Author

Topic: 📈 NastyFans: The Bitcoin Enthusiast Fan Club (est. 2012) - page 139. (Read 959523 times)

hero member
Activity: 633
Merit: 591
Distribution 255103 is complete.

We appreciate the donations. Thank you!
sr. member
Activity: 766
Merit: 250
The P2Pool software running on nastyfans.org is a unmodified P2Pool node and it does not charge any fees. But there are plans to make changes to benefit nastyfans. I will announce these changes when they are ready. Until then it is a normal P2Pool node.

I can't wait to see the fruits of your labor!  Thanks for your service Nonnakip!
hero member
Activity: 633
Merit: 591
To help with price concerns, have you perhaps considered changing how seat sales are done?  Perhaps instead of storing an order book of seats for sale you store an order book of seats wanting to be purchased?  This might help motivate higher prices as you change the dynamic from seat sellers competing to seat purchasers competing....

Interesting idea. But it require buyer pre-pay for seat purchase. This makes nastyfans a bank. I do not want to run a bank. We already talk about this here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1477150
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Mining on the NastyFans P2Pool Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 275
Merit: 250
yeah I had to dump my position some weeks ago. it is being run way too passively.

going green? good luck competing..  

what´s next, a drum circle? Wink
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 500
I'm a late-comer, and now I start to understand why many people where saying NastyMining is very well run - because it is! Admittedly I haven't looked into a lot of mining ventures, but from the ones I had a close eye on, you certainly set yourself apart for how you manage this Smiley

I personally would've let my feelings steer me away from BFL, I really dislike their behaviour, but I admit your business reasoning seems solid, and you surely have much more experience than me. So I'll keep my seats tight for the foreseeable future Smiley

Concur, Nasty mining is an outstanding operation!

EDIT: (OgN/Nona)To help with price concerns, have you perhaps considered changing how seat sales are done?  Perhaps instead of storing an order book of seats for sale you store an order book of seats wanting to be purchased?  This might help motivate higher prices as you change the dynamic from seat sellers competing to seat purchasers competing....
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1005
Having mining equipment compared to not having mining equipment should be a more significant factor in your planning.

As Og stated, heat is a major consideration. There's also a strong likelihood that first-gen ASICs will barely cover power costs by the end of the year.

The only realistic option to sustain long-term operation is to move to second-gen hardware. Despite the PR disaster BFL is, the fact remains that they have delivered, and early orders do reasonably well. The FPGA history also shows they will probably move smoothly with the second round.

Whether 28nm hardware pays itself off remains to be seen, but again - it's the only viable choice.
legendary
Activity: 947
Merit: 1008
central banking = outdated protocol
Those of us who have been around since the beginning know that trustworthiness, long term vision, and doing what is best to truly support bitcoin is what you are looking for in your BTC earning relationships. Live long and prosper Nastyfans!
full member
Activity: 227
Merit: 100
Seen the latest asicminer price cuts?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3030092
"Hashrate: baseline 10GHash/s, rated 10.752GHash/s, maximum 12.829GHash/s with overclocking and proper cooling"
For 5.99 BTC

I hope he orderd 100 of those...  BFL is never going to deliver

The blind love for BFl was the reason I sold my shares.  It nasty buys these I may jump back on

I would have to buy over 500 of those in order to come close to matching our BFL order.  The power inefficiency difference along with the massive additional heat dispersion and administration time required just doesn't make asicminer blades a viable option.

Having mining equipment compared to not having mining equipment should be a more significant factor in your planning.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Seen the latest asicminer price cuts?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3030092
"Hashrate: baseline 10GHash/s, rated 10.752GHash/s, maximum 12.829GHash/s with overclocking and proper cooling"
For 5.99 BTC

I hope he orderd 100 of those...  BFL is never going to deliver

The blind love for BFl was the reason I sold my shares.  It nasty buys these I may jump back on

I would have to buy over 500 of those in order to come close to matching our BFL order.  The power inefficiency difference along with the massive additional heat dispersion and administration time required just doesn't make asicminer blades a viable option.
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 10




The blind love for BFl was the reason I sold my shares.  It nasty buys these I may jump back on

Same sold at .44
hero member
Activity: 887
Merit: 1000
Seen the latest asicminer price cuts?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3030092
"Hashrate: baseline 10GHash/s, rated 10.752GHash/s, maximum 12.829GHash/s with overclocking and proper cooling"
For 5.99 BTC

I hope he orderd 100 of those...  BFL is never going to deliver

The blind love for BFl was the reason I sold my shares.  It nasty buys these I may jump back on
member
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
Seen the latest asicminer price cuts?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3030092
"Hashrate: baseline 10GHash/s, rated 10.752GHash/s, maximum 12.829GHash/s with overclocking and proper cooling"
For 5.99 BTC

I hope he orderd 100 of those...  BFL is never going to deliver
hero member
Activity: 634
Merit: 500
For Sale:

Nasty Fans Pass-Through packs.

Each pack includes:

Price per pack: BTC1.5

Please see here for details.
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
OgNasty,

How long have you had your 168WX address, and is it the first one you ever had?

It looks like that address hit the blockchain on July 15th, 2011.  Not my first address, but it's the one I put in my forum signature.  Amazing the amount of BTC that has gone through there (15,218.23 BTC).  

Funny side note...  After using Bitcoin for a little while I decided to land on that address for my signature because it ended with the word "Me" and obviously at the time I was unable to generate vanity addresses.
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Seen the latest asicminer price cuts?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3030092
"Hashrate: baseline 10GHash/s, rated 10.752GHash/s, maximum 12.829GHash/s with overclocking and proper cooling"
For 5.99 BTC
hero member
Activity: 634
Merit: 500
And now for something completely different.

OgNasty,

How long have you had your 168WX address, and is it the first one you ever had?
donator
Activity: 4760
Merit: 4323
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Thanks for sharing you views, and ambitions for this project and for doing business in general.

You're welcome.

I received a couple of encouraging messages regarding my comment to begin taking steps toward renewable energy.  I went ahead and setup a BTC address to raise funds for NASTY MINING to go green.  If you would like to donate, feel free. 

1GoGreenJdqyFh3viLwE3M6ZhB1AvtDAJ2
sr. member
Activity: 353
Merit: 251
Jump to: