Hi Nemos thanks for the good work here, I just found out about your miner today. I was previously using the EWBF for ZEC currently runing 2 1080tis, will the fact that this miner (2.0.7) is targeted for 3+ affect my profitability?
Thanks.
Topic: [NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 195. (Read 289447 times)
Now, I am getting an error in Windows that says "This application has been blocked from accessing the hardware" and not just one but 4-5 of them.
I tried running the start.bat file using "admin" command but that just gives a straight up error and doesn't work.
I tried running the start.bat file using "admin" command but that just gives a straight up error and doesn't work.
Nemo, is there a way I could add c11 support to my copy of Nemo v2?
I see it's possible to have it enable on v1.7, but I haven't been able to work a way around v2 powershell script
I see it's possible to have it enable on v1.7, but I haven't been able to work a way around v2 powershell script
It's enabled as default. If you've disabled it, just enable it again.
Jeez I swear I didn't see the algo listed. My bad.
Thanks a lot!
Nemo, is there a way I could add c11 support to my copy of Nemo v2?
I see it's possible to have it enable on v1.7, but I haven't been able to work a way around v2 powershell script
I see it's possible to have it enable on v1.7, but I haven't been able to work a way around v2 powershell script
It's enabled as default. If you've disabled it, just enable it again.
Nemo, is there a way I could add c11 support to my copy of Nemo v2?
I see it's possible to have it enable on v1.7, but I haven't been able to work a way around v2 powershell script
I see it's possible to have it enable on v1.7, but I haven't been able to work a way around v2 powershell script
I am getting the same error. Could you shed light as to how did you fix that?
Does not validate on CPU error , pages and pages of it.
Does not validate on CPU error , pages and pages of it.
Go into the folder "Miners", edit CcminerNanashi.ps1 and comment out (add #) Lyra2v2.
Thanks a lot bro, would've never figured it out on my own lol
I am getting the same error. Could you shed light as to how did you fix that?
Does not validate on CPU error , pages and pages of it.
Does not validate on CPU error , pages and pages of it.
Go into the folder "Miners", edit CcminerNanashi.ps1 and comment out (add #) Lyra2v2.
Lyra2v2 is getting "does not validate on CPU!".
Where would I adjust the intensity for this Algo?
Edit: Nevermind, I think I got it. In the $Commands area where it lists all the algos. The extra options are in between quotations.
BTW, why do you use a different miner (ccminer-Natashi and Klaust) for the same Algo (Lyra2RE2)?
Edit 2: I think there is something wrong with the Natashi miner. I commented it out for lyra2v2 and it defaults back to Klaust. It's working now, but slightly slower than Natashi. Slow but creating shares is better than fast and no shares.
Where would I adjust the intensity for this Algo?
Edit: Nevermind, I think I got it. In the $Commands area where it lists all the algos. The extra options are in between quotations.
BTW, why do you use a different miner (ccminer-Natashi and Klaust) for the same Algo (Lyra2RE2)?
Edit 2: I think there is something wrong with the Natashi miner. I commented it out for lyra2v2 and it defaults back to Klaust. It's working now, but slightly slower than Natashi. Slow but creating shares is better than fast and no shares.
I am getting the same error. Could you shed light as to how did you fix that?
Does not validate on CPU error , pages and pages of it.
Lyra2v2 is getting "does not validate on CPU!".
Where would I adjust the intensity for this Algo?
Edit: Nevermind, I think I got it. In the $Commands area where it lists all the algos. The extra options are in between quotations.
BTW, why do you use a different miner (ccminer-Natashi and Klaust) for the same Algo (Lyra2RE2)?
Edit 2: I think there is something wrong with the Natashi miner. I commented it out for lyra2v2 and it defaults back to Klaust. It's working now, but slightly slower than Natashi. Slow but creating shares is better than fast and no shares.
Where would I adjust the intensity for this Algo?
Edit: Nevermind, I think I got it. In the $Commands area where it lists all the algos. The extra options are in between quotations.
BTW, why do you use a different miner (ccminer-Natashi and Klaust) for the same Algo (Lyra2RE2)?
Edit 2: I think there is something wrong with the Natashi miner. I commented it out for lyra2v2 and it defaults back to Klaust. It's working now, but slightly slower than Natashi. Slow but creating shares is better than fast and no shares.
It includes multiple miners for the same algos because depending on your hardware one might be faster than the other. I had the Same issue with Natashi so i just disabled it completely.
Lyra2v2 is getting "does not validate on CPU!".
Where would I adjust the intensity for this Algo?
Edit: Nevermind, I think I got it. In the $Commands area where it lists all the algos. The extra options are in between quotations.
BTW, why do you use a different miner (ccminer-Natashi and Klaust) for the same Algo (Lyra2RE2)?
Edit 2: I think there is something wrong with the Natashi miner. I commented it out for lyra2v2 and it defaults back to Klaust. It's working now, but slightly slower than Natashi. Slow but creating shares is better than fast and no shares.
Where would I adjust the intensity for this Algo?
Edit: Nevermind, I think I got it. In the $Commands area where it lists all the algos. The extra options are in between quotations.
BTW, why do you use a different miner (ccminer-Natashi and Klaust) for the same Algo (Lyra2RE2)?
Edit 2: I think there is something wrong with the Natashi miner. I commented it out for lyra2v2 and it defaults back to Klaust. It's working now, but slightly slower than Natashi. Slow but creating shares is better than fast and no shares.
legendary
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1166
My AR-15 ID's itself as a toaster. Want breakfast?
FYI C11 , specifically CHC is getting some market attention... profitability on the rise.
Might want to consider enabling/adding it; My original batch seems to want to gravitate towards it after adding it back earlier because of the news.
Just trying to make sure people get the most profitability on zpool.
cheers.
wherein it starts the miner app and assembled the web address/password/port/etc,
specifically for ccminer variants only, you can add the flag:
You can do as I do, and leave both mining, but trim intensity back on the first device like this:
If you do not define GPU's with the -d flag, you can still set intensity on a per-gpu basis as per my above -i statement. If you do set the -d flag, its done based off the set GPU's, and not an assumed 0,1,2,etc.
Hope it helps.
Might want to consider enabling/adding it; My original batch seems to want to gravitate towards it after adding it back earlier because of the news.
Just trying to make sure people get the most profitability on zpool.
cheers.
Nemo,
was curious if there is a simple way to select which GPU's to run? wanted to ask before i go digging through the code, because im still learning this coding stuff... i wanna make a gamer version or gamer start batch so i can using my primary GPU for gaming while i still mine with my other 2 cards on my personal PC when i want to play a video game...
was curious if there is a simple way to select which GPU's to run? wanted to ask before i go digging through the code, because im still learning this coding stuff... i wanna make a gamer version or gamer start batch so i can using my primary GPU for gaming while i still mine with my other 2 cards on my personal PC when i want to play a video game...
wherein it starts the miner app and assembled the web address/password/port/etc,
specifically for ccminer variants only, you can add the flag:
Code:
-d 0,1
Wherein you will be selecting device 0 and 1. Use nvidiainspector to confirm device number first, then use those number(s) of the devices you wish to mine with; seperated by commas as my example above.You can do as I do, and leave both mining, but trim intensity back on the first device like this:
Code:
-i 16.5,26,26,26
for instance for 16.5 intensity on GPU0, and 26 on GPU1-GPU3.If you do not define GPU's with the -d flag, you can still set intensity on a per-gpu basis as per my above -i statement. If you do set the -d flag, its done based off the set GPU's, and not an assumed 0,1,2,etc.
Hope it helps.
Nemo,
was curious if there is a simple way to select which GPU's to run? wanted to ask before i go digging through the code, because im still learning this coding stuff... i wanna make a gamer version or gamer start batch so i can using my primary GPU for gaming while i still mine with my other 2 cards on my personal PC when i want to play a video game...
was curious if there is a simple way to select which GPU's to run? wanted to ask before i go digging through the code, because im still learning this coding stuff... i wanna make a gamer version or gamer start batch so i can using my primary GPU for gaming while i still mine with my other 2 cards on my personal PC when i want to play a video game...
Is there any way to adjust the difficulty for each algo?
Right now I'm interested in adjusting the Equihash algo because zpool is defaulting difficulty to 200, which makes finding shares much longer. Before, it would settle at 127, but even then the shares are too infrequent. I would like to adjust to down to say 50 to see how it goes.
I'm interested in this aswellRight now I'm interested in adjusting the Equihash algo because zpool is defaulting difficulty to 200, which makes finding shares much longer. Before, it would settle at 127, but even then the shares are too infrequent. I would like to adjust to down to say 50 to see how it goes.
try disabling equihash.. it is possible to add your own -d for difficulty if you really want to..
Someone in the zpool thread showed me how. It's in the EWBF.ps1 file in the miners folder.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19976471
I hope that helps someone.
Thanks! Do do use "-I 127" #Equihash or lower?
No... that was just an example. leave it as is... nothing in the ""
Is there any way to adjust the difficulty for each algo?
Right now I'm interested in adjusting the Equihash algo because zpool is defaulting difficulty to 200, which makes finding shares much longer. Before, it would settle at 127, but even then the shares are too infrequent. I would like to adjust to down to say 50 to see how it goes.
I'm interested in this aswellRight now I'm interested in adjusting the Equihash algo because zpool is defaulting difficulty to 200, which makes finding shares much longer. Before, it would settle at 127, but even then the shares are too infrequent. I would like to adjust to down to say 50 to see how it goes.
try disabling equihash.. it is possible to add your own -d for difficulty if you really want to..
Someone in the zpool thread showed me how. It's in the EWBF.ps1 file in the miners folder.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19976471
I hope that helps someone.
Thanks! Do do use "-I 127" #Equihash or lower?
Is there any way to adjust the difficulty for each algo?
Right now I'm interested in adjusting the Equihash algo because zpool is defaulting difficulty to 200, which makes finding shares much longer. Before, it would settle at 127, but even then the shares are too infrequent. I would like to adjust to down to say 50 to see how it goes.
I'm interested in this aswellRight now I'm interested in adjusting the Equihash algo because zpool is defaulting difficulty to 200, which makes finding shares much longer. Before, it would settle at 127, but even then the shares are too infrequent. I would like to adjust to down to say 50 to see how it goes.
try disabling equihash.. it is possible to add your own -d for difficulty if you really want to..
Fromage in the zpool thread showed me how. It's in the EWBF.ps1 file in the miners folder.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19976471
I hope that helps someone.
EDIT: Gave credit where credit's due.
Thanks again, Fromage. 
I have a query about the start.bat
Right after the wallet address there is "-Location US -"
Does this make any difference? I happen to live in Australia so if zpool has any servers closer to me than USA I would prefer to use them. Whenever I mine on the larger pools for the larger coins (ETH, ZEC, etc) I generally choose their asia location servers because the ping times are much better than USA servers. The few times I have used Nicehash I use HK for Hong Kong in the server names.
I assumed that zpool was a single location pool, most likely in canada since it's .ca but if I'm wrong I'd appreciate any advice to improve my situation.
Right after the wallet address there is "-Location US -"
Does this make any difference? I happen to live in Australia so if zpool has any servers closer to me than USA I would prefer to use them. Whenever I mine on the larger pools for the larger coins (ETH, ZEC, etc) I generally choose their asia location servers because the ping times are much better than USA servers. The few times I have used Nicehash I use HK for Hong Kong in the server names.
I assumed that zpool was a single location pool, most likely in canada since it's .ca but if I'm wrong I'd appreciate any advice to improve my situation.
Hey thank you for this! Is there any miner monitoring software that is compatible with this?
I personally am presently unaware of any monitoring app that has the API support for all the different miner versions used in this package....That's the thing; each miner app has its own API format and its rather annoying.
I know this is quite an old quote - but how do you guys remotely monitor the rig mining with NemosMiner-v2.0.6-Zpool? Via Zpool stats?
thanks!
disable timetravel... (remove it from -Algo ) in start.bat
I was hoping for a solution instead of disabling it though. Is there any way to adjust the difficulty for each algo?
Right now I'm interested in adjusting the Equihash algo because zpool is defaulting difficulty to 200, which makes finding shares much longer. Before, it would settle at 127, but even then the shares are too infrequent. I would like to adjust to down to say 50 to see how it goes.
I'm interested in this aswellRight now I'm interested in adjusting the Equihash algo because zpool is defaulting difficulty to 200, which makes finding shares much longer. Before, it would settle at 127, but even then the shares are too infrequent. I would like to adjust to down to say 50 to see how it goes.
try disabling equihash.. it is possible to add your own -d for difficulty if you really want to..
When using 2.0.6 with 6x GTX 1080 Ti's and mining Timetravel, I get lots of "nonce e4e985 was already sent 0 seconds ago" (e4e985 was made up), then suddenly it finds like thousands of shares instantly. It does this over and over until the miner crashes.
It does the same on my gaming PC with 2x GTX 1080 Ti's although the miner doesn't crash on the gaming PC.
Any ideas?
Ditto!!It does the same on my gaming PC with 2x GTX 1080 Ti's although the miner doesn't crash on the gaming PC.
Any ideas?
disable timetravel... (remove it from -Algo ) in start.bat
Jump to: