I have been mining on this pool for a while now, but recently switched to the X11 pool because of diminishing profits. X11 seemed to be a lot more profitable, based on the estimated btc/day. But now that I have been mining for a week or so, it seems like the estimated btc/day is off by quite a lot? It's telling me I should be getting about 0.0014 a day per MH, but I am putting in more than twice the amount of MH's (this is reported correctly on the site too) and I am not getting 0.0014 a day by a long shot. In fact based on my last payout, the amount of MHs and the time it took to gather it, my calculations show I'm actually getting only 0,0001485790625 BTC/day, which is TEN TIMES lower than the estimated value. I've got no HW errors and a very reasonable reject rate. What's going on? Is the estimated btc/day counter just off, or is something wrong with my system? I haven't mined x11 before so I can't really compare to anything.
For reference, my account is 1FHxvCF2DrcyMYns6DZpPm3vAMw8G74XYg
Topic: New profit-switching mining pool with nightly bonus payout-- CoinSolver.com (Read 23429 times)
July 27, 2014, 05:23:38 PM
July 24, 2014, 05:21:08 PM
Can you please payout my balance?
I testet your pool for 12 hours a few weeks ago an till then i try here and there to reach minimum payout threshold with a few hours of mining every other day.
But every time my few thousand shares get lost and my balance does'nt grow bigger.
So please payout my 0.0008 BTC (i know it is not much but it is not about the amount but about principles)
My adress is "13q7oxGF6qL2BUFWVnDT7n7nY5wn1hhiX2"
I testet your pool for 12 hours a few weeks ago an till then i try here and there to reach minimum payout threshold with a few hours of mining every other day.
But every time my few thousand shares get lost and my balance does'nt grow bigger.
So please payout my 0.0008 BTC (i know it is not much but it is not about the amount but about principles)
My adress is "13q7oxGF6qL2BUFWVnDT7n7nY5wn1hhiX2"
July 09, 2014, 07:20:34 PM
Hi, i am on scrypt-n, i've got my payment at 12:26am, contact Vt on irc, he would help. cya pal
Luthor
Luthor
July 08, 2014, 11:03:19 PM
Anyone mining on the the ScryptN pool? No payments for nearly 48 Hrs and the graph looks flat. Do any of you have the same issues?
July 01, 2014, 11:23:14 AM
Just FYI to anyone running GAW ASICS. I am new as of a day or so ago and just read the last few posts here.
I am using a cgminer 3.7.2 with Gridseeds support for my 4 g-blades and 10 seeds and then I am using the most current cgminer 4.3.5 with Zeus support for 8 Fury's and 2 Black Widows. Connected to the normal port 3333 I believe and I am not having any real issues. These are on Raspberry Pi's. I assume the newest cgminer for the GAW devices is working well now when it was not before for this pool. All 4 different miner types are using the same BTC address and have the same diff set as required.
Current HashRate 62.86 Gh
Today's Accepted Shares 40087552
Today's Rejected Shares 329728 (0.8%)
I am using a cgminer 3.7.2 with Gridseeds support for my 4 g-blades and 10 seeds and then I am using the most current cgminer 4.3.5 with Zeus support for 8 Fury's and 2 Black Widows. Connected to the normal port 3333 I believe and I am not having any real issues. These are on Raspberry Pi's. I assume the newest cgminer for the GAW devices is working well now when it was not before for this pool. All 4 different miner types are using the same BTC address and have the same diff set as required.
Current HashRate 62.86 Gh
Today's Accepted Shares 40087552
Today's Rejected Shares 329728 (0.8%)
June 29, 2014, 01:15:31 PM
well port 4444 is working awesome. my rig hasn't dipped below 7mh/s for the 2 hours ive been on it so far. its much more stable. before it was very erratic and would dip down to 5mh/s.
Great, good to hear
June 29, 2014, 11:50:08 AM
well port 4444 is working awesome. my rig hasn't dipped below 7mh/s for the 2 hours ive been on it so far. its much more stable. before it was very erratic and would dip down to 5mh/s.
June 29, 2014, 10:45:35 AM
so which ports should we be using? i have 5 GAW furys. someone on hashtrader.com told me to try port 4444 because its more compatible with the GAW miners. then i come here and see port 5555? confused.
Edit: im using the latest version of CGminer 4.3.5. compiled it last night.
Edit: im using the latest version of CGminer 4.3.5. compiled it last night.
As far as I know: Use 3333, if you have connection issues use 4444, and on either of them if your reject rate is quite high try 5555.
June 29, 2014, 10:09:39 AM
so which ports should we be using? i have 5 GAW furys. someone on hashtrader.com told me to try port 4444 because its more compatible with the GAW miners. then i come here and see port 5555? confused.
Edit: im using the latest version of CGminer 4.3.5. compiled it last night.
Edit: im using the latest version of CGminer 4.3.5. compiled it last night.
June 26, 2014, 08:24:39 PM
X11 pool is in the works! Anyone interested in trying it out?
**It is use at your own risk right now, x11 is beta**
**It is use at your own risk right now, x11 is beta**
June 25, 2014, 06:29:02 AM
i also had very high rejections on coinsolver.
i resolved this with a diff of 256 (password set as d=256) . i used coinsolver.com:5555
and for 24 hours , i got only 11% rejection , i tested with 3 fury , and they all give me the same percentage.
it is a huge improvement as i was having 25% two days ago with a diff of 512 , i also tried with vardiff without success
hope it helps
i resolved this with a diff of 256 (password set as d=256) . i used coinsolver.com:5555
and for 24 hours , i got only 11% rejection , i tested with 3 fury , and they all give me the same percentage.
it is a huge improvement as i was having 25% two days ago with a diff of 512 , i also tried with vardiff without success
hope it helps
Great to hear
June 25, 2014, 04:44:32 AM
i also had very high rejections on coinsolver.
i resolved this with a diff of 256 (password set as d=256) . i used coinsolver.com:5555
and for 24 hours , i got only 11% rejection , i tested with 3 fury , and they all give me the same percentage.
it is a huge improvement as i was having 25% two days ago with a diff of 512 , i also tried with vardiff without success
hope it helps
i resolved this with a diff of 256 (password set as d=256) . i used coinsolver.com:5555
and for 24 hours , i got only 11% rejection , i tested with 3 fury , and they all give me the same percentage.
it is a huge improvement as i was having 25% two days ago with a diff of 512 , i also tried with vardiff without success
hope it helps
June 23, 2014, 06:44:04 PM
I made a few 12 hour test runs on multiple pools. So after 12 hours on your pool 5 days ago i still have immature balance. How is this possible?
Absolutely no coin needs 5 days to mature. Thanks!
btw my BTC adress: 13q7oxGF6qL2BUFWVnDT7n7nY5wn1hhiX2
Absolutely no coin needs 5 days to mature. Thanks!
btw my BTC adress: 13q7oxGF6qL2BUFWVnDT7n7nY5wn1hhiX2
June 23, 2014, 09:25:33 AM
2.3 Mh/s should get what amount in bitcoins per day with scrypt-N mining?
Is it better than 4Mh/s of scrypt mining?
Thanks!
Is it better than 4Mh/s of scrypt mining?
Thanks!
June 20, 2014, 08:59:23 AM
i cant use coinsolver for more that 12-14 hours. after that my miners all show "sick" status. i really want to use coinsolver but it just wont work with Zenminer/zencontroller or hashra controla. both are based off of CGMiner 3.1.1.
As I have just started with CS after leaving CL I noticed they same, rejected shares around %21, stale shares and above target shares. Im running six fury's with normal set up to USB hub to PC. I moved over to the test port 5555, so far okay but have only been mining it for about 1hr. Not sure what the fix would be for the fury's, would love to only get .2% -%5 rejection rate! LOL! Not sure if its the cgminer 3.1.1 since my config does not use the --scrypt in it. Or the pool can't handle the hashrate.
Not sure. Difficulty is set to 512 as per default for the pool, so maybe increasing that would help, what are you guys thoughts and recommendations?:)I'm happy with CS because of the transparency!
*UPDATE* So I let my miners run on the new port 5555, still high rejection rate, and now I see rejected worker temporarily banned..Miner SICK!!! OMG this is crazy! The constant shutting down and restarting is really killing me!
I've been dealing with this on coinsolver as well. Ive tried everything i can think of. it just doesn't work. what mining software are you using?
June 19, 2014, 05:08:38 PM
i cant use coinsolver for more that 12-14 hours. after that my miners all show "sick" status. i really want to use coinsolver but it just wont work with Zenminer/zencontroller or hashra controla. both are based off of CGMiner 3.1.1.
As I have just started with CS after leaving CL I noticed they same, rejected shares around %21, stale shares and above target shares. Im running six fury's with normal set up to USB hub to PC. I moved over to the test port 5555, so far okay but have only been mining it for about 1hr. Not sure what the fix would be for the fury's, would love to only get .2% -%5 rejection rate! LOL! Not sure if its the cgminer 3.1.1 since my config does not use the --scrypt in it. Or the pool can't handle the hashrate.
Not sure. Difficulty is set to 512 as per default for the pool, so maybe increasing that would help, what are you guys thoughts and recommendations?:)I'm happy with CS because of the transparency!
*UPDATE* So I let my miners run on the new port 5555, still high rejection rate, and now I see rejected worker temporarily banned..Miner SICK!!! OMG this is crazy! The constant shutting down and restarting is really killing me!
June 19, 2014, 10:28:15 AM
You could try to use my stratum proxy between your miners and coinsolver: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/new-stratumgetwork-proxy-with-web-based-gui-and-pools-management-611338
(it is easy to use and it just needs java)
(it is easy to use and it just needs java)
June 19, 2014, 10:03:35 AM
i cant use coinsolver for more that 12-14 hours. after that my miners all show "sick" status. i really want to use coinsolver but it just wont work with Zenminer/zencontroller or hashra controla. both are based off of CGMiner 3.1.1.
June 19, 2014, 02:29:48 AM
It is an error in the stratum response of coinsolver: {"error": null, "id": 1284 "result": true}. A comma is missing between the id and the result. Looks like a bug in the stratum implementation of coinsolver.
June 19, 2014, 02:24:22 AM
Looks like an error in the JSON of your conf file. Can you post the text of cgminer.conf as is at the moment.
Jump to: