Topic: New approach to signature campaign. - page 2. (Read 760 times)

Campaign managers are fully aware aware and familiar on the reputation of the members here and its not the ideology that the campaign managers are looking for; what managers are looking for is how they are active and knowledgeable on the topic on which they are participating in this forum, their behavior and status are what matter and this what generate leads for their clients.
And besides, there's a possibility of use of AI to come out with the best answer and even if participant has the best answer if he he is a spammer or a user of AI then its useless to use that format.

That might work, with a certain approach and method, but it shouldn't be called a signature campaign. Because the idea of Signature Campaign is for the participant to wear the signature that promote the project that pays them, while they are being active in the Bitcointalk forum, make the signature ads widely served to the other forum users. And this make the Bitcointalk signature campaign is unique to Bitcointalk, while OP's idea can be done anywhere outside the forum.

No, it seems that you missunderstood how exactly signature campaign works. You're not hired to be paid shill, they don't pay you to post positively about project. You're just renting your signature area.. It's like billboard on a highway.
Though, promoting something similar like vouching for project. If you will promote scam, you will have to take responsibility for it.

You are overthinking and trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist. Signature promotion is about making your profile's space available for certain services to be visible in. It's like owning real estate in an area with a lot of traffic and with a huge wallet where you can place advertisements. The more attractive the location, the bigger your wall, and the cheaper you are, the more offers you will get. There is no need for sweet talk and beautiful pitches.

Companies want their ads visible on the forum. Campaign managers select those participants who possess qualities to show those ads in attractive sections of the forum and in the right way. That's all it is.

What do you mean? there's nothing can restrict anyone to become a campaign manager, even a brand new account and not buy copper membership can become a manager. Some people will suggest to buy copper membership in order make the image visible, ask to hire experienced manager or ask to escrow the funds.

But, if that newbie run a campaign with the highest reward, have paid the first week cycle and can sign a message from address that contain a lot Bitcoin, I'm sure most of users will jump into that campaign.

Rank doesn't matter.

I wonder why some people are so much aggressive or unnecessarily nasty. What is off topic in this thread? I didn't know this board, a moderator moved my topic to this place, atleast I have known this board now. If there is anything off topic here, it is your reply. You did not put any good effort in writing it, you just want to bash me because I am not a senior (higher) user. If someone is to use their alt to say something, it should be something that is controversial and not an ordinary suggestion.

In all, there is a mixed reaction in this thread, some are honestly and objective, while some are so mean like i touched something that is so sacred in the forum.
Please note, I am nobody's alt account or farm account as you guys might call it.

I am reading something that is making sense to me. The words in bold. Anyone should be promoting something they vouch for or something they understand. If it is different here, there is no problem. I am not totally out of place. I just made a sincere suggestion. Some people said I should become a campaign manager to implement my suggestion, it is a joke because you they know I cannot become a campaign manager.

The managers know what they're doing, if you look at how they manage. Not everyone is posting bunch of walls of texts and they like more of those posts to be engaging and as-is, not forcing to be lengthy which many think to be quality. I think most of them likes organic posts but informative.

Don't forget the experience on Web3 to apply for the signature campaign. Lol
If a format like the OP is desired then more nonsense will be created in order to promote advertising.
I think it is enough with the existing format, the rest of the manager will judge the feasibility.

This is the "hard thing" I'm referring to.

When I say don't work hard, I don’t mean spamming—I mean enjoying the forum and being an organic poster. It’s up to the campaign managers to decide if you fit what they’re looking for. For example, if the signature campaign is for a casino, the manager will likely prioritize active gambling posters. But if it requires the poster to shill for the casino and constantly lurk in the ANN thread, it’s not good for the project. It starts to look like incentivized posts, which we all know is against the forum rules.

I’ve seen many gambling campaigns where members don’t even post in the casino’s ANN thread—Stake is a great example. They’ve been running a long time, and the company knows that exposure across different boards on the forum is much better than people just posting in one place.


Being aware and vouching for the service you’re promoting is important, but you don’t have to constantly show it. At least have knowledge about the project you’re promoting so you’re not left in the dark when it comes up in discussions. I’ve noticed this too—many campaigns on the forum are signature campaigns for a casino/sportsbook, and I’ve seen members staying in these campaigns even though they’re not gamblers.

When it comes to vouching for what you’re promoting, especially if you're in a signature for a gambling platform, it feels odd when some members post things like:

1-"Is gambling addictive?"
2-"Maybe we shouldn’t gamble because it ruins lives?"
3-"Honestly, I’ll never gamble, I’ll just keep the money I earn from my signature campaign earnings."

Posts like these seem annoying (to me), because it feels like the user is anti-gambling, yet they still choose to promote it. And then there’s the case of users whose religion considers gambling a sin, yet they’re part of a gambling signature campaign. How do you even explain that? It’s a contradiction that doesn’t sit well, and it raises questions about their sincerity in promoting the service.

Cool, it makes a signature campaign application harder than applying for the presidency of a country.

Seriously, it's even irrelevant for a signature campaign applicant to explain how he/she's going to promote the company. It's a signature campaign, right? Also, why should a signature campaign participant worry about how to establish the brand in the forum? That's the job of a manager. That's the reason why there are campaign rules and a stringent process to vet applicants.

If you're the campaign manager, will you spend 3-4 hours of your time reading all of what the applicants will be saying? Also take note that there's also a thing called "AI" where they can just use it to give a 199-word paragraph on how they would promote the company.

Main point is that, as much as I want to agree with you, I will not spend hours and hours reading what other people are saying. I would like to see a change in getting new applicants for signature campaign although I don't know what it would be, and it's up to the campaign manager at the end of the day. As a person, it's pretty normal to be lazy at things. Just stop. That's would I want to say. Ideology? Opportunity to express themselves? AI can do it for them, and basically, the manager just wasted his time reading an essay that's been written by a bot.

Now I will ask you OP. Let's say that you're the campaign manager, will you spend hours and hours reading every single essay or paragraph that those participants will be saying? Also take note that in every campaign, there's an average of around 100 more or less applicants that are applying especially those new ones. Even you already know that more than half of them will just use AI. Just have a life OP.

I have a better suggestion. Let the managers contact Floxynice to select campaign participants for them.

Why do people deal with someone else's business? if you know better, be free and start it according to your own rules. Piece of cake.

It should be harder to be honest man. If it's made harder to get a spot in campaigns, maybe so many spammers won't be hired. I was always told getting a spot in a campaign is a privilege.

IMO if you are promoting a brand in your sig space, you are in a sense vouching for that service. If you do not believe in the service, you shouldn't be promoting it just because they are willing to hire you. Just my thoughts at least on the issue.

I agree that something new needs to be used, not sure if the OPs thought is what needs done, but I wouldn't be opposed to something new.

Lol you should have seen where OP originally posted this topic before it was moved by the moderators. I think they made the right call, the topic fits right here in this board. If the OP is truly part of an alt farm, he will eventually slip and get caught one day. There are already eyes on the account and making useless posts like this only increases suspicions about the account.

Lol, no. You'd be spamming the forum and such actions would backfire real fast-- pretty much how bitget has been hated by several members because of the bitget spammers lol. The main focus should be engaging/starting good discussions which are likely to be read by others.


See: [Guide] Factors to consider before joining paid signature campaigns.

Another off topic, thread, reason being that, this suggestion have nothing to do with project management a d promotion and also a signature campaign manager, just a baseless idealogy from an alt of someone who doesn't have the ball to post this with their real account.

Will the manager get better results, than a member's reputation on the forum if he is going to implement this? One member may have a good answer but if he lacks the status and the reputation to go along with it, what's the use of that good answer?
The current format is already good and effective; its really up to the appreciation of the manager, for who gets the privilege to get into the campaign.

Some people are just too serious for life…lol

Your post history is what the manager bases on to choose if you are suitable for the task, not some 200-word easy. I could make a sweet 200 word easy using ChatGPT, yet my post history is way so shitty or not in the boards the campaign manager expects me to post in.

The manager doesn't have to do this; they just need to look on the applicant's posting history and status on the forum, All they need is visibility of their banner on the applicant's account, not the ideology of the people.

And the answer is already given on the members' activity on the forum, We don't need this question and answer portion when applying because the manager is actually looking at the member's authority, reputation, and activity on the forum not to see how well they will answer the question given.
I don't think manager will ever use this format; they know better just by looking on the member's behavior here.