Negative trust with no reason - page 2.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: jackg on January 30, 2017, 06:59:02 PM

Quote from: Quickseller on January 30, 2017, 06:51:28 PM

Quote from: jackg on January 30, 2017, 06:45:01 PM

Quote from: Vod on January 30, 2017, 05:51:51 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on January 30, 2017, 04:57:53 PM

I think there is some dispute whether the keylogger is actually a virus or not.

I removed the "virus" part of the feedback.

Hahaha, the other three (words) still stand, that's good!

Quote from: Lauda on January 30, 2017, 05:22:38 PM

Distributing software that is solely intended for malicious purposes is considered 'no reason'?[ Roll Eyes

Apparently not. OP appears to only help scammers to scam not scam himself (a very weird ideology)

It appears that some people are selective about who they leave negative trust against, even when both situations are nearly identical Roll Eyes

The ponzi debate is definitely a strange one. Even the more honest can still end up taking your money because they eventually end so it's best just to stay away from them altogether.
What do you mean the situations are identical? This and that one are identical or are you referencing something else that I've missed?

The OP wrote a program that can be used to steal passwords and other similar sensitive information.
Dooglus wrote/fixed a program that is designed to steal money from others.

The OP received a negative rating from Vod, Dooglus did not....hypocrite much?

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Quickseller on January 30, 2017, 06:51:28 PM

It appears that some people are selective about who they leave negative trust against, even when both situations are nearly identical Roll Eyes

Oh Quickseller, I don't think you want to start calling other people hypocrites. Roll Eyes

jackg

copper member

Activity: 2856

Merit: 3071

https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory

Quote from: Quickseller on January 30, 2017, 06:51:28 PM

Quote from: jackg on January 30, 2017, 06:45:01 PM

Quote from: Vod on January 30, 2017, 05:51:51 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on January 30, 2017, 04:57:53 PM

I think there is some dispute whether the keylogger is actually a virus or not.

I removed the "virus" part of the feedback.

Hahaha, the other three (words) still stand, that's good!

Quote from: Lauda on January 30, 2017, 05:22:38 PM

Distributing software that is solely intended for malicious purposes is considered 'no reason'?[ Roll Eyes

Apparently not. OP appears to only help scammers to scam not scam himself (a very weird ideology)

It appears that some people are selective about who they leave negative trust against, even when both situations are nearly identical Roll Eyes

The ponzi debate is definitely a strange one. Even the more honest can still end up taking your money because they eventually end so it's best just to stay away from them altogether.
What do you mean the situations are identical? This and that one are identical or are you referencing something else that I've missed?

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Quote from: jackg on January 30, 2017, 06:45:01 PM

Quote from: Vod on January 30, 2017, 05:51:51 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on January 30, 2017, 04:57:53 PM

I think there is some dispute whether the keylogger is actually a virus or not.

I removed the "virus" part of the feedback.

Hahaha, the other three (words) still stand, that's good!

Quote from: Lauda on January 30, 2017, 05:22:38 PM

Distributing software that is solely intended for malicious purposes is considered 'no reason'?[ Roll Eyes

Apparently not. OP appears to only help scammers to scam not scam himself (a very weird ideology)

It appears that some people are selective about who they leave negative trust against, even when both situations are nearly identical Roll Eyes

jackg

copper member

Activity: 2856

Merit: 3071

https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory

Quote from: Vod on January 30, 2017, 05:51:51 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on January 30, 2017, 04:57:53 PM

I think there is some dispute whether the keylogger is actually a virus or not.

I removed the "virus" part of the feedback.

Hahaha, the other three (words) still stand, that's good!

Quote from: Lauda on January 30, 2017, 05:22:38 PM

Distributing software that is solely intended for malicious purposes is considered 'no reason'? Roll Eyes

Apparently not. OP appears to only help scammers to scam not scam himself (a very weird ideology)

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: suchmoon on January 30, 2017, 04:57:53 PM

I think there is some dispute whether the keylogger is actually a virus or not.

I removed the "virus" part of the feedback.

Lauda

legendary

Activity: 2674

Merit: 2965

Terminated.

Distributing software that is solely intended for malicious purposes is considered 'no reason'? Roll Eyes

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: Boseda on January 30, 2017, 03:39:15 PM

The user "Vod" gave me a negative trust with no reason.

Lying about "no reason" shows you show no remorse for your actions. Undecided

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: jackg on January 30, 2017, 04:55:08 PM

Speaking to Vod isn't going to do anything but increase spam in his inbox.
If that is true then the trustis definitely valid and could mean you get more negative trust as a result of this.

I think there is some dispute whether the keylogger is actually a virus or not. Speaking to Vod might help if the OP is willing to stop the activities that triggered the neg trust. In any case, it's between the OP and Vod just like any other trust issue.

jackg

copper member

Activity: 2856

Merit: 3071

https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory

Quote from: suchmoon on January 30, 2017, 04:51:03 PM

Quote from: Boseda on January 30, 2017, 03:39:15 PM

The user "Vod" gave me a negative trust with no reason.

How can I change my trust summary?

Talk to the user "Vod".

But first you should stop lying about there being "no reason". The reason is clearly stated in your trust feedback:

Wrote a keylogger virus.

Reference link:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-source-keylogger-1769689

Whether you like it or not - that's a different story, but you should not waste your and Vod's time with the "no reason" argument.

Speaking to Vod isn't going to do anything but increase spam in his inbox.
If that is true then the trustis definitely valid and could mean you get more negative trust as a result of this.

EDIT:
I checked the reference and the trust does seem quite valid. You coded a keylogger and in doing so help scams to take place, therefore, you're not much of a positive asset to this forum.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Boseda on January 30, 2017, 03:39:15 PM

The user "Vod" gave me a negative trust with no reason.

How can I change my trust summary?

Talk to the user "Vod".

But first you should stop lying about there being "no reason". The reason is clearly stated in your trust feedback:

Wrote a keylogger virus.

Reference link:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/open-source-keylogger-1769689

Whether you like it or not - that's a different story, but you should not waste your and Vod's time with the "no reason" argument.

Quickseller

copper member

Activity: 2996

Merit: 2374

Contact dooglus, Cyrus and HostFat about your concerns about the rating that Vod left you.

Boseda

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

The user "Vod" gave me a negative trust with no reason.

How can I change my trust summary?

Topic: Negative trust with no reason - page 2. (Read 1452 times)