Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs - page 507. (Read 2985369 times)
when nem 2 bil market cap?
Hello guys. I have a question about harvesting. I started yesterday delegated harvesting with Vesting Balance more than 100.000 NEM and it showed "Stop Delegated Harvesting" button ( Delegated harvesting is active) and i checked my balance today and no changes.
How reward looks like. Where should i check it?
How reward looks like. Where should i check it?
So how do we go about raising this with the people who could make it happen? They don't seem to pop up in here all that often, and perhaps they're so up to their ears in playing the long game that they may not be inclined to pursue it.
I think most stakeholders would rather receive a trezor wallet than a silver coin also 
I need Trezor support for NEM soooooo badly right now.
It would be extremely useful. I presume NEM's main developers will be too busy for such a thing. Are there others equally conversant who'll know how to do it?
I'm totally new to Trezor, what can it do to NEM? I only new this is a hardware wallet provider but what else can it do to make nem grow?
Right now I nly kept mine in my nanowallet and save all those privatekeys and the .wl file to a safe place.
why you want a trezor for NEM when NEM has multisignature accounts feature? Multisignature is basically a blockchain multi factor authenticator. I have to sign in my iphone and computer AND the iphone of my brother to release the funds from main account, it's impossible to hack a computer that is almost always offline and two iphones.
Multisig is still not as secure as a hardware wallet. Your iPhone and computer are both connected to the net and as we have seen, it is almost certain that there are known but undisclosed security vulnerabilities for the OS on both devices. A hardware wallet is only vulnerable to lead pipe attack and can not be comprised otherwise.
Did I mention one of the cosigners is a offline computer? They can't hack a offline computer.
How do you get the transaction to and from the computer? You can compromise offline computers via USB thumb sticks.
You will just turn on that computer internet to sign and turn it off again. OK man, just buy a cheap computer specifically for that and do not compromise it with usb thumb sticks please lol. Your computers and phones are NOT a target, hackers target big exchanges not your home computers, believe me. If someone want to hack your home computers they will have a bad time trying with multisignature, in that case they will decide to try hack something easier like a bank or exchange or something. You don't really need a Trazor. It's cool to give xem holders Hardware wallet but not necessary.
Then that is not an offline computer
. Yes, I use a Raspberry Pi as a "hardware wallet" but it is not as secure and convenient as my Trezor. As the value of XEM increases, so will the attention from hackers who WILL be targeting the personal PC and phones of any large stakeholders they can track down. Hardware wallets increase the utility of cryptocurrency and IMO are necessary. 
The Ledger Blue seems the obvious place to start . it already supports
BITCOIN, ETHEREUM, LITECOIN, FIDO U2F, DOGECOIN, ZCASH, DASH, STRATIS
https://www.ledgerwallet.com/products/ledger-blue
the little brother Ledger Nano S also supports all of the above and it's even cheaper than trezor.BITCOIN, ETHEREUM, LITECOIN, FIDO U2F, DOGECOIN, ZCASH, DASH, STRATIS
https://www.ledgerwallet.com/products/ledger-blue
https://www.ledgerwallet.com/products/ledger-nano-s
so I think the NEM devs should aim to get integrated in both trezor and ledger.
Yes, Trezor support would be amazing!
It's gotten to a point where one stake or supernode is worth several hundred thousand dollars. Hardware wallet support is a pressing issue.
It's gotten to a point where one stake or supernode is worth several hundred thousand dollars. Hardware wallet support is a pressing issue.
At this point, NEM should use community funds to develop its own hardware wallet.
No, it's good to use Community Funds to develop integration in existing Hardwallet. Everyone who already has one doesn't want to buy a new one just for NEM.
How bout using the community funds to develop NEM own propietary hardware wallet, 50% of profits from sales to developers and 50% towards angel investors.
Just an idea.
I highly approve of either plan. It would be nice to see the community fund deliver an unassailable benefit to all. I shudder to think how certain XEMs are being stored right now.
A hardware wallet ready to roll adds extra real value to the entire system.
Take it a step further even, %profits to developers, %profits towards angel investors, and another %profits towards those who hold a certain amount of NEM in their wallets and use it for transactions (like harvesting but profit from sales instead).
Truly making it a New Economy Movement for the benefit of all.
Implementation of something like this would be another problem to tackle though, so just ideas.
The Ledger Blue seems the obvious place to start . it already supports
BITCOIN, ETHEREUM, LITECOIN, FIDO U2F, DOGECOIN, ZCASH, DASH, STRATIS
https://www.ledgerwallet.com/products/ledger-blue
BITCOIN, ETHEREUM, LITECOIN, FIDO U2F, DOGECOIN, ZCASH, DASH, STRATIS
https://www.ledgerwallet.com/products/ledger-blue
How I keep shit secure...
