Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs - page 1340. (Read 2985503 times)
these are very exciting times!
As our launch draws near I think it's important to take a moment and think about what really matters and what we are trying to do with NEM. In order to do this I'd like to share a quote from an article I very much agree with:
You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matter
Whatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work.
Quote
The emphasis on beating others to the market just seems silly and misguided. When you’re shopping for a new mouse, do you search for the first laser mouse or the best one? Do you care who built and sold the first set of Bluetooth headphones? When it comes to personal electronics, no good idea is left uncopied and, before long, everything good that might once have been unique becomes a matter of choice for the consumer. So even if you’re first to reach a new technological breakthrough, your window for enjoying that lead will be brief.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers.
You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matter
Whatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work.
Quality and a great user experience is what really counts. There are admittedly still some rough edges, but we have some amazing things planned for the near future that will help out a lot.
upvote guys! http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2yx98r/proofofimportance_how_nem_is_going_to_add/
just upvoted ...
BTW Ive reached out to iruniclee, hope he gets in touch
Taumuon used to be in charge of /nemcoin, but he hasn't been around in ages.
I want to make greentea our reddit admin, but it's hard to get in touch with people
So will NEM launch all of a sudden without any countdown?
Ninja launch might be in the works
And I also doubt that stakeholders, that sold their stake already, are the stakeholders we are searching for...
yep, clearly dumpers
As our launch draws near I think it's important to take a moment and think about what really matters and what we are trying to do with NEM. In order to do this I'd like to share a quote from an article I very much agree with:
You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matter
Whatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work.
Quote
The emphasis on beating others to the market just seems silly and misguided. When you’re shopping for a new mouse, do you search for the first laser mouse or the best one? Do you care who built and sold the first set of Bluetooth headphones? When it comes to personal electronics, no good idea is left uncopied and, before long, everything good that might once have been unique becomes a matter of choice for the consumer. So even if you’re first to reach a new technological breakthrough, your window for enjoying that lead will be brief.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers.
You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matter
Whatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work.
In tech all first generations give way to second generations. It is basically something that can be counted. And then all second generations give way to third gens.
People can hate on us, but it won't stop it.
Great analogy, except comparing NEM to Apple is like ...
Please note my point:
Whatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work.
As our launch draws near I think it's important to take a moment and think about what really matters and what we are trying to do with NEM. In order to do this I'd like to share a quote from an article I very much agree with:
You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matter
Whatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work.
Quote
The emphasis on beating others to the market just seems silly and misguided. When you’re shopping for a new mouse, do you search for the first laser mouse or the best one? Do you care who built and sold the first set of Bluetooth headphones? When it comes to personal electronics, no good idea is left uncopied and, before long, everything good that might once have been unique becomes a matter of choice for the consumer. So even if you’re first to reach a new technological breakthrough, your window for enjoying that lead will be brief.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers.
You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matter
Whatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work.
Co-sign
And Regular customers and avarage joes are those that can turn cryptos into real gold mine
Great analogy, except comparing NEM to Apple is like comparing diarrhoea to gold.
As our launch draws near I think it's important to take a moment and think about what really matters and what we are trying to do with NEM. In order to do this I'd like to share a quote from an article I very much agree with:
You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matter
Whatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work.
Quote
The emphasis on beating others to the market just seems silly and misguided. When you’re shopping for a new mouse, do you search for the first laser mouse or the best one? Do you care who built and sold the first set of Bluetooth headphones? When it comes to personal electronics, no good idea is left uncopied and, before long, everything good that might once have been unique becomes a matter of choice for the consumer. So even if you’re first to reach a new technological breakthrough, your window for enjoying that lead will be brief.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers.
You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matter
Whatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work.
Co-sign
And Regular customers and avarage joes are those that can turn cryptos into real gold mine
As our launch draws near I think it's important to take a moment and think about what really matters and what we are trying to do with NEM. In order to do this I'd like to share a quote from an article I very much agree with:
You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matter
Whatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work.
Quote
The emphasis on beating others to the market just seems silly and misguided. When you’re shopping for a new mouse, do you search for the first laser mouse or the best one? Do you care who built and sold the first set of Bluetooth headphones? When it comes to personal electronics, no good idea is left uncopied and, before long, everything good that might once have been unique becomes a matter of choice for the consumer. So even if you’re first to reach a new technological breakthrough, your window for enjoying that lead will be brief.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers.
When Apple cites numbers, one of its favorite data points to bring up is user satisfaction, which is close to 100 percent for all of its products. That’s in spite of the company rarely being the first to do anything. Just take HTC as an example: it had an aluminum unibody phone, a 7-inch aluminum tablet, a plus-sized smartphone, and the Beats brand all before Apple did. Apple’s just doing all these things a little bit better and profiting from it.
Quality matters more than speed. That is especially true in a tech industry where speed advantages perish almost as soon as they appear. I’d love to see the new MacBook legitimately overshadowed by a better competitor. With Windows 10 on the horizon, that’s a real possibility. But as of today, Apple’s best competitors seem lost chasing their spec tails and neglecting what matters. Beat the Mac’s experience, not its numbers.
You can read the full article here: http://www.theverge.com/2015/3/13/8202873/first-doesnt-matter
Whatever you may think of Apple and their strategy, I think we can both agree that the above principle is what matters in the end. Now, we're not apple, but we are aiming for something different than scam and pump and dump, at least this much should be clear after more than one year of hard work.
seems fair, but for my taste you are changing the rules too often... maybe you should discuss with the community about it before, instead of changing after...
Thanks for the feedback.
As you can see we are adapting and striving to find a better way to do just that.
NXT AE Redemption Update and Official Announcement: Click here!
seems fair, but for my taste you are changing the rules too often... maybe you should discuss with the community about it before, instead of changing after...
And I also doubt that stakeholders, that sold their stake already, are the stakeholders we are searching for...
NXT AE Redemption Update and Official Announcement: Click here!
upvote guys! http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2yx98r/proofofimportance_how_nem_is_going_to_add/
just upvoted ...
BTW Ive reached out to iruniclee, hope he gets in touch
thanks
whos iruniclee?Moterator of /r/nem
http://www.reddit.com/user/iruniclee
upvote guys! http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2yx98r/proofofimportance_how_nem_is_going_to_add/
just upvoted ...
BTW Ive reached out to iruniclee, hope he gets in touch
is it possible to launch the wallet on Win 7 32bit?
When will be out final???
March, this month, 18 days remain.
When will be out final???
Still remember the huge buzz over Maidsafecoin and Ethereum, with the current plans and promises NEM could be as big as these, with an actual product.
LMFAO!
Jump to: