Did anyone buy nano when it came out and it was 0.01? How would anyone even know about new coins that just came out?
I took a look and at the highest point, it hit 37 dollars. So let someone spent $1000 and bought 100000 nano. By the time nano hit 1 dollar, which is 100x... that $1000 is now $1,000,000. Then it hit 20 dollars and was around those prices for a short while. So basically when it was 20 dollars, 100000 nano is worth over 2 million dollars.
Has there been any coins recently that ever went this high? I mean even right now nano is over 1 dollar. Anyone that bought it at 1 cent and never sold it... its still over 100x when it came out. That mean 1000 dollars worth of 100000 nano is still worth 100,000 usd. That is amazing.
Topic: Nano is better than Bitcoin! Do you hold any? - page 3. (Read 794 times)
Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
I can mention over ten blockchain coins that claims or atleast is faster than bitcoin in scalability and cheaper but It seems most of you fans boys don't really get it a times. Bitcoin is king, all altcoins are built on it. It's value is omniscience and no altcoin can usurp its position in the cryptocurrency market
You are right though and I agree with you to an extent. Nano is good, no argument on that but what makes you think it will last long term just like Bitcoin has done? There have been many projects who said they will beat Bitcoin but they are no where to be found. There are also some which offered high TPS but yet Bitcoin is still king. People believes in Bitcoin because it has stand the test of time amidst all challenges.
Nano is a good coin, no doubt, but I already lost some money because nano
I lost coins with Bitgrail and then I buy a few coins in ATH
So I prefer to invest in BTC and ETH
At the moment I'm not holding any nano in my portfolio
I lost coins with Bitgrail and then I buy a few coins in ATH
So I prefer to invest in BTC and ETH
At the moment I'm not holding any nano in my portfolio
Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
So you can live with your Nano no need to to buy any more Bitcoins. Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
If you think you are still need to buy Bitcoin to ensure the security of your funds in future then this can be the answer for your own question no need to convince anyone here anymore.
maybe nano is good but it can beat or replace bitcoin because bitcoin is the father of all no matter what the new technologies come but bitcoin remains on the top.
I dont think NANO is better than bitcoin, and i dont think it would happen, yes i know that NANO has a lot of improvements compared to bitcoin, but i would still stick to bitcoin,because it is easy to liquidate compared to NANO, we have our own local exchanger here in the Philippines but they dont accept NANO that is the reason why i dont buy this coin, but maybe in the long run i could, we never know.
LOL another delusional newbie who has read some altcoin advertisement online and now thinks he has found some "superior" and "new" technology compared to bitcoin while not knowing that majority of altcoins are exact copies of bitcoin and the things they change always lead to less security and serious flaws in them.
investment-wise, since that is what OP is interested in, NANO is a terrible investment because of its huge supply that has no control and is on the boarder of being unlimited and that gives it such a huge inflation.
not to mention that in all these years that it has existed, it doesn't even have a single real adoption case. how can it be so much better as OP claims and still be useless?
investment-wise, since that is what OP is interested in, NANO is a terrible investment because of its huge supply that has no control and is on the boarder of being unlimited and that gives it such a huge inflation.
not to mention that in all these years that it has existed, it doesn't even have a single real adoption case. how can it be so much better as OP claims and still be useless?
Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
I should have not sold all Mrai if I knew they are to evolve to something as great as their current position they are now on the 46th position in the market and with price at $1.13 cents this is a huge jump from only a pennies per mrai, but I don't like the comparison, I think Bitcoin is the superior coin because it started the revolution, maybe Nano will soon have it's own time.
I never hold Nano coins because I have no proper information of the whole platform, and I think this is also a regular altcoin next to bitcoin and ethereum. When they said it's bettee with bitcoin, well it's their impression and commendable comments. Bitcoin holding still the one I prefer to, and I won't think any other options unless btc price stabilized at very high value.
same bro, I always follow what is being traded in the market, most people will override the features and reliability of coins. Even if I compare, monero is better than nano, but finally what I hold is bitcoin, eth, bnb, xrp, etc. Now people are more concerned with profits, they don't care about the technology that exists in every coin.
All you have to say is true, Nano outperforms BTC in technology, but let's look at the fact that People will be crazy about BTC and not Nano or other coins, the coins that are called will replace BTC
Bitcoin is much older than Nano so I would think that Bitcoin has more people interested in helping with the development of BTC.Nano may not be able to out perform Bitcoin in the long-run.
All you have to say is true, Nano outperforms BTC in technology, but let's look at the fact that People will be crazy about BTC and not Nano or other coins, the coins that are called will replace BTC
Nano is faster!
Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
Bitcoin is slower.
Nano has no fees, you send 1 Nano you get 1 Nano!
Bitcoin has massive fees, you send 0.01 Bitcoin you get 0.0097 Bitcoin.
Nano has superior tech!
Bitcoin is outdated.
Nano is the future!
Bitcoin is the past.
Why aren't you holding any nano?
In nano do you mean Xem blockchain/token ?
The blockchain is an embarrassment to the blockchain world; it is not easy to use
Neither does it’s app work functionally
Nem is overrated; and is not anything closer to xlm
Nano may indeed have some advantages compared to Bitcoin. But the question is "can Nano be more valuable than Bitcoin?". As we know that the value of cryptocurrency here is very important and interesting to understand. Even though BTC fees are very large and there are some other disadvantages, it is still proven that most people are more trusting and interested in having BTC. Personally, I don't hold Nano yet so far.
You have really taken time to state the good features of nano and that's wonderful. Let me ask, why was Ethereum, Litecoin etc created? Most think they can beat Bitcoin on the long run, but where are they? Bitcoin passed through challenges and today it is highly valuable, that is to say, the tougher days only strengthened Bitcoin. Let me ask again, how many year has Nano lasted? Ethereum with all its team is yet to beat Bitcoin all these years, now it's Nano.
However, it will be hard for any coin to beat Bitcoin not after paving the way for them.
However, it will be hard for any coin to beat Bitcoin not after paving the way for them.
Adoption is one major difference for most of the altcoins as compared to bitcoin. The popularity of usage is incomparable when it comes to bitcoin. Nano might have the best features but how many users are actively using Nano as compared to bitcoin? If you say crypto to an ordinary individual, what comes to his mind first? Bitcoin or Nano? Come to think of it...
You have really taken time to state the good features of nano and that's wonderful. Let me ask, why was Ethereum, Litecoin etc created? Most think they can beat Bitcoin on the long run, but where are they? Bitcoin passed through challenges and today it is highly valuable, that is to say, the tougher days only strengthened Bitcoin. Let me ask again, how many year has Nano lasted? Ethereum with all its team is yet to beat Bitcoin all these years, now it's Nano.
However, it will be hard for any coin to beat Bitcoin not after paving the way for them.
However, it will be hard for any coin to beat Bitcoin not after paving the way for them.
price of Nano doesn't look like its one of the best coin to jump right into. look how much it got during the bull run, it reaches up to $26 and yet now its down to $1. you gotta be that patient to hold them for too long since the time bears came. but its all up to you, i wouldn't mind holding if i just got it for free. but it doesn't matter if fees are that low, to me its the value that makes it worth keeping.
Nano could be a coin with potential amd good development team that doesn't make it a match to bitcoin not to talk of being better than bitcoin, i see this as an overstatement.
The market decides what is better. And so far, it has been Bitcoin. All the way along.
Nano is not a bad project. And there are many projects with features that are better than Bitcoin's. But none of the projects have the features that has been valued to 200B.
Nano is not a bad project. And there are many projects with features that are better than Bitcoin's. But none of the projects have the features that has been valued to 200B.
nano was a project that was not too serious but because the community is now nano can be one of the projects that really started from the bottom and managed to continue to grow rapidly.
Yeah from last one year nano is doing really good job. Their team members are working continuously. I following this coin from long time and I hope this coin have a bright future. Jump to: