Pages:
Author

Topic: New Ways of Ranking System (Suggestions Only) - page 2. (Read 550 times)

legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
September 17, 2018, 09:17:08 PM
#4


Same with this guy:
Regarding to the new rules of forum about ranking. I concern someone will trade merit on another website by many ways.
How to detect and prevent that?

Where were all these newbies when we were all discussing changes to bitcointalk in Meta for the past few months?  They sure didn't seem to care before changes were actually made.
hero member
Activity: 1708
Merit: 541
September 17, 2018, 09:16:38 PM
#3
Hello Guys. I have been thinking about this for awhile, merit system is kinda good so that many members in here will strive to write or reply a non-shit posts and also to avoid those account farming but merit system has it flaws because a lot of members here were merit-farming although we have some members here too monitoring those ill-activities but still ,it isnt enough. I have this idea about ranking system without the help of merit. It goes like this.
Merit farming has not become an issue so far in my opinion. As you can see now there are thousands of high-activity accounts stuck in Newbie rank because they can't even earn 1 merit. Sure merit farming is still happening here and there, but its effect isn't really that big of a trouble. Remember that for every 1 merit you receive, you can only send half of it.


Im suggesting to bring back the old type of ranking system but this time the posts of every members of the forum should be monitored first before it can be converted into "ACTIVITY"
If you think that some members that monitors merit farming isn't enough, how can you expect them to monitor every posts of every members? That's just not feasible.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18748
September 17, 2018, 09:14:43 PM
#2
Given that this is your first ever post on meta, and it just so happened to come on the same day that you lost the ability to spam the forum with your bounty campaign, I'm gonna go out on a limb here and call this a poorly disguised beg for merit.

Regardless, it would be far too much work for the mods. Additionally, if we did have the man power to manually review every post before it was posted, why would we let the spam through but remove its activity? Why would we not just trash all the spam before it was ever posted?

jr. member
Activity: 99
Merit: 1
September 17, 2018, 08:57:56 PM
#1
Hello Guys. I have been thinking about this for awhile, merit system is kinda good so that many members in here will strive to write or reply a non-shit posts and also to avoid those account farming but merit system has it flaws because a lot of members here were merit-farming although we have some members here too monitoring those ill-activities but still ,it isnt enough. I have this idea about ranking system without the help of merit. It goes like this.

Every posts of all the members in these forum will be monitored by the moderators in every topic. All those "bounty reports and related to it, those non-sense one/two liners, off-topics, super poor english grammar and so on and so forth will be counted as POSTS but it wont be included and counted as an ACTIVITY, and each rank for example, just an example Jr. Member needs at least 30 activities, Member needs 70, Full Member needs 160 bla bla bla.

Im suggesting to bring back the old type of ranking system but this time the posts of every members of the forum should be monitored first before it can be converted into "ACTIVITY"

Im just suggesting. Long live bitcointalk.org God bless to all and thanks
Pages:
Jump to: