Author

Topic: [NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement - No Envy Movement - Updates+Discussion thread - page 270. (Read 661498 times)

newbie
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
For the record, I like the community as it is. Since it has a uniquely wide breadth and depth even at this stage and I expect amazing things from the community when the time comes.

So I see there is no real issue with NEM community (and surely only imaginary fiasco). Thank you all for your supports.

Because of my work I have for a long time without the Internet
Excuse me, the original stock list yet?
If not, could you tell me what time can be announced? Thank you very much!
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
so far it looks like NEM is going to be a lot more than that.

got some evidence? eg code, anything? thx!
member
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
NEM has potential to become the silver to NXT's gold, just as LTC is the silver to BTC's gold in POW coins.

I think NEM has the potential to become the platinum to NXT's gold.

+2
Wouldn't a newer version be better? Think about cars, phones or computers.

+
It will contain most of good features already in the start
bad features removed
new users may be interested in the newer version

-
old version users may stick in *their version
new version may be late, may have difficult to get room in markets
full member
Activity: 164
Merit: 100
NEM has been waiting for a long time, what has the new progress.
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
For the record, I like the community as it is. Since it has a uniquely wide breadth and depth even at this stage and I expect amazing things from the community when the time comes.

So I see there is no real issue with NEM community (and surely only imaginary fiasco). Thank you all for your supports.


I share your view - we have already that big kind of community others are still missing.
The idea of wide distribution was a great idea.

legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000
I am not Dorian Nakamoto.
NEM, the first cryptocurrency sent using a smartwatch.

A future headline? I just read that Google has come out with Android Wear, a Android operating system for smartwatches. Smartphones, smartwatches and smart wearables are the future. The wallet can be unlocked with its internal password safe or with facial recognition (PCA, Eigenface, neural net) or with a NFC ring. The camera will read the NEM address from a QR code and the amount can be entered through its touchscreen keyboard (10-key, minuum.com etc... ).

Is it difficult to get a basic NEM wallet running on a smartwatch?
 


I love this idea to make a smartwatch/google glass NEM app.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
hitler spoof video  Grin just the thought makes me lol haha
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
This is grasping straws at a non-issue.

Only a third of stakeholders belonged to group 3 (only posted on NEM thread) but that's no indication that they're sock puppets.  There's many lurkers here who saw the message of NEM, signed up and posted to get our stake (me among them).


That being said - it was only a third of 3000.  Let's pretend only half of them are genuine sock puppets - that's still 2500ish unique persons with NEM stake, sure a lot better than NxT's distribution.

What did NEM do to piss off the NxT whales?   Huh   Someone needs to create a Hitler spoof video from the perspective of a NxT whale with an irrational hatred of NEM.

Most sock puppets are in group 1, so what is the point anyway? they got them (almost) for free. We paid.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
And even from the 500 I think half is getting refunded.  Smiley. sadly people are now only talking about price and sockpokets  Sad . This thread was so much fun before. People coming up with so many logos and ideas and such. I wish we could all go back to that phase  Smiley
member
Activity: 124
Merit: 10
Start your Own Cryptocurrency Exchange
I won't bother with precise numbers but, if you view the census, you would see that around a third of the stakeholders belongs to group 3 (inactive accounts who only posted on the NEM threads).   Not to shatter your belief system but most people don't actively post on internet forums, especially ones like BTT which can be full of 'tards and trolls (no offense intended to anyone).

Worse case scenario - half of group 3 could be sock puppets but, with there being 3000 stakeholders, that is only 500 stakes.  A distribution to 2500 real people is an unprecedented distribution without parallel.
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
For the record, I like the community as it is. Since it has a uniquely wide breadth and depth even at this stage and I expect amazing things from the community when the time comes.

So I see there is no real issue with NEM community (and surely only imaginary fiasco). Thank you all for your supports.

thanks UP for your support  Smiley.
sr. member
Activity: 602
Merit: 268
Internet of Value
For the record, I like the community as it is. Since it has a uniquely wide breadth and depth even at this stage and I expect amazing things from the community when the time comes.

So I see there is no real issue with NEM community (and surely only imaginary fiasco). Thank you all for your supports.
full member
Activity: 135
Merit: 100

If NEM  software is mostly cloned from NXT with a few changes 1:40 will be a very good deal.


It isn't. It's written from scratch and the devs are working on it everyday. This whole silver to NXT Gold may have been that start of NEM but with the developments so far it looks like NEM is going to be a lot more than that.
nem exciting one currency, will change the world。
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
here is my suggestion for the sockpuppets problem:
1) disqualify all the new accounts after January 21, 2014 and refund them if they did fund NEM project;and
2)  give those shakes to the real and important members of BTT, such as Hero Members or Sr. Members if they are interested in NEM project.
so we can get strong support from the community.


Throw the baby out along with the bathwater, its a great idea, why did we not think of this before Roll Eyes. I joined bitcointalk for the sole purpose of joining NEM, I read this thread every day for the last one month. I paid for my stake fair and square, I don't have multiple stakes and yet u want to kick us out , I have a suggestion maybe we should put the cutoff point to accounts created in October, that would be even better, idiots like u will also be included. Will gladly give up my stake if u did  Angry

+1
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
here is my suggestion for the sockpuppets problem:
1) disqualify all the new accounts after January 21, 2014 and refund them if they did fund NEM project;and
2)  give those shakes to the real and important members of BTT, such as Hero Members or Sr. Members if they are interested in NEM project.
so we can get strong support from the community.


I agree with this 100%. If NEM isn't going to honour the statements utopian made previously on multiple accounts we might as well eradicate all the socks and suffer the consequences of that rule change.

As it stands, there has been a retrospective rule change, BUT we still have sockpuppets, so NEM distribution is flawed. Might as well have a retrospective rule change BUT end up with NO sockpuppets at the end of it.

It would require utopianfuture doing a monumental back-flip in the pike position, but IMO banning all sockpuppets is easier to defend than the current policy of 5. The '5 socks' policy looks ridiculous, and there's obviously some people who avoided taint analysis who have a lot more than 5.

UP could reboot a new BTT account to carry on his leadership of NEM, and the sockpuppet fiasco would be over.

One account one stake, and no more socks. Ban all socks!!



 Huh u mean ban socks right.
newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
here is my suggestion for the sockpuppets problem:
1) disqualify all the new accounts after January 21, 2014 and refund them if they did fund NEM project;and
2)  give those shakes to the real and important members of BTT, such as Hero Members or Sr. Members if they are interested in NEM project.
so we can get strong support from the community.


I agree with this 100%. If NEM isn't going to honour the statements utopian made previously on multiple accounts we might as well eradicate all the socks and suffer the consequences of that rule change.

As it stands, there has been a retrospective rule change, BUT we still have sockpuppets, so NEM distribution is flawed. Might as well have a retrospective rule change BUT end up with NO sockpuppets at the end of it.

It would require utopianfuture doing a monumental back-flip in the pike position, but IMO banning all sockpuppets is easier to defend than the current policy of 5. The '5 socks' policy looks ridiculous, and there's obviously some people who avoided taint analysis who have a lot more than 5.

UP could reboot a new BTT account to carry on his leadership of NEM, and the sockpuppet fiasco would be over.

One account one stake, and no more socks. Ban all socks!!

full member
Activity: 183
Merit: 100
here is my suggestion for the sockpuppets problem:
1) disqualify all the new accounts after January 21, 2014 and refund them if they did fund NEM project;and
2)  give those shakes to the real and important members of BTT, such as Hero Members or Sr. Members if they are interested in NEM project.
so we can get strong support from the community.


Throw the baby out along with the bathwater, its a great idea, why did we not think of this before Roll Eyes. I joined bitcointalk for the sole purpose of joining NEM, I read this thread every day for the last one month. I paid for my stake fair and square, I don't have multiple stakes and yet u want to kick us out , I have a suggestion maybe we should put the cutoff point to accounts created in October, that would be even better, idiots like u will also be included. Will gladly give up my stake if u did  Angry
+1 Angry Angry
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
Sorry lost my cool there. But look its not that simple. There are real people supporting NEM who are newbies. Please try to understand that.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
here is my suggestion for the sockpuppets problem:
1) disqualify all the new accounts after January 21, 2014 and refund them if they did fund NEM project;and
2)  give those shakes to the real and important members of BTT, such as Hero Members or Sr. Members if they are interested in NEM project.
so we can get strong support from the community.


Throw the baby out along with the bathwater, its a great idea, why did we not think of this before Roll Eyes. I joined bitcointalk for the sole purpose of joining NEM, I read this thread every day for the last one month. I paid for my stake fair and square, I don't have multiple stakes and yet u want to kick us out , I have a suggestion maybe we should put the cutoff point to accounts created in October, that would be even better, idiots like u will also be included. Will gladly give up my stake if u did  Angry
hero member
Activity: 980
Merit: 1001

If NEM  software is mostly cloned from NXT with a few changes 1:40 will be a very good deal.


It isn't. It's written from scratch and the devs are working on it everyday. This whole silver to NXT Gold may have been that start of NEM but with the developments so far it looks like NEM is going to be a lot more than that.
Jump to: