Hello mr utopian!
My brother told me that you put me among the cheaters list in this nem thing.
What have I done wrong? :O
Sorr but Im not good at these BTC thing, I only using ripple and sent the proper ammount of btc from one of my wallet. And I choosed Bitstamp as a gateway so you can see only that the money came from Bitstamp, because ripple using that for btc sending.
Because of this I just see that the ammount has been sent to there, I dont see any transaction, because ripple isnt connected to bitcoin directly only throught Bitstamp.
I only saw the blockchain info and when I saw a new transaction I copied the url, my brother later than told me that it wasnt the proper transaction url because the Bitstamp sending btc from and address with a lot of bitcoins, more than 100-200, and that address had only 1-2 bitcoins. So we parsed the transactions and when we saw 1 transactions what could belonged to bitstamp I coped that url and edited my post:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Fb93mDfVbTqabpKiUfxGbmaHuTLYWqH7H
How ever it can be that I did the mistake unfortunately Sad
And unfortunately we wasnt sent directly from our main ripple address so we have 0 evidence to confirm that.
If want you can delete me on the list, maybe then I will send btc from an other address what I will make later, but the fees as I see now higher.
My brother told me that you put me among the cheaters list in this nem thing.
What have I done wrong? :O
Sorr but Im not good at these BTC thing, I only using ripple and sent the proper ammount of btc from one of my wallet. And I choosed Bitstamp as a gateway so you can see only that the money came from Bitstamp, because ripple using that for btc sending.
Because of this I just see that the ammount has been sent to there, I dont see any transaction, because ripple isnt connected to bitcoin directly only throught Bitstamp.
I only saw the blockchain info and when I saw a new transaction I copied the url, my brother later than told me that it wasnt the proper transaction url because the Bitstamp sending btc from and address with a lot of bitcoins, more than 100-200, and that address had only 1-2 bitcoins. So we parsed the transactions and when we saw 1 transactions what could belonged to bitstamp I coped that url and edited my post:
https://blockchain.info/address/1Fb93mDfVbTqabpKiUfxGbmaHuTLYWqH7H
How ever it can be that I did the mistake unfortunately Sad
And unfortunately we wasnt sent directly from our main ripple address so we have 0 evidence to confirm that.
If want you can delete me on the list, maybe then I will send btc from an other address what I will make later, but the fees as I see now higher.
Here are two users who used the same hash
254 DrSweizer eb94ee3c0d5a66284b3f1625270a8136d969c37613b71d34f570dac8868bcedd
263 rhythmic eb94ee3c0d5a66284b3f1625270a8136d969c37613b71d34f570dac8868bcedd (HASH check reference sheet)
Both have PM me saying they made that transaction. None has provided a conclusive evidence of owning that transaction including
1. sign the transaction with the account name
2. or send a very small amount from the sending address to prove the ownership of the sending address
rhythmic is an account belonging to a forum veteran, and therefore following the established criterion in the case two users having the same hash (veteran account is the first prioritization and posting the hash first is the second prioritization) - rhythmic is given a stake while DrSweizer is label "fraudster"
Now it is up to the two parties to establish a conclusive evidence to reserve the above decision. Make it public so every NEM stakeholders can witness. Thanks.
UP
