yeah, reopen your client with -rescan
Anyone else seen weird fork like activity? Mine doesn't seem to have missed a beat.
Topic: [NEW CURRENCY] Maria 2.0 was banned, here is her proof. The birth of Bytecoin! - page 25. (Read 106432 times)
April 08, 2013, 06:23:20 PM
April 08, 2013, 06:19:49 PM
Thanks but I do not understood: this morining these transactions had at least 1000 confirmations. It is not enough ?
lol, no if the tx had 1000 confirmations than your txs definitely didnt get orphaned. I would try reindexing, you probably still have the coins, its probably a problem with your client displaying incorrect information.
April 08, 2013, 06:14:33 PM
Thanks but I do not understood: this morining these transactions had at least 1000 confirmations. It is not enough ?
April 08, 2013, 05:56:59 PM
Weird this coin
This morning I had 12 byte coin with 34 transaction.
This evening it dropped to 1.9, and 3.5 became unconfirmed (they were confirmed this morning)
When I look at the transacion history I only see 19 transactions. Some of them disapppeared.
This morning I had 12 byte coin with 34 transaction.
This evening it dropped to 1.9, and 3.5 became unconfirmed (they were confirmed this morning)
When I look at the transacion history I only see 19 transactions. Some of them disapppeared.
With a chain this new i would definitely recommend waiting for quite a few confirmations before you count your eggs.
April 08, 2013, 05:54:25 PM
Weird this coin
This morning I had 12 byte coin with 34 transaction.
This evening it dropped to 1.9, and 3.5 became unconfirmed (they were confirmed this morning)
When I look at the transacion history I only see 19 transactions. Some of them disapppeared.
This morning I had 12 byte coin with 34 transaction.
This evening it dropped to 1.9, and 3.5 became unconfirmed (they were confirmed this morning)
When I look at the transacion history I only see 19 transactions. Some of them disapppeared.
April 08, 2013, 03:06:02 PM
Started a new topic about that:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bytecoin-stuck-at-block-14203-170715
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bytecoin-stuck-at-block-14203-170715
April 08, 2013, 03:04:45 PM
Client stuck on: "blocks" : 14203
I can see that one of the pools is there too: http://pool.bytecoin.in/stats_netw.php
Interesting phenomena, fork ?!
I can see that one of the pools is there too: http://pool.bytecoin.in/stats_netw.php
Interesting phenomena, fork ?!
Who knows? Ppl always call something unusual "a fork".
April 08, 2013, 02:57:57 PM
Client stuck on: "blocks" : 14203
I can see that one of the pools is there too: http://pool.bytecoin.in/stats_netw.php
Interesting phenomena, fork ?!
I can see that one of the pools is there too: http://pool.bytecoin.in/stats_netw.php
Interesting phenomena, fork ?!
April 08, 2013, 02:31:18 PM
What does everyone think about having a 'bytecoin gem', pretty much the same concept as the bitcoin gem site?
I may consider making this if there is enough public interest for it
Nice concept, take my +1 to it. I may consider making this if there is enough public interest for it
April 08, 2013, 12:33:47 PM
What does everyone think about having a 'bytecoin gem', pretty much the same concept as the bitcoin gem site?
I may consider making this if there is enough public interest for it
I may consider making this if there is enough public interest for it
April 08, 2013, 10:30:41 AM
First question: No, we are not working on the second block found by the pool, we are working on the second block found today, as the difficulty is quite high for our hash power. (We have found over 130 blocks so far)
This pool pays out over an average of about 48000 shares, so if you left now, you would be paid for the shares you have submitted so far, until they were pushed out of the chain by new shares (You can be paid multiple times for each share)
This pool pays out over an average of about 48000 shares, so if you left now, you would be paid for the shares you have submitted so far, until they were pushed out of the chain by new shares (You can be paid multiple times for each share)
Great thanks! That clears things up.
April 08, 2013, 09:51:29 AM
Lucas,
One more question - just looking at the pool stats, and trying to understand it all (most I do). I'm only confused about the block part. Are we really only working on the 2nd block every found by the pool? I didn't realize it took so long to find block even with the hashing rate we're putting out.
Also, I'm currently "2nd" on the list for highest payout if the block is found - if I stopped mining right now, would I lose that payout percentage? I'm just not sure how this type of pool works (I've only ever mined in PPS pools).
One more question - just looking at the pool stats, and trying to understand it all (most I do). I'm only confused about the block part. Are we really only working on the 2nd block every found by the pool? I didn't realize it took so long to find block even with the hashing rate we're putting out.
Also, I'm currently "2nd" on the list for highest payout if the block is found - if I stopped mining right now, would I lose that payout percentage? I'm just not sure how this type of pool works (I've only ever mined in PPS pools).
First question: No, we are not working on the second block found by the pool, we are working on the second block found today, as the difficulty is quite high for our hash power. (We have found over 130 blocks so far)
This pool pays out over an average of about 48000 shares, so if you left now, you would be paid for the shares you have submitted so far, until they were pushed out of the chain by new shares (You can be paid multiple times for each share)
April 08, 2013, 09:47:51 AM
Lucas,
One more question - just looking at the pool stats, and trying to understand it all (most I do). I'm only confused about the block part. Are we really only working on the 2nd block every found by the pool? I didn't realize it took so long to find block even with the hashing rate we're putting out.
Also, I'm currently "2nd" on the list for highest payout if the block is found - if I stopped mining right now, would I lose that payout percentage? I'm just not sure how this type of pool works (I've only ever mined in PPS pools).
One more question - just looking at the pool stats, and trying to understand it all (most I do). I'm only confused about the block part. Are we really only working on the 2nd block every found by the pool? I didn't realize it took so long to find block even with the hashing rate we're putting out.
Also, I'm currently "2nd" on the list for highest payout if the block is found - if I stopped mining right now, would I lose that payout percentage? I'm just not sure how this type of pool works (I've only ever mined in PPS pools).
April 08, 2013, 09:24:45 AM
Oh, I apologise, I meant to change it before, but I must have forgot in the rush to publish it
Should be changed in a minute.
EDIT: Changed for the faucet and the pool
Should be changed in a minute.
EDIT: Changed for the faucet and the pool
Yes! My Chrome tabs are happy
April 08, 2013, 08:50:04 AM
Lucas
Just stupid aesthetic thing for your pool site - can you change your "favicon" for your site to the bytecoin icon?
I have it "pinned" in my Chrome, and it looks boring with the plain white page icon! Hahhaa
Reject rate is 10%, not horrible. I could probably tweak it with difficulty. Too lazy now that it's working better :-P
Just stupid aesthetic thing for your pool site - can you change your "favicon" for your site to the bytecoin icon?
I have it "pinned" in my Chrome, and it looks boring with the plain white page icon! Hahhaa
Reject rate is 10%, not horrible. I could probably tweak it with difficulty. Too lazy now that it's working better :-P
Oh, I apologise, I meant to change it before, but I must have forgot in the rush to publish it
Should be changed in a minute.
EDIT: Changed for the faucet and the pool
April 08, 2013, 08:47:47 AM
Lucas
Just stupid aesthetic thing for your pool site - can you change your "favicon" for your site to the bytecoin icon?
I have it "pinned" in my Chrome, and it looks boring with the plain white page icon! Hahhaa
Reject rate is 10%, not horrible. I could probably tweak it with difficulty. Too lazy now that it's working better :-P
Just stupid aesthetic thing for your pool site - can you change your "favicon" for your site to the bytecoin icon?
I have it "pinned" in my Chrome, and it looks boring with the plain white page icon! Hahhaa
Reject rate is 10%, not horrible. I could probably tweak it with difficulty. Too lazy now that it's working better :-P
April 08, 2013, 08:32:18 AM
Since we're still waiting for an exchange, I setup an orderbook here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitsnbytes-a-live-bitcoinbytecoin-orderbook-170157
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitsnbytes-a-live-bitcoinbytecoin-orderbook-170157
Looks pretty nice
I'll register now. April 08, 2013, 08:28:59 AM
Seems to be accepting more, less rejects.
CGminer still shows "diff 1" and many of the accepted shares are 1/1 or 2/1 - is it still pulling 20 diff shares?
Accepted rate is definitely better though. i.e. 32/5 now. instead of 30/20 like it was before
CGminer still shows "diff 1" and many of the accepted shares are 1/1 or 2/1 - is it still pulling 20 diff shares?
Accepted rate is definitely better though. i.e. 32/5 now. instead of 30/20 like it was before
Oh, that changes the pool difficulty, it can be quite hard to understand at first.
Examples of usernames:
username = use default server shares and local share difficulty
username/1000 = use difficulty 1000 shares for server shares and default share difficulty
username/650+4 = use difficulty 650 server shares and 4 difficulty local shares
Try using username/800+10 (or whatever local share difficulty you want)
April 08, 2013, 08:23:07 AM
Since we're still waiting for an exchange, I setup an orderbook here:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitsnbytes-a-live-bitcoinbytecoin-orderbook-170157
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitsnbytes-a-live-bitcoinbytecoin-orderbook-170157
April 08, 2013, 08:20:06 AM
Getting a boat load of "Strarum from pool 0 requested work restart" - any idea what that means?
Of course the miner I'm throwing at it only hashes at 190 Mh/s. I didn't throw my main rig at it.
That seems perfectly normal, the pool holds it's own lower difficulty blockchain, and adjusts the share difficulty so that a share is generated every 10 seconds on average. Each share counts as a 'block' in the easier blockchain, so you miner needs to get new work each time a share is recieved by the server.
Gotcha. I put my main rig on it now, so hashing at 1.4 Gh/s. Also about 50%-75% reject rate, is that normal as well? Is it due to the low difficulty?
Hmm, the reject rate shouldn't be that high, try adding /20 to the end of your username and see if that helps (Should request difficulty 20 shares instead, feel free to change the number)
E.g. 8adiaZcaVjiE4vXkztRaLMrSDikPuY8grc/20
Seems to be accepting more, less rejects.
CGminer still shows "diff 1" and many of the accepted shares are 1/1 or 2/1 - is it still pulling 20 diff shares?
Accepted rate is definitely better though. i.e. 32/5 now. instead of 30/20 like it was before
Jump to: