NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs - page 230.

Alohaboy?!

hero member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 506

Quote from: moli1 on January 26, 2018, 01:38:09 AM

NEM has held on to the $0.86 levels for the past few days, but the bulls are unable to push prices above the down trendline.
This is likely to lead to another attempt to break down of $0.86 within a couple of days.
If the bears succeed, a fall to the Jan. 16 lows of $0.55134 is likely. The 20-day EMA has turned down and is likely to complete a bearish crossover if the support breaks.
We don’t find any bullish setups on the XEM/$$$ pair with price trading below the trendline and both the moving averages.
A change in trend will be signaled once it rallies above $1.21.

You never know what the market brings, but in the long run nem never disappoints Wink

MoneyJ

hero member

Activity: 1022

Merit: 504

GoMeat - Digitalizing Meat Stores - ICO

Hoping that the price would be stable . NEM platform would be in full swing and should dapps adapt its platform , this would drive developers swoop down and use it.

moli1

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 118

NEM has held on to the $0.86 levels for the past few days, but the bulls are unable to push prices above the down trendline.
This is likely to lead to another attempt to break down of $0.86 within a couple of days.
If the bears succeed, a fall to the Jan. 16 lows of $0.55134 is likely. The 20-day EMA has turned down and is likely to complete a bearish crossover if the support breaks.
We don’t find any bullish setups on the XEM/$$$ pair with price trading below the trendline and both the moving averages.
A change in trend will be signaled once it rallies above $1.21.

CryptoNeed

full member

Activity: 504

Merit: 137

Nope.

Quote from: LemonAndFriesOne on January 26, 2018, 12:11:13 AM

Quote from: Tehfiend on January 25, 2018, 06:01:49 PM

Quote from: LemonAndFriesOne on January 25, 2018, 11:33:50 AM

Quote from: suky321 on January 25, 2018, 01:48:24 AM

B Grade - ETH and EOS.
B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem.
C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM.
I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-

C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP.
C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN.
D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA.
D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.

These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s Cheesy

They are not meaningless at all. By giving these ratings, they are making crypto assets more legit and mainstream. These ratings are not based on the merits of the technology but their potentials as investments and they NEVER give out A's. A rating of C is not bad like in school grades and actually indicates to hold that investment.

You mean the way they gave AAA ratings to subprime mortgages right before the great USA recession of 2008? Roll Eyes

Again, meaningless ratings from people who barely understand Bitcoin but want to manipulate the markets.

+1

Not more than an already established rating company which does not want to miss the crypto train ...
Reading their crypto rating is like watching videos from all the new experts on Youtube ... Roll Eyes

LemonAndFriesOne

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Tehfiend on January 25, 2018, 06:01:49 PM

Quote from: LemonAndFriesOne on January 25, 2018, 11:33:50 AM

Quote from: suky321 on January 25, 2018, 01:48:24 AM

B Grade - ETH and EOS.
B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem.
C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM.
I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-

C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP.
C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN.
D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA.
D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.

These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s Cheesy

They are not meaningless at all. By giving these ratings, they are making crypto assets more legit and mainstream. These ratings are not based on the merits of the technology but their potentials as investments and they NEVER give out A's. A rating of C is not bad like in school grades and actually indicates to hold that investment.

You mean the way they gave AAA ratings to subprime mortgages right before the great USA recession of 2008? Roll Eyes

Again, meaningless ratings from people who barely understand Bitcoin but want to manipulate the markets.

nemwanderer

full member

Activity: 230

Merit: 100

Quote from: gentlemand on January 25, 2018, 09:21:52 PM

Quote from: Tehfiend on January 25, 2018, 09:16:18 PM

You're only seeing the reaction from the crypto world and most people don't understand that a C rating is not bad and BTC didn't get an A because they just never give out A's. There's a ton of other people out there who had dismissed Bitcoin early on as a ponzi scam who might take a second look after seeing these ratings.

I'm not bereft because of these ratings. They're blatant shite. Point me towards someone who is taking them seriously.

The overall concept is sound and potentially helpful. The execution of this particular iteration is a steaming piss take.

Yeah feels like the market is shrugging these off. Maybe some reaction in price but nothing earth shattering.

Moving on...feels like cryptos are basing after the recent bludgeoning. What will be the catalyst for another gap higher in NEM (if any)?

gentlemand

legendary

Activity: 2590

Merit: 3015

Welt Am Draht

Quote from: Tehfiend on January 25, 2018, 09:16:18 PM

You're only seeing the reaction from the crypto world and most people don't understand that a C rating is not bad and BTC didn't get an A because they just never give out A's. There's a ton of other people out there who had dismissed Bitcoin early on as a ponzi scam who might take a second look after seeing these ratings.

I'm not bereft because of these ratings. They're blatant shite. Point me towards someone who is taking them seriously.

The overall concept is sound and potentially helpful. The execution of this particular iteration is a steaming piss take.

Tehfiend

hero member

Activity: 491

Merit: 514

Quote from: gentlemand on January 25, 2018, 08:04:51 PM

I have not seen one positive reception to their ratings. There's been nothing but universal flabbergastiness. There no doubt is the desire for something thorough and credible. This is not it and credible ratings would be much, much uglier than these ones.

You're only seeing the reaction from the crypto world and most people don't understand that a C rating is not bad and BTC didn't get an A because they just never give out A's. There's a ton of other people out there who had dismissed Bitcoin early on as a ponzi scam who might take a second look after seeing these ratings.

Quote from: ruletheworld on January 25, 2018, 08:17:44 PM

Quote from: Tehfiend on January 25, 2018, 08:03:08 PM

The fact is that people do pay for their research so even though you and I don't care, others do in fact value their ratings. This is meaningful as it gives credence to crypto assets for that audience regardless of what we think.

This is again not true. The "people" you're talking about aren't investors. No one with money who knows what they are doing ever pay any attention to these ratings. The worst thing you can do is to make your investment decisions based on these types of sell-side research. That's called dumb money on the street.

Not sure how you can be so confident on what is true or not in regards to how these ratings effect every single person out there haha. Wish I was omnipotent like you ;-). Don't confuse opinion for fact...

You're thinking only of crypto enthusiasts or wall street investors. I'm talking about the people that have ignored Bitcoin because it was a scam or ponzi scheme. They aren't going to invest based on these ratings. The fact that they even researched and rated them might make them take a second look. I have a friend that stayed away for years until he heard about the futures contracts. He didn't purchase any but the fact that they existed made him reconsider his understanding and he started asking me for more info which led to me selling him $3300 worth of XEM. These ratings could have the same effect.

Re: "dumb money", you don't think there's already a ton of it in these markets? You don't think these headlines could bring in more?

ruletheworld

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1045

Quote from: Tehfiend on January 25, 2018, 08:03:08 PM

Quote from: ruletheworld on January 25, 2018, 07:10:27 PM

If you think this is the case, you have no understanding of how Wall Street sell side research works. Any guess how they make money? Who is paying them for the research? What's the firm's history in ratings (hint: very ugly)?

These ratings have absolutely nothing to do with either technology or as investment potential. They have everything to do with the firm's, and their clients' current crypto holdings.

The fact is that people do pay for their research so even though you and I don't care, others do in fact value their ratings. This is meaningful as it gives credence to crypto assets for that audience regardless of what we think.

This is again not true. The "people" you're talking about aren't investors. No one with money who knows what they are doing ever pay any attention to these ratings. The worst thing you can do is to make your investment decisions based on these types of sell-side research. That's called dumb money on the street.

gentlemand

legendary

Activity: 2590

Merit: 3015

Welt Am Draht

Quote from: Tehfiend on January 25, 2018, 08:03:08 PM

The fact is that people do pay for their research so even though you and I don't care, others do in fact value their ratings. This is meaningful as it gives credence to crypto assets to that audience regardless of what we think.

I have not seen one positive reception to their ratings. There's been nothing but universal flabbergastiness. There no doubt is the desire for something thorough and credible. This is not it and credible ratings would be much, much uglier than these ones.

Tehfiend

hero member

Activity: 491

Merit: 514

Quote from: ruletheworld on January 25, 2018, 07:10:27 PM

If you think this is the case, you have no understanding of how Wall Street sell side research works. Any guess how they make money? Who is paying them for the research? What's the firm's history in ratings (hint: very ugly)?

These ratings have absolutely nothing to do with either technology or as investment potential. They have everything to do with the firm's, and their clients' current crypto holdings.

The fact is that people do pay for their research so even though you and I don't care, others do in fact value their ratings. This is meaningful as it gives credence to crypto assets for that audience regardless of what we think.

ruletheworld

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1045

Quote from: Tehfiend on January 25, 2018, 06:01:49 PM

Quote from: LemonAndFriesOne on January 25, 2018, 11:33:50 AM

Quote from: suky321 on January 25, 2018, 01:48:24 AM

B Grade - ETH and EOS.
B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem.
C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM.
I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-

C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP.
C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN.
D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA.
D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.

These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s Cheesy

They are not meaningless at all. By giving these ratings, they are making crypto assets more legit and mainstream. These ratings are not based on the merits of the technology but their potentials as investments and they NEVER give out A's. A rating of C is not bad like in school grades and actually indicates to hold that investment.

If you think this is the case, you have no understanding of how Wall Street sell side research works. Any guess how they make money? Who is paying them for the research? What's the firm's history in ratings (hint: very ugly)?

These ratings have absolutely nothing to do with either technology or as investment potential. They have everything to do with the firm's, and their clients' current crypto holdings.

Tehfiend

hero member

Activity: 491

Merit: 514

Quote from: LemonAndFriesOne on January 25, 2018, 11:33:50 AM

Quote from: suky321 on January 25, 2018, 01:48:24 AM

B Grade - ETH and EOS.
B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem.
C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM.
I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-

C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP.
C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN.
D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA.
D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.

These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s Cheesy

They are not meaningless at all. By giving these ratings, they are making crypto assets more legit and mainstream. These ratings are not based on the merits of the technology but their potentials as investments and they NEVER give out A's. A rating of C is not bad like in school grades and actually indicates to hold that investment.

Alohaboy?!

hero member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 506

Quote from: greentea on January 25, 2018, 02:25:21 PM

Quote from: Alohaboy?! on January 25, 2018, 09:20:12 AM

Dear NEMbers, we are working on a big wallet relaunch and need your help.

Please fill out this survey: https://goo.gl/forms/T8ZukL2DNJpCOdRF2

Thanks in advance

a NanoWallet relaunch?

yes

greentea

legendary

Activity: 1418

Merit: 1002

Quote from: Alohaboy?! on January 25, 2018, 09:20:12 AM

Dear NEMbers, we are working on a big wallet relaunch and need your help.

Please fill out this survey: https://goo.gl/forms/T8ZukL2DNJpCOdRF2

Thanks in advance

a NanoWallet relaunch?

ruletheworld

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1045

Quote from: LemonAndFriesOne on January 25, 2018, 11:33:50 AM

Quote from: suky321 on January 25, 2018, 01:48:24 AM

B Grade - ETH and EOS.
B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem.
C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM.
I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-

C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP.
C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN.
D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA.
D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.

These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s Cheesy

Agreed, this is a joke. ADA and EOS don't even have a working blockchain, but they're rated higher than NEM. Suuure

LemonAndFriesOne

legendary

Activity: 1050

Merit: 1000

Quote from: suky321 on January 25, 2018, 01:48:24 AM

B Grade - ETH and EOS.
B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem.
C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM.
I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-

C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP.
C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN.
D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA.
D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.

These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s Cheesy

Alohaboy?!

hero member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 506

Dear NEMbers, we are working on a big wallet relaunch and need your help.

Please fill out this survey: https://goo.gl/forms/T8ZukL2DNJpCOdRF2

Thanks in advance

CryptoNeed

full member

Activity: 504

Merit: 137

Nope.

Quote from: tbandy on January 25, 2018, 09:17:18 AM

In my opinion if NEM were listed on Binance and a little bit more of quality marketing it can go real high Because this coin has all the potential to growth.
Good team, fast and secure.

It already grew without Binance and it will continue to do so. Binance is just for small private investors. Wink

tbandy

jr. member

Activity: 167

Merit: 5

In my opinion if NEM were listed on Binance and a little bit more of quality marketing it can go real high Because this coin has all the potential to growth.
Good team, fast and secure.

Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs - page 230. (Read 2984910 times)