Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs - page 94. (Read 2984910 times)

Not many posts here recently, but there is a lot of talk about either "Apostilling" files of the election candidates and LuxTag services, that also use blockchain notarization. I created this video to show the basics behind this technology:

https://youtu.be/zadu2jDQK28

NEM Ukraine [EN subtitles] about meetups, elections, vision.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctlOCZbTxJo&t

Agreed with you at this stage it is get support from any state it is just beginning of this era. I hope in future we will see big support when it will get more adoption and demand for these kind of project will increase.

We shouldn't get so hopeful that blockchain projects for national currencies will be used in the near future. Blockchain-based currencies contradict many interests states have with one currency. And there are too many powerful players who benefit from these interests. That's why I don't believe that such news can have any positive effects.

need marketing everywhere, I barely see some NEM around

Perhaps an advertising campaign should be launched in China to market the WeChat app, NEM should take full advantage of its first mover benefit. The use of XEM as a P2P payment device is a great way to increase the real acceptance of NEM blockchain cash. and is going to be great

That is truly amazing news just read this article the community of that country is doing great job. This sounds great to hear National Bank Ukraine is showing its interested to adopt this tech because they know the importance of blockchain and without this there is no future. Keep working with this spirit this will make this platform really worthy.

The NEM Ukraine team filled National bank of Ukraine in on blockchain technology
 

https://medium.com/@NEMukraine/the-nem-ukraine-team-filled-national-bank-of-ukraine-in-on-blockchain-technology-9447c6840101

The usual disclaimer every software has.

There is the message in NanoWallet:

"The NEM team is not responsible for any loss of funds due to using this app on the mainnet."

What does it mean? Is it safe to use this wallet on the mainnet?

Hey guys, we've just updated everything regarding Elrond. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.39548730

New whitepaper, open source prototype, new website - and everything rewritten from scratch.

I would be very curious to get some feedback from bloodierookie, jaguar or gimre on Elrond's paper as I think there are lots of things there that could be useful to NEM there.

Technical paper: https://elrond.com/files/Elrond_Whitepaper_EN.pdf

Guys, if you list all telegram nem chats somewhere on your sites, please add our Russian Nem chat: https://t.me/nemruchats.  And of course you're always welcome to join )

https://www.coindesk.com/amber-baldet-dont-force-public-blockchains-down-enterprises-throats

What are or what will be the usercases for the public NEM chain then?! 

indeed, we'll probably see a bear market (or stagnating market) for the next 4 to 6 months before we'll have any real trend revearsal. Too many factors bringing the price down, maybe we'll see a short term peak back to 5 or 6K when Bakkt gets launched

I don't think this will happen anytime soon. As long as BTC is cheerleading, there is no decouping.

Jkoil, thanks for Your practical point of view.


There was pump before dump (from around 10cents to 12.5 cents, in case of Poloniex even 15 - dip was around 8 cents but that was extremum), and now it's easy to see and say that all it looks like dump before profitable pump. All the game is now to catch the dip. I had described here my accumulation levels. But i am not here for trolling, even for clever trolling. Everyone must do Your own research before the decision to get in or not. Market is now scary place. But one man says - Be greedy, when the others have fear, other however says - money loves silence. So after dip i will be very silent here. What are my targets. x4 from dip is minimum to me to say that entry was worth the risk. With 6000 broken (i expect Bitcoins temporary landing around 3000, but in the longer perspective - next year, repeating searching of final dip until around January 2020 - maybe even under 2000, big fishes anounced few days ago 1500 as theirs target) @BTC there is fast no chance for new ATH in case of XEM (and many others) in this or in the next year. I write fast no chance, because there are somethimes gamechangers situations in the world, that can change everything, ecpecially technical analysis and mathematical and astrological readings. Greetings for all.

edit// 6cents @Bittrex (calculated from XEMBTC, 6.3cent) almost touched. That was one of my expected levels. But other are for now possible for testing, from now to around 7th December (5, 3.5, 2.5, 1.5 and 1 cent). As i heave some for 6.5 cents, from this levels i choose 2.5 and 1 cent for catching other chunks of this cake(i dont believe in 1 cent, but cryptomarkets are learning humility constantly, so all is possible). But if area around 5/6 cents will be confirmed as a new dip, then okay, that is level from which i will be waiting for significant correction of this annoying downtrend, and x4 pump (de minimis). The main rule that i use is not accumulate for all in, only in chunks (especially in crashing markets). The other rule is that for XEM i will not use more than 2% of my whole capital calculated in dollars, japanise yen and polish zloty. For Ripple i will use the same rule. Nothing more than 2% throwed in that (splitted in chunks of course). Money management is the key if something will go wrong with "investitions" (let's be honest - speculations) like this. The other thing is, that 10% of "invested" money (so 0.2%) should not be cashouted after profit taking, instead of that should be holded for years. That's all from my methodology (i dont show here of course how i calculate levels nor times of expected market volatility - it's my private mystery and i'am not a prophet, better to say "theory of probability" player).

Today the market is recovering and this coin starts to go up. I want to believe that we are on the verge of a trend change.

As far as I know NEM together with PAL Network signed MoU about collaboration and partnership with KeySafeBank (Singapore’s newest third-party institutional- grade custodian service). Does this means that institutional investors interesting in NEM and PAL and going to invest? Any chance to see NEM and PAL at instituional platforms (like Bakkt or Fidential) ?

https://www.blockasia.io/keysafebank-nem-singapore-and-pal-network-to-collaborate-on-institutional-grade-custodian-digital-assets-vault/

Here's a stopthecoverup performance:
I have been part of NEM for a long time. This is an emergency so I am speaking out. Everything here is documented in emails and text logs, which others can leak if they see fit.

Lon Wong was the NEM Foundacion president for 2017-2018. He suddenly “stepped down” in April 2018. In reality Lon was forced out because he was caught putting NEM resources and employees to his own company, ProximaX. In other words, stealing. And abusing the trust placed in him to act in the best interests of NEM. In fact, ProximaX is a fork and can be seen as a competitor to NEM and would likely step in to take NEM’s place if NEM did poorly. This was all covered up.

Kristof Vanderek took over as interim president until the end of 2018, when NEM community planned to elect a new president and council members.

Now the election is happening. This is the first time using this election rules and they were discovered to have major flaws in allowing fake voters. In the middle of 2018 the staff saw that hundreds of people (in one certain country) who were not involved in NEM had been signed up to vote. Kristof needs to release this information. Which country was that?

Lon’s lifetime friend Stephen Chia is the regional head of NEM Southeast Asia. Stephen is on the NEM Foundacion council. Stephen owns a large stake in ProximaX in his public accounts, and may own a lot more privately. Stephen stands to profit if ProximaX over take NEM’s business.

Stephen is now running for president of NEM, and Lon has promoted his campaign.

Kristof asked the council to change the voting rules to a more fair system. Stephen (and Nelson Valero) are thought to have blocked it and will not answer questions if they did. Kristof said the council worked on this since June and have kept hitting road blocks. Time was running out so the council compromised with a system that required a 50 USD fee as a spam prevention to stop people from signing up if they were not willing to put their own money into the success of the election.

Nelson was caught paying his own funds to other peoples voting accounts, against the purpose of the fee. Many other voting accounts were funded from a ProximaX account. It is estimated that there only 300 voting accounts and about 80 of them were paid for by ProximaX and its interests. These are NOT people who were involved in the NEM community, forums, development, or investing. Here is evidence. https://coggle.it/diagram/W-s6LTnK8iR79jfC/t/ndbrufe7r5oanede43vctmuvrhti6xz7tqfvntmu/be8d7b37ddc4e1bb7a8c3a4c9d6549ad1c0a389e9a9c2cdcea240ebb426a1302 26

Nelson has been asked directly by the community if he is taking money or working for ProximaX and has not yet answered direct questions. Is he acting as their employee? (Almost certainly yes.)

In the last 24 hours the council took a vote to switch the elections to POI voting, which is how all previous voting have been done. All other council voted yes but Stephen and Nelson blocked it.

The council wants to review and possibly remove some election voting accounts which cheated the spam prevention. Stephen and Nelson seem to trying to block this.

The reasonable conclusion is that Stephen and possibly Nelson are profiting from ProximaX, and seeking to cheat the election by blocking POI or other fair voting and paying non-community members to register. With their 80+ accounts they can win president, vice president, and stack the entire council with ProximaX people, against the community and NEM employees. They can massively divert NEM funds into ProximaX, or just crash NEM and ProximaX would rise in importance as NEM falls.

The other council members and the community must stop covering up this.

COUNCIL come in the open about why Lon was forced to step down.

COUNCIL, look at the NEM rules, laws, and constitution for malfeasance or conflict of interest. There are rules about acting against the interest of NEM.

ProximaX has been shown to have improperly taken NEM resources. (Lon was running ProximaX when he stole.) If Nelson and/or Steven was taking money or being an employee from a company that is known to have stolen from NEM, that is council member malfeasance and conflict of interest. Stephen clearly has a conflict of interest as a ProximaX stake holder AND as a candidate. One or both of their conflicted council votes must be removed or recused and a new fair POI council vote should happen.

Community members, if you agree, please let the council members know. Core developers, we need you to contact the council to tell them they are obligated to remove malfeasance.

I invite any one to dispute any thing here and see if the emails and document leaks come out to prove it.

STEPHEN MUST RECUSE FROM COUNCIL VOTE!

What is your definition for 'troll' ?

If you check ormin's posts, there is mostly more content than in your posts

Newbie trolls are usually just writing: "moon hhahahhaha",   "hello im new here. whatsup".

ormin started his career here with course statistics, what may mean that he is just one investor oriented member.
ofc he may be a clever "troll" who gives only such data which is suitable for his intentions - but that is what we all are doing here