Malwarebytes and Avira running on the machine
2 factor authentication for everything, with the keys backed up in an encrypted 7z document (random 32 character password)
all passwords random gibberish stored in lastpass with 32 character password which is also random gibberish on a QR code I keep in my wallet, scanned in with a 2D barcode scanner I bought used off ebay.
browser caches all stored on dataram ramdrive which erases when I shut down computer
I literally don't know any of my own passwords except ones to log into forums.
I trust lastpass to not compromise my shit.. I suppose it is an online option and some are super paranoid but all the information is encrypted, and my master password is strong, and my recovery email address is not stored on the lastpass program, and has it's own 2 factor and own 32 character password stored in my wallet.
To access my shit a person would need my home computer, wallet, and 2 factor authentication phone, and know what to do with them when they find them, and I never keep them in the same place at the same time.
I also encrypt my XEM shit in a 7z document when I'm done with it.
Malwarebytes and Avira running on the machine
2 factor authentication for everything, with the keys backed up in an encrypted 7z document (random 32 character password)
all passwords random gibberish stored in lastpass with 32 character password which is also random gibberish on a QR code I keep in my wallet, scanned in with a 2D barcode scanner I bought used off ebay.
browser caches all stored on dataram ramdrive which erases when I shut down computer
I literally don't know any of my own passwords except ones to log into forums.
I trust lastpass to not compromise my shit.. I suppose it is an online option and some are super paranoid but all the information is encrypted, and my master password is strong, and my recovery email address is not stored on the lastpass program, and has it's own 2 factor and own 32 character password stored in my wallet.
To access my shit a person would need my home computer, wallet, and 2 factor authentication phone, and know what to do with them when they find them, and I never keep them in the same place at the same time.
I also encrypt my XEM shit in a 7z document when I'm done with it.
Yes, Trezor support would be amazing!
It's gotten to a point where one stake or supernode is worth several hundred thousand dollars. Hardware wallet support is a pressing issue.
It's gotten to a point where one stake or supernode is worth several hundred thousand dollars. Hardware wallet support is a pressing issue.
At this point, NEM should use community funds to develop its own hardware wallet.
No, it's good to use Community Funds to develop integration in existing Hardwallet. Everyone who already has one doesn't want to buy a new one just for NEM.
Exactly. And existing HW wallet Trezor is outstanding so it's waste of time and money to develop new one. I contacted the vendor support and they told me, that NEM developers should initiate the integration and contact them and then a possible cooperation from their side can start. So they seem to be open to support NEM and any other coin. Actually, they already support bunch of altcoins but unforunately not XEM. Maybe someone from NEM dev team already started some work there but I'm not familiar with that.
Yes, Trezor support would be amazing!
It's gotten to a point where one stake or supernode is worth several hundred thousand dollars. Hardware wallet support is a pressing issue.
It's gotten to a point where one stake or supernode is worth several hundred thousand dollars. Hardware wallet support is a pressing issue.
At this point, NEM should use community funds to develop its own hardware wallet.
No, it's good to use Community Funds to develop integration in existing Hardwallet. Everyone who already has one doesn't want to buy a new one just for NEM.
How bout using the community funds to develop NEM own propietary hardware wallet, 50% of profits from sales to developers and 50% towards angel investors.
Just an idea.
I highly approve of either plan. It would be nice to see the community fund deliver an unassailable benefit to all. I shudder to think how certain XEMs are being stored right now.
A hardware wallet ready to roll adds extra real value to the entire system.
I need Trezor support for NEM soooooo badly right now.
It would be extremely useful. I presume NEM's main developers will be too busy for such a thing. Are there others equally conversant who'll know how to do it?
I'm totally new to Trezor, what can it do to NEM? I only new this is a hardware wallet provider but what else can it do to make nem grow?
Right now I nly kept mine in my nanowallet and save all those privatekeys and the .wl file to a safe place.
why you want a trezor for NEM when NEM has multisignature accounts feature? Multisignature is basically a blockchain multi factor authenticator. I have to sign in my iphone and computer AND the iphone of my brother to release the funds from main account, it's impossible to hack a computer that is almost always offline and two iphones.
Multisig is still not as secure as a hardware wallet. Your iPhone and computer are both connected to the net and as we have seen, it is almost certain that there are known but undisclosed security vulnerabilities for the OS on both devices. A hardware wallet is only vulnerable to lead pipe attack and can not be comprised otherwise.
Did I mention one of the cosigners is a offline computer? They can't hack a offline computer.
How do you get the transaction to and from the computer? You can compromise offline computers via USB thumb sticks.
You will just turn on that computer internet to sign and turn it off again. OK man, just buy a cheap computer specifically for that and do not compromise it with usb thumb sticks please lol. Your computers and phones are NOT a target, hackers target big exchanges not your home computers, believe me. If someone want to hack your home computers they will have a bad time trying with multisignature, in that case they will decide to try hack something easier like a bank or exchange or something. You don't really need a Trazor. It's cool to give xem holders Hardware wallet but not necessary.
Yes, Trezor support would be amazing!
It's gotten to a point where one stake or supernode is worth several hundred thousand dollars. Hardware wallet support is a pressing issue.
It's gotten to a point where one stake or supernode is worth several hundred thousand dollars. Hardware wallet support is a pressing issue.
At this point, NEM should use community funds to develop its own hardware wallet.
No, it's good to use Community Funds to develop integration in existing Hardwallet. Everyone who already has one doesn't want to buy a new one just for NEM.
How bout using the community funds to develop NEM own propietary hardware wallet, 50% of profits from sales to developers and 50% towards angel investors.
Just an idea.
Yes, Trezor support would be amazing!
It's gotten to a point where one stake or supernode is worth several hundred thousand dollars. Hardware wallet support is a pressing issue.
It's gotten to a point where one stake or supernode is worth several hundred thousand dollars. Hardware wallet support is a pressing issue.
At this point, NEM should use community funds to develop its own hardware wallet.
No, it's good to use Community Funds to develop integration in existing Hardwallet. Everyone who already has one doesn't want to buy a new one just for NEM.
Yes, Trezor support would be amazing!
It's gotten to a point where one stake or supernode is worth several hundred thousand dollars. Hardware wallet support is a pressing issue.
It's gotten to a point where one stake or supernode is worth several hundred thousand dollars. Hardware wallet support is a pressing issue.
At this point, NEM should use community funds to develop its own hardware wallet.
Bitcoin popping like is hot, and NEM following... futur is bright here !
JAPAN buy XEM like crazy 
i believe that before end of 2017 NEM price will be at least 1$
and these is first time that i tell that but i am pretty sure about what i tell you
i dont think so, it can take some time. wont be possible in 6months, but you never know. i believe that before end of 2017 NEM price will be at least 1$
and these is first time that i tell that but i am pretty sure about what i tell you
I need Trezor support for NEM soooooo badly right now.
It would be extremely useful. I presume NEM's main developers will be too busy for such a thing. Are there others equally conversant who'll know how to do it?
I'm totally new to Trezor, what can it do to NEM? I only new this is a hardware wallet provider but what else can it do to make nem grow?
Right now I nly kept mine in my nanowallet and save all those privatekeys and the .wl file to a safe place.
why you want a trezor for NEM when NEM has multisignature accounts feature? Multisignature is basically a blockchain multi factor authenticator. I have to sign in my iphone and computer AND the iphone of my brother to release the funds from main account, it's impossible to hack a computer that is almost always offline and two iphones.
Multisig is still not as secure as a hardware wallet. Your iPhone and computer are both connected to the net and as we have seen, it is almost certain that there are known but undisclosed security vulnerabilities for the OS on both devices. A hardware wallet is only vulnerable to lead pipe attack and can not be comprised otherwise.
Did I mention one of the cosigners is a offline computer? They can't hack a offline computer.
How do you get the transaction to and from the computer? You can compromise offline computers via USB thumb sticks.
JAPAN buy XEM like crazy
i believe that before end of 2017 NEM price will be at least 1$
and these is first time that i tell that but i am pretty sure about what i tell you
i believe that before end of 2017 NEM price will be at least 1$
and these is first time that i tell that but i am pretty sure about what i tell you
I need Trezor support for NEM soooooo badly right now.
It would be extremely useful. I presume NEM's main developers will be too busy for such a thing. Are there others equally conversant who'll know how to do it?
I'm totally new to Trezor, what can it do to NEM? I only new this is a hardware wallet provider but what else can it do to make nem grow?
Right now I nly kept mine in my nanowallet and save all those privatekeys and the .wl file to a safe place.
why you want a trezor for NEM when NEM has multisignature accounts feature? Multisignature is basically a blockchain multi factor authenticator. I have to sign in my iphone and computer AND the iphone of my brother to release the funds from main account, it's impossible to hack a computer that is almost always offline and two iphones.
Multisig is still not as secure as a hardware wallet. Your iPhone and computer are both connected to the net and as we have seen, it is almost certain that there are known but undisclosed security vulnerabilities for the OS on both devices. A hardware wallet is only vulnerable to lead pipe attack and can not be comprised otherwise.
Did I mention one of the cosigners is a offline computer? They can't hack a offline computer.
Jump to: