[NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement - No Envy Movement - Updates+Discussion thread - page 403.

Xpedite

sr. member

Activity: 258

Merit: 250

DRAMA: Dumb Retards Asking More Attention

Quote from: utopianfuture on February 17, 2014, 08:21:40 AM

I won't make any change to the principle of 1 account/ 1 share which is the basic stone of NEM's fundraising/ principle.

For some news, here is the preview of NEM's front site which is pretty much just the front page right now http://www.ournem.com/.
This is for preview only so please do not circulate as I am in process of obtaining image rights for the site.

Now here is a quick bounty of 500 NXT for anyone can correctly identify the front page picture.

UP

I love the site!
As for the picture, http://proof.nationalgeographic.com/2014/01/01/pictures-we-love-signals-and-remnants/

Grin

cgminer-o

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

1$ =1 MEC 2013 (2,56 $) 5$ =1MEC 2014 ?

Quote from: jkoil on February 17, 2014, 08:24:14 AM

Quote from: cgminer-o on February 17, 2014, 08:14:59 AM

is that your own calculation or who has done it?

Yes, my calculation.

ashapasa

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Quote from: caspar on February 17, 2014, 08:23:07 AM

Quote from: ashapasa on February 17, 2014, 08:14:48 AM

guys let not talk about this anymore, our efforts and by extension the value of our stakes are better served by promoting NEM and spreading knowledge of it to the masses.

It was all done according to the rules of the IPO and I think utopianfuture has said he will not change the rule retrospectively, just be glad we are part of this project and try to make it succeed.

Moaning,bitching and crying will not help anyone Angry

Is a member of this project will have the right to say, you are not qualified to tell people not to talk.
Why the project management personnel to join the banned new registered users, is the existence of the problem. Angry

OK u are a member Grin

than do something useful contribute.

zoata87

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1004

Quote from: caspar on February 17, 2014, 08:23:07 AM

Quote from: ashapasa on February 17, 2014, 08:14:48 AM

guys let not talk about this anymore, our efforts and by extension the value of our stakes are better served by promoting NEM and spreading knowledge of it to the masses.

It was all done according to the rules of the IPO and I think utopianfuture has said he will not change the rule retrospectively, just be glad we are part of this project and try to make it succeed.

Moaning,bitching and crying will not help anyone Angry

Is a member of this project will have the right to say, you are not qualified to tell people not to talk.
Why the project management personnel to join the banned new registered users, is the existence of the problem. Angry

i really cant see your problem with this... accept it or not. get in or not.

weeping all 24/7

jkoil

hero member

Activity: 834

Merit: 524

Nxt NEM

Quote from: cgminer-o on February 17, 2014, 08:14:59 AM

is that your own calculation or who has done it?

caspar

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: ashapasa on February 17, 2014, 08:14:48 AM

guys let not talk about this anymore, our efforts and by extension the value of our stakes are better served by promoting NEM and spreading knowledge of it to the masses.

It was all done according to the rules of the IPO and I think utopianfuture has said he will not change the rule retrospectively, just be glad we are part of this project and try to make it succeed.

Moaning,bitching and crying will not help anyone Angry

Is a member of this project will have the right to say, you are not qualified to tell people not to talk.
Why the project management personnel to join the banned new registered users, is the existence of the problem. Angry

ashapasa

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Yes, 3 times.
There is 60% sockpuppet

[/quote]

ok caspar you are a vet and I am a newbie, tell me exactly what are you going to do to deserve three times more stake than me Angry

. Have u made any effort to promote NEM? are u even willing to change your signature Angry

. pathetic

utopianfuture

sr. member

Activity: 602

Merit: 268

Internet of Value

I won't make any change to the principle of 1 account/ 1 share which is the basic stone of NEM's fundraising/ principle.

For some news, here is the preview of NEM's front site which is pretty much just the front page right now http://www.ournem.com/.
This is for preview only so please do not circulate as I am in process of obtaining image rights for the site.

Now here is a quick bounty of 500 NXT for anyone can correctly identify the front page picture.

UP

jkoil

hero member

Activity: 834

Merit: 524

Nxt NEM

Quote from: Xpedite on February 17, 2014, 08:06:41 AM

Quote from: caspar on February 17, 2014, 07:50:49 AM

Quote from: zoata87 on February 17, 2014, 07:48:33 AM

everyone paid for the stake, in that matter i dont think its unfair.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/117855513@N04/12587663194/?edited=1

Super multi sockpuppet

Each member has the right to a fair, there are discourse right

Newly registered does not mean sockpuppet! It has been the intention from the start to attract people that are new to cryptocurrency.

true

Quote

I was new to bitcointalk too when I registered for NEM. We have gone through this discussion numerous times. Procedures are in place to deal with this...

yes, but even the procedures have been changed during this IPO, though it can be said that procedures have been made more accurate, but still they have been changed, they have not been in stone.
So, there is no "law", which prevents new changes in procedures or protocols.

cgminer-o

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

1$ =1 MEC 2013 (2,56 $) 5$ =1MEC 2014 ?

ashapasa

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

guys let not talk about this anymore, our efforts and by extension the value of our stakes are better served by promoting NEM and spreading knowledge of it to the masses.

It was all done according to the rules of the IPO and I think utopianfuture has said he will not change the rule retrospectively, just be glad we are part of this project and try to make it succeed.

Moaning,bitching and crying will not help anyone Angry

caspar

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: jkoil on February 17, 2014, 08:07:38 AM

Quote from: caspar on February 17, 2014, 07:35:39 AM

Super multi sockpuppet, not fair, I think, Formula must change!
The old user registered before February 1st=a
The new user registration after February 1st=b

C=3*a+1*b

number of NEM per stake spot = total of NEM issued/ (C + development stakes)

I feel very depressed!

have a look my picture. Cry

http://www.flickr.com/photos/117855513@N04/12587663194/

What Formula you are talking ... are you suggesting a new one, where
the veterans would get stakes 3 times more than the newbies?

Yes, 3 times.
There is 60% sockpuppet

jkoil

hero member

Activity: 834

Merit: 524

Nxt NEM

Quote from: caspar on February 17, 2014, 07:35:39 AM

Super multi sockpuppet, not fair, I think, Formula must change!
The old user registered before February 1st=a
The new user registration after February 1st=b

C=3*a+1*b

number of NEM per stake spot = total of NEM issued/ (C + development stakes)

I feel very depressed!

have a look my picture. Cry

http://www.flickr.com/photos/117855513@N04/12587663194/

What Formula you are talking ... are you suggesting a new one, where
the veterans would get stakes 3 times more than the newbies?

caspar

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

Quote from: caspar on February 17, 2014, 07:35:39 AM

Super multi sockpuppet, not fair, I think, Formula must change!
The old user registered before February 1st=a
The new user registration after February 1st=b

C=3*a+1*b

number of NEM per stake spot = total of NEM issued/ (C + development stakes)

I feel very depressed!

have a look my picture. Cry

http://www.flickr.com/photos/117855513@N04/12587663194/

Many people do not know the seriousness of the problem, if some of our members, the allocation of shares does not mean, it will cause serious inflation!

To have a look of sockpuppet existence, that is why I proposed formula must change!

Xpedite

sr. member

Activity: 258

Merit: 250

DRAMA: Dumb Retards Asking More Attention

Quote from: caspar on February 17, 2014, 07:50:49 AM

Quote from: zoata87 on February 17, 2014, 07:48:33 AM

everyone paid for the stake, in that matter i dont think its unfair.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/117855513@N04/12587663194/?edited=1

Super multi sockpuppet

Each member has the right to a fair, there are discourse right

Newly registered does not mean sockpuppet! It has been the intention from the start to attract people that are new to cryptocurrency.
I was new to bitcointalk too when I registered for NEM. We have gone through this discussion numerous times. Procedures are in place to deal with this...

ashapasa

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

great

chris_m

newbie

Activity: 31

Merit: 0

See my signature. Fully support NEM.

ashapasa

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

Fatih87SK please support NEM by creating a signature under your profile. Cheesy

Fatih87SK

hero member

Activity: 616

Merit: 500

Quote from: caspar on February 17, 2014, 07:46:34 AM

Quote from: Xpedite on February 17, 2014, 07:43:34 AM

Quote from: caspar on February 17, 2014, 07:35:39 AM

Super multi sockpuppet, not fair, I think, Formula must change!
The old user registered before February 1st=a
The new user registration after February 1st=b

C=1*a+3*b

number of NEM per stake spot = total of NEM issued/ (C + development stakes)

I feel very depressed!

This makes no sense to me Huh

You have the right to a fair, have a look my picture.
You think is fair? Huh

http://www.flickr.com/photos/117855513@N04/12587663194/

Are we going to talk about unfair stakes or about NEM's future?

Come on, how old are we. Get over it and move on to what the future can bring you with your own stake.

ashapasa

sr. member

Activity: 420

Merit: 250

I no understand.
U have a stake or no?

Topic: [NEM] NEM -New Economy Movement - No Envy Movement - Updates+Discussion thread - page 403. (Read 661525 times)