcoin, Bitcoin now has over 70% dominance over altcoins, Nano will have its time but we should all rally for Bitcoin now.
Right now I'm accumulating Banano, who knows there could be a repeat of Nano in the future, Banano is a fork of Nano, since they have the same features, there's a possibility of a repeat, it is now trading at 1 cent to 1 BANANO.
Lol, funny comparison buddie.
Nano is good but nowhere compared to bitcoin, bitcoin has passed through challenges, passed through tough government policies, overcame financial institutions' criticism and still stands tall, as it stands today, every other cryptocurrencies are standing because bitcoin stood and is still standing.
Nano is good but nowhere compared to bitcoin, bitcoin has passed through challenges, passed through tough government policies, overcame financial institutions' criticism and still stands tall, as it stands today, every other cryptocurrencies are standing because bitcoin stood and is still standing.
I agree that Nano is a great crypto currency and it is also much faster and cheaper than BTC, but it is not better. Only technically, when you look at TPS than yes, but you need to see the whole picture and BTC power over all other cryptos.
full member
Activity: 882
Merit: 102
PayAccept - Worldwide payments accepted in seconds
Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
Because, every altcoin has newer technology, but these technologies are not tested enough. They're not safe enough. So there are more problems that possible profit. Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
Comparing bitcoin to nano is not it all the way as the two are two different coin , bitcoin has the first of it kind is still very much concern for mistake which the new ones are looking into to build their own chain , so due to this I will say bitcoin is still the best for maintaining that fee .
Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
Nano project is not the only coin that has better tech than bitcoin,we have many good altcoins that are better than bitcoin tech but old is gold,bitcoin is just more favoured by investors and community than any altcoins so dont compare nano with bitcoin,nano cant withstand what bitcoin went through,i dont invest in nano but i have better altcoins in my portfolio thats better than nano,crypto space is big world full of good and bad altcoins Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
the argument is pretty vague. There would be no Nano is if there was no Bitcoin. It is the king of crypto. Transaction fee is higher because its price is very high. Nano does have a higher speed as compared to Bitcoin, but in value, investors trust Bitcoin more than any other coin, so I am happy with BTC.
Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
obviously different if you equate nano with bitcoin. Although bitcoin is expensive bitcoin is very popular with the largest volume and clear concept, it is only natural that the exchange is more than nano. you can't compare nano with bitcoin.Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
obviously different if you equate nano with bitcoin. Although bitcoin is expensive bitcoin is very popular with the largest volume and clear concept, it is only natural that the exchange is more than nano. you can't compare nano with bitcoin. Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
Even there are more altcoins or tokens that have much faster transaction speed, and more powerful capacity to solve and confirm transactions, bitcoin is a unique one. It is a founder (I think we can call bitcoin like this), the grandfather of crypto currencies. In brief, I don't think we should compare bitcoin with any other crypto currencies, not only NANO. Better than bitcoin, but what for? Because we don't need anything to replace bitcoin.
BestAltcoinHunter, tell us more in detail than you were so attracted by the Nano technology that you decided to advise us of this cryptocurrency.
Bitcoin is a crypto dispersed and a worldwide network. Bitcoin's value has been validated over the years and the Bitcoin community is bigger than any other crypto. Bitcoin is unique, cannot be banned by any country. Bitcoin represents the will of the people of the whole world, a symbol of independence, freedom and happiness. All investors want to own multiple bitcoin.
And Nano is better in technology, but history and community are not comparable to Bitcoin.
And Nano is better in technology, but history and community are not comparable to Bitcoin.
Jump to: