New (more optimized) MRO CPUMiner [Updated 05/28/2014] [PROOF OF 2X INCREASE]

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: btcshop on May 30, 2014, 07:35:58 AM

Quote from: B.T.Coin on May 29, 2014, 07:15:19 AM

Quote from: drawingthesun on May 29, 2014, 06:43:56 AM

Latest release "cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-29-2014" fails on Win 7 64-bit.

minerd.exe crashes.

I have the same problem too on processors that do not have AES-NI

I have the same problem too on I3 3240 processors!

http://ark.intel.com/products/65690/Intel-Core-i3-3240-Processor-3M-Cache-3_40-GHz

Near the bottom. See?

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: coinfusion on May 29, 2014, 07:57:10 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on May 29, 2014, 07:19:04 AM

Well, yeah. The binary was built for processors with AES-NI - there have been no improvements to non AES-NI code yet.

EDIT: Also, the little to no increase in Windows is likely due to Windows having no mmap() function. Therefore I cannot use hugepages (or prefault aforementioned hugepages.)

If you want to damage your brain (even more than if you were to continue your sleep-depravation routine Cheesy

) you could try out using CreateFileMapping / VirtualAlloc and friends on Windows to grab some huge pages. The brain will start to hurt when the windows users complain about it not running without them doing some setup work.

I tried VirtualAlloc and had people test - some said better, some said worse.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: Febo on May 29, 2014, 12:24:17 PM

have win 64 and used new miner, and i get that: Stratum connection failed: Couldnt resolve host 'monero.crypto-pool.fr'

I used same batch command as with old miner, just changed path a bit:

C:\Monero\Wolf\minerd.exe -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://monero.crypto-pool.fr:6666 -u 47mqJC8hHQ65TmSiDnKN9scsqtKzTwQLLLroTboyKtHsR69m6BGYsA1ZkeTWguqzr59tbnJ3GrKjphS WUdQ8XW8kRf8bYmJ -p x -t 4

Weird, I thought I fixed that. Try using its IP? (62.210.78.186)

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: B.T.Coin on May 29, 2014, 07:15:19 AM

Quote from: drawingthesun on May 29, 2014, 06:43:56 AM

Latest release "cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-29-2014" fails on Win 7 64-bit.

minerd.exe crashes.

I have the same problem too on processors that do not have AES-NI

Well, yeah. The binary was built for processors with AES-NI - there have been no improvements to non AES-NI code yet.

EDIT: Also, the little to no increase in Windows is likely due to Windows having no mmap() function. Therefore I cannot use hugepages (or prefault aforementioned hugepages.)

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: djm34 on May 29, 2014, 06:40:00 AM

I don't want to be a dick, but the OP page is certainly the most confusing I ever read...
A readme file would be good too.

You're not being a dick, it's really disorganized and confusing. Sorry.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: followtheboss on May 29, 2014, 06:02:06 AM

Hello there is tutorial for newbies on ubuntu linux for using your miner ?
It will be appreciated.

cheers

I believe davidlatapie has one - it's more or less the same as the original cpuminer.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: carloss on May 29, 2014, 05:04:16 AM

Hello! I upgraded and recompiled your miner yesterday and it was killed during the night by OOM, because it allocated too much memory:

Code:

May 29 04:04:05 r9miner kernel: [139346.544675] Out of memory: Kill process 7085 (minerd) score 963 or sacrifice child
May 29 04:04:05 r9miner kernel: [139346.544683] Killed process 7085 (minerd) total-vm:16834832kB, anon-rss:7668368kB, file-rss:0kB

Last messages in the screen:

Code:

[2014-05-29 03:57:00] Stratum detected new block
[2014-05-29 03:57:00] thread 3: 1602 hashes, 42.69 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:57:00] thread 5: 255 hashes, 43.23 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:57:00] thread 4: 1602 hashes, 42.69 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:57:00] thread 6: 1200 hashes, 44.02 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:57:00] thread 2: 1626 hashes, 43.32 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:57:00] thread 1: 1626 hashes, 43.31 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:57:00] thread 0: 1604 hashes, 42.72 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:57:20] Stratum detected new block
[2014-05-29 03:57:20] thread 6: 880 hashes, 42.75 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:57:20] thread 0: 896 hashes, 43.57 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:57:20] thread 4: 904 hashes, 43.92 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:57:20] thread 5: 889 hashes, 43.18 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:57:20] thread 3: 890 hashes, 43.22 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:57:20] thread 2: 902 hashes, 43.83 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:57:20] thread 1: 917 hashes, 44.58 H/s
[2014-05-29 03:59:36] Stratum connection timed out
[2014-05-29 04:00:13] Stratum connection interrupted
Killed

Any idea?

Yep - known bug, and fixed bug. Re-clone and rebuild.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: coinfusion on May 28, 2014, 09:35:07 PM

Quote from: Wolf0 on May 28, 2014, 04:41:55 PM

Code:

./autogen.sh && CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure && make

And NOTHING ELSE - there are very good GCC flags built in and used by default.

you have -falign-loops=16 twice in there, and -fsplit-ivs-in-unroller is enabled by default in gcc4.4+ Cheesy

Do I? I've been awake for like three days - I'll fix it lol

Wow, I also had both -O3 and -Ofast. I need some sleep.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: juve4v on May 28, 2014, 04:23:51 PM

Ubuntu 14.04, I 4770k diff 10k on moneropool.com, I get same hr as simpleminer.

First, do you have AES-NI? Second, are you using only 7 threads? And third, try using the following to build:

Code:

./autogen.sh && CFLAGS="-march=native" ./configure && make

And NOTHING ELSE - there are very good GCC flags built in and used by default.

Wolf0

member

Activity: 81

Merit: 1002

It was only the wind.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: NeuroticFish on May 28, 2014, 11:46:19 AM

Is it faster for all CPU or only for the ones with AES-NI?

Non AES-NI implementation is deprecated. I won't make any more improvements to it, at least not without incentive.

I got an offer to be paid for the non AES-NI implementation... guess I'm on that next.

btcshop

hero member

Activity: 644

Merit: 500

Quote from: B.T.Coin on May 29, 2014, 07:15:19 AM

Quote from: drawingthesun on May 29, 2014, 06:43:56 AM

Latest release "cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-29-2014" fails on Win 7 64-bit.

minerd.exe crashes.

I have the same problem too on processors that do not have AES-NI

I have the same problem too on I3 3240 processors!

opossum

hero member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1000

I don't see any speed improvement, cpu is 3570k.
Solo mining with minerd, is it possible?

restless

legendary

Activity: 1151

Merit: 1001

Quote from: Wolf0 on May 29, 2014, 07:19:04 AM

Quote from: B.T.Coin on May 29, 2014, 07:15:19 AM

Quote from: drawingthesun on May 29, 2014, 06:43:56 AM

Latest release "cpuminer-multi-wolf-05-29-2014" fails on Win 7 64-bit.

minerd.exe crashes.

I have the same problem too on processors that do not have AES-NI

Well, yeah. The binary was built for processors with AES-NI - there have been no improvements to non AES-NI code yet.

EDIT: Also, the little to no increase in Windows is likely due to Windows having no mmap() function. Therefore I cannot use hugepages (or prefault aforementioned hugepages.)

I believe yam miner uses Windows analog of huge pages

coinfusion

full member

Activity: 141

Merit: 100

Quote from: Wolf0 on May 29, 2014, 07:19:04 AM

Well, yeah. The binary was built for processors with AES-NI - there have been no improvements to non AES-NI code yet.

EDIT: Also, the little to no increase in Windows is likely due to Windows having no mmap() function. Therefore I cannot use hugepages (or prefault aforementioned hugepages.)

If you want to damage your brain (even more than if you were to continue your sleep-depravation routine Cheesy

) you could try out using CreateFileMapping / VirtualAlloc and friends on Windows to grab some huge pages. The brain will start to hurt when the windows users complain about it not running without them doing some setup work.

Trimegistus

legendary

Activity: 1565

Merit: 1027

Quote from: Wolf0 on May 29, 2014, 07:19:04 AM

Well, yeah. The binary was built for processors with AES-NI - there have been no improvements to non AES-NI code yet.

EDIT: Also, the little to no increase in Windows is likely due to Windows having no mmap() function. Therefore I cannot use hugepages (or prefault aforementioned hugepages.)

I can't see any real increase on the hashrate on my Windows 8.1 x64... Will it be it worth the effort to use this new miner on a Linux virtual machine?

Will I get the 2x (or similar) increase by running the miner inside a unix OS?

Febo

legendary

Activity: 2744

Merit: 1288

Works now

Febo

legendary

Activity: 2744

Merit: 1288

have win 64 and used new miner, and i get that: Stratum connection failed: Couldnt resolve host 'monero.crypto-pool.fr'

I used same batch command as with old miner, just changed path a bit:

C:\Monero\Wolf\minerd.exe -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://monero.crypto-pool.fr:6666 -u 47mqJC8hHQ65TmSiDnKN9scsqtKzTwQLLLroTboyKtHsR69m6BGYsA1ZkeTWguqzr59tbnJ3GrKjphS WUdQ8XW8kRf8bYmJ -p x -t 4

followtheboss

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100