Pages:
Author

Topic: Need explanation from moderator who deleted my post (2) 4 days ago - page 2. (Read 555 times)

member
Activity: 169
Merit: 18
Probably because its off-topic? I mean technically it is, and if anyone thinks an ICO is a scam, it should be in scam accusations only perhaps?
Is it really off-topic? Even I didn't know that Shocked
Talking about an ICO being a scam in a bounty thread makes it off-topic, doesn't it? It would make more sense for such warning to stick to the ANN thread and its scam accusation topic. Right?

I think scam is so widespread and not everybody go to scam accusation board so it is quite fair that you attack against them in there ANN + Bounty thread.
Nothing should be considered Off-Topic when somebody is giving warning against scam.

Mods might have deleted it because it is just an accusation without a proof. Might be if you included the proof and challenged the tread creator to reply in Scam accusation board  then I do not think they will delete it.

The post that is deleted simply look accusation/threat without any proof and I think Mods are right.
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
Probably because its off-topic? I mean technically it is, and if anyone thinks an ICO is a scam, it should be in scam accusations only perhaps?
Is it really off-topic? Even I didn't know that Shocked
Talking about an ICO being a scam in a bounty thread makes it off-topic, doesn't it? It would make more sense for such warning to stick to the ANN thread and its scam accusation topic. Right?
That is hilarious.

From the same bounty 1st page(http://archive.is/9g4EL):

the most favorite  industry for  crypto  business,  I am sure that project will  collect at least soft cap,  because this subject is in demand, was in demand and will be in demand)  However, to my mind there are a lot of competitors, last of them what I met recently - Vogov,  I will support both,  this industry like a deep ocean,  all  can take  the big piece of pie.

Talking about ICO in bounty - NOT REMOVED.

~
Bumped topic within 24 hours - NOT REMOVED.

We want to make adult production great again! We want adult industry, and porn in particular, to become unbanned, widely recognized as legal. We want adult entertainment to become free of fraud, annoying ads, scams, hackers and other threats. We want HamPorn services to become reliable, widely known, highly reputed, frequently used. We want HAP tokens to become well recognized, practically used. We believe that users must be in complete anonymity & security. Only such conditions can allow for the enjoyment of the wide range of services of webcam for adults.

Bump within 24 hours + talking about ICO in bounty topic - NOT REMOVED.

So how is my post off topic and these posts and bumps are ok?



What a terrible post! Anything as bad as that should be deleted anyway - never mind what the content is.
Why is warning in bounty topic where all advertisers are bad? Scam alert is bad?
This is a discussion forum.
Have you ever seen bounty topic before?
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 2472
https://JetCash.com
What a terrible post! Anything as bad as that should be deleted anyway - never mind what the content is. This is a discussion forum.
legendary
Activity: 2383
Merit: 1551
dogs are cute.
Probably because its off-topic? I mean technically it is, and if anyone thinks an ICO is a scam, it should be in scam accusations only perhaps?
Is it really off-topic? Even I didn't know that Shocked
Talking about an ICO being a scam in a bounty thread makes it off-topic, doesn't it? It would make more sense for such warning to stick to the ANN thread and its scam accusation topic. Right?
qwk
donator
Activity: 3542
Merit: 3413
Shitcoin Minimalist
Probably because its off-topic? I mean technically it is, and if anyone thinks an ICO is a scam, it should be in scam accusations only perhaps?
Is it really off-topic? Even I didn't know that Shocked
legendary
Activity: 2383
Merit: 1551
dogs are cute.
Probably because its off-topic? I mean technically it is, and if anyone thinks an ICO is a scam, it should be in scam accusations only perhaps?
legendary
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2272
Pages:
Jump to: