[NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 42.

Gelik

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

My testing results:

https://s26.postimg.org/9f405kvrt/image.png

Proof gallery:
https://postimg.org/gallery/3gngl9ll2/

So, I preffer NemosMiner + ahashpoolplus, but it requires permanent control.

Anybody now tool for continuous grabbing timeline data trough JSON or web extract + visualize ?

>>I prefer 120 interval and 5 Percent
My switchings for 24h test (gain 3 intervel 60):
01.03.2018 18:40 Xevan nemo stratum+tcp://xevan.mine.ahashpool.com:3739 01.03.2018 19:06 Lyra2RE2 nemo stratum+tcp://lyra2v2.mine.ahashpool.com:4533 01.03.2018 19:36 Lyra2RE2 nemo stratum+tcp://lyra2v2.mine.ahashpool.com:4533 01.03.2018 19:37 Lyra2RE2 aaronsace stratum+tcp://lyra2v2.mine.ahashpool.com:4533 01.03.2018 19:42 Lyra2RE2 nemo stratum+tcp://lyra2v2.mine.ahashpool.com:4533 01.03.2018 20:24 X17 nemo stratum+tcp://x17.mine.ahashpool.com:3737 02.03.2018 04:10 Skein nemo stratum+tcp://skein.mine.ahashpool.com:4933 02.03.2018 05:19 X17 nemo stratum+tcp://x17.mine.ahashpool.com:3737 02.03.2018 06:48 C11 nemo stratum+tcp://c11.mine.ahashpool.com:3573 02.03.2018 06:58 Xevan nemo stratum+tcp://xevan.mine.ahashpool.com:3739 02.03.2018 07:44 X17 nemo stratum+tcp://x17.mine.ahashpool.com:3737 02.03.2018 11:35 X17 nemo stratum+tcp://x17.mine.ahashpool.com:3737 02.03.2018 11:36 Tribus nemo stratum+tcp://tribus.mine.ahashpool.com:8533 02.03.2018 11:45 X17 nemo stratum+tcp://x17.mine.ahashpool.com:3737 02.03.2018 12:31 X17 nemo stratum+tcp://x17.mine.ahashpool.com:3737 02.03.2018 12:33 X17 MrPlus stratum+tcp://x17.mine.ahashpool.com:3737 02.03.2018 12:36 X17 nemo stratum+tcp://x17.mine.ahashpool.com:3737 02.03.2018 12:41 Xevan nemo stratum+tcp://xevan.mine.ahashpool.com:3739 02.03.2018 15:52 Tribus nemo stratum+tcp://tribus.mine.ahashpool.com:8533 02.03.2018 16:30 Xevan nemo stratum+tcp://xevan.mine.ahashpool.com:3739

it's too match for for 24h?

millsys

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: Enkrypt on March 03, 2018, 03:29:00 PM

Quote from: millsys on March 02, 2018, 01:19:36 PM

Well the second 24 hour wasn't as nice....
2/29/2018 Nicehash 0.01319923 while my 62 GPU on X17/AHashPool did 0.013345! Since the 72 gpu should have 14.8% better I would have expected 0.015320 if I was on AHashPool.

So after 48 hours, if left on X17/AHashPool we would be around 0.028557, but currently we are 0.02744565... Not the end of the world, .001 LESS on NiceHash so far after 48 hour test. Definitely not enough to make me cancel the testing so we'll continue the tests, keeping the 62 gpu on X17/AHashPool and 72 gpu on NiceHash to see if we just had a bad day on NiceHash.....

Do you still recommend -ActiveMinerGainPct 5 for AhashPoolPlus?

I prefer 120 interval and 5 Percent

Enkrypt

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

Quote from: millsys on March 02, 2018, 01:19:36 PM

Well the second 24 hour wasn't as nice....
2/29/2018 Nicehash 0.01319923 while my 62 GPU on X17/AHashPool did 0.013345! Since the 72 gpu should have 14.8% better I would have expected 0.015320 if I was on AHashPool.

So after 48 hours, if left on X17/AHashPool we would be around 0.028557, but currently we are 0.02744565... Not the end of the world, .001 LESS on NiceHash so far after 48 hour test. Definitely not enough to make me cancel the testing so we'll continue the tests, keeping the 62 gpu on X17/AHashPool and 72 gpu on NiceHash to see if we just had a bad day on NiceHash.....

Do you still recommend -ActiveMinerGainPct 5 for AhashPoolPlus?

Storx

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 233

Quote from: georat72 on March 03, 2018, 03:22:20 AM

Hi Guys,
How can i change neoscrypt algo miner?
I want to change hsr miner with ccminer KlausT .
Best regards
-----------------------------------
I`m ready - changed it.

Go in the miner folder you want to change and add # to turn it off and remove the # in the miner you want to run, then restart the software and it will benchmark that new software change.

Enkrypt

newbie

Activity: 18

Merit: 0

For strictly NiceHash pool, do you recommend NemosMiner/NPlusMiner over the official NiceHash Miner Legacy?

@millsys, Which algos should I enable for NiceHash in NPlusMiner (1080Ti)?

ubergod

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

I'm running 2.5.1 and I'm finding that the program is restarting the mining instances alot on refreshes even if it's not switching algos..dropping my hash rate, making it have to ramp up again and again.
I'm seeing an error on refreshes trying to find devlist.json but it is clearly in the location it is looking for it. I have a feeling this is the cause of the problem. Just not sure how to fix it.

iamaeey

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Quote from: P00P135 on March 02, 2018, 09:16:12 PM

Quote from: k2laci on March 02, 2018, 08:56:44 AM

I tested zergpool (nemosminer, zergpoolplus, 24h test.

Result (6x1070 GPU) :

https://imgur.com/e4t7ZKA

https://imgur.com/e4t7ZKA

It's a disaster!

Its not nemo its zergpool that is a disaster. Sometimes its good and sometimes you get hit by pump and dump groups on some of these coins that zergpool mines.

What's the recommended pool for multialgo mining right now?

Bit2017User

jr. member

Activity: 76

Merit: 1

Quote from: Bit2017User on March 02, 2018, 05:12:12 AM

Hi all
regarding location in Nemos 2.5.1 and ZergPool
Is there support for changing location?
Location US is to be change to europe or EU?
Thanks

Update: Both of them are not working ( europe and EU )

Also the earnings display is useless when mining in LTC
Any way to adjust it?
Thanks

georat72

newbie

Activity: 47

Merit: 0

Hi Guys,
How can i change neoscrypt algo miner?
I want to change hsr miner with ccminer KlausT .
Best regards
-----------------------------------
I`m ready - changed it.

P00P135

full member

Activity: 1123

Merit: 136

Quote from: k2laci on March 02, 2018, 08:56:44 AM

I tested zergpool (nemosminer, zergpoolplus, 24h test.

Result (6x1070 GPU) :

https://imgur.com/e4t7ZKA

It's a disaster!

Its not nemo its zergpool that is a disaster. Sometimes its good and sometimes you get hit by pump and dump groups on some of these coins that zergpool mines.

Storx

full member

Activity: 322

Merit: 233

If you want to run a test on Nicehash, run identical cards with same settings on both platforms at the same time.

My personal computer is a AMD 1950x w/32gb ram rig with 4 x evga 1080ti's watercooled, so all GPU's see the same temps

When i did testing on different pools before switching my rigs over to nemo's from AM i ran 3 miners on my rig to see which pool to go to...

GPU 0 was left unused so i can still use the computer

GPU1 was used on Ahashpoolplus.bat

GPU2 was used on Nicehash.bat

GPU3 was used on zpoolplus.bat

I ran this setup for 7 days and compared the results to see which one i wanted to move my farm over to....

Ahashpoolplus 7 days total was $22.96 worth of BTC at time of testing ending, but i would receive $22.96 to my btc wallet on payout

Nicehash 7 days total was $23.41 worth of BTC at time of testing ending, but i would receive $22.23 to my btc wallet on payout due to payment fee

zpoolplus 7 days total was $21.03 worth of BTC at time of testing ending, but i would receive $21.03 to my btc wallet on payout

Justbecause

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

Quote from: puch0021 on March 02, 2018, 03:17:25 PM

I'm stopping my test I've ran for 36 hours as the results are similar to what I had ran in January.

identical 1060 x 7 rigs
AHASHplus 0.12553203 -> 0.12687823 (difference of 0.0013462 in 36 hours).
AM with NH - 0 -> 0.00198541

I think only Ahash makes sense if you have graphics cards that excel at core dependent algorithms not offered on NH and also compared to ethash. For a 1060, ethereum mining is way ahead of pretty much any alt coin at this point in time.[/]

Your Ahash rates are in line with my 1060 on Ahashpool these last two days (0.00026547 in 50 hours, so 0.127 mBTC/Day against your 0.128mBTC/Day)
And very good NH rates: 0.189 mBTC/Day. That's 47% increase.

Gelik

newbie

Activity: 21

Merit: 0

Still testing, post later with screens

puch0021

newbie

Activity: 35

Merit: 0

I'm stopping my test I've ran for 36 hours as the results are similar to what I had ran in January.

identical 1060 x 7 rigs
AHASHplus 0.12553203 -> 0.12687823 (difference of 0.0013462 in 36 hours).
AM with NH - 0 -> 0.00198541

I think only Ahash makes sense if you have graphics cards that excel at core dependent algorithms not offered on NH and also compared to ethash. For a 1060, ethereum mining is way ahead of pretty much any alt coin at this point in time.[/]

millsys

member

Activity: 112

Merit: 10

Quote from: millsys on February 28, 2018, 10:55:03 PM

Quote from: millsys on February 27, 2018, 10:49:31 PM

FULL 12 RIG 72 GPU NICEHASH TEST

Ok guys, I've switched one entire farm (72 GPUs, 12 rigs) over to NiceHash (2.0.1.11) - 48 HOUR TEST!!!!

https://imgur.com/a/vNodg

Last 3 Payouts on AHashPool (Use to be 0.021 at its peak)
19h ago   0.01532754   330b3de0606d1257621e51301da726f8ca02...
43h ago   0.01419105   87ce1e684a440868ea347bcde8766b5ac7f8...
2d ago   0.01409336   67db48c92b113c2c98fc62461144ad8399bd...

Lets see how it plays out compared to my AHashPoolPlus 62 GPU Farm

First 24 hours (2/28/2018):

Farm #1 (62 gpu) which is still using NemosMiner 2.5/NPlusMiner 1.3.3 on AhashPoolPlus produced .011531 BTC
Farm #2 (72 gpu) which is on NiceHash Miner v2.0.1.11 produced .01424642 BTC

Farm #2 Typically produces on the high side 14.8% better revenue, so if the 72 gpu farm was on AHashPool I would have expected .013237 best case

.01424642 - .013237 = 7.6% better revenue on NiceHash!

Lets see how the next 24 play out....

Well the second 24 hour wasn't as nice....
2/29/2018 Nicehash 0.01319923 while my 62 GPU on X17/AHashPool did 0.013345! Since the 72 gpu should have 14.8% better I would have expected 0.015320 if I was on AHashPool.

So after 48 hours, if left on X17/AHashPool we would be around 0.028557, but currently we are 0.02744565... Not the end of the world, .001 LESS on NiceHash so far after 48 hour test. Definitely not enough to make me cancel the testing so we'll continue the tests, keeping the 62 gpu on X17/AHashPool and 72 gpu on NiceHash to see if we just had a bad day on NiceHash.....

miner14

newbie

Activity: 32

Merit: 0

Quote from: cable_loco

Right after the params, like so

Code:

Cody stuff

Thanks CLoco, That took my CeleronG2930 in one rig down to 40% from 80%

If you have a ZenCash addy I'll send you £1's worth for that useful post. Cool

(and yes technically I'm trying to get rid of my old lame coins sorry Zen)

k2laci

member

Activity: 172

Merit: 10

Quote from: millsys on February 28, 2018, 10:55:03 PM

Quote from: millsys on February 27, 2018, 10:49:31 PM

FULL 12 RIG 72 GPU NICEHASH TEST

Ok guys, I've switched one entire farm (72 GPUs, 12 rigs) over to NiceHash (2.0.1.11) - 48 HOUR TEST!!!!

https://imgur.com/a/vNodg

Last 3 Payouts on AHashPool (Use to be 0.021 at its peak)
19h ago   0.01532754   330b3de0606d1257621e51301da726f8ca02...
43h ago   0.01419105   87ce1e684a440868ea347bcde8766b5ac7f8...
2d ago   0.01409336   67db48c92b113c2c98fc62461144ad8399bd...

Lets see how it plays out compared to my AHashPoolPlus 62 GPU Farm

First 24 hours (2/28/2018):

Farm #1 (62 gpu) which is still using NemosMiner 2.5/NPlusMiner 1.3.3 on AhashPoolPlus produced .011531 BTC
Farm #2 (72 gpu) which is on NiceHash Miner v2.0.1.11 produced .01424642 BTC

Farm #2 Typically produces on the high side 14.8% better revenue, so if the 72 gpu farm was on AHashPool I would have expected .013237 best case

.01424642 - .013237 = 7.6% better revenue on NiceHash!

Lets see how the next 24 play out....

Got the end result?

k2laci

member

Activity: 172

Merit: 10

I tested zergpool (nemosminer, zergpoolplus, 24h test.

Result (6x1070 GPU) :

https://imgur.com/e4t7ZKA

It's a disaster!

verado

newbie

Activity: 4

Merit: 0

Quote from: L0c0 on March 02, 2018, 03:05:44 AM

I've seen those cpu usage spikes from powershell since switching to 2.5.1, regardless of which miner is running at the moment. No idea what's causing them.

The miner is using too much cpu since the change to minerplus, if you run 3 instances in parallel, the host and hashrate is almost crashing under the load. Calculating a moving average can't be that hard. What is the miner doing with the cpu ressources?

cable_loco

jr. member

Activity: 35

Merit: 1

Quote from: vtrsp1 on March 02, 2018, 07:10:21 AM

Hi guys,

i Have a problem with bencmarking DTSM miner....when its starts up it see all 6 cards but when its benchmarking it sees only gpu 0,1??
when it benchmarking i see the command line and it says 2 gpu`s -d 0,1 ??

did is somthing wrong? or a bug in the program?

other benschmarks run fine

sorry for my bad englisch its a bit rusty Grin

All explained here:
https://github.com/nemosminer/NemosMiner-v2.5.2/blob/master/README.md

instructions:

edit startpoolname.bat

1.change BTC address to yours

2.select how many gpu's you have eg: (1gpu dstm 0 cc 0) (2gpu dstm 0 1 cc 0,1) (6gpu dstm 0 1 2 3 4 5 cc 0,1,2,3,4,5)

3.remove any algos you do not want to mine

4.save & run startpoolname.bat

So if you have 6 gpus, you need to edit your start file with the following.

Code:

-SelGPUDSTM '0 1 2 3 4 5' -SelGPUCC '0,1,2,3,4,5'

Topic: [NemosMiner] multi algo profit switching NVIDIA/CPU miner - page 42. (Read 289464 times)