Pages:
Author

Topic: New web Wallet Staking system JustStake.Online IS CLOSING DOWN - page 8. (Read 7416 times)

newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
been thinking about htis...

Id settle for a monthly subscription and payment by coinpayments or summit like that so theres the chance to pay for it out of stake proffit
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1003
NodeMasters
Hi Guys
we have Added today 
eMarks
PotCoin
TekCoin
VeriCoin


Also we weil be doing a few updates  to the site  tonight
No downtime is expected  but you might see a few strange boxes 

Thanks
Paul
hero member
Activity: 736
Merit: 500
We talking monthly?
We can do it like that but I think yearly is better
My opinion is that the payment should be based on your actual "production" and in the produced currency, this is the only way for end user to know he will get some profits no matter what.
Then provide the option on a monthly fee, in BTC or USD.
Pegging the price to BTC/USD gives the user more troubles calculating what he would end up with in the end.

This is more complex solution, but most fair from what i can see.
You only pay for what you produce/stake independent on BTC/USD fluctations.

IW

I think you havnt been reading the posts on here or the little information on there site, there objective is to drive down the cost we pay to stake down our coins, if they can do it for less energy than we consume, were fundamentally better off regardless of a stakes "proffitability" driving down costs can go along way into driving up profitability.

price wise, i calculated my computer costs me about $65 a year in electric, remaining on almost 24/7 for staking, id prolly be willing to pay half that and switch my computer of for 18hours a day....... gonna be each to there own i guess, how much are there investments worth and can they justify the cost, well if yoru computers on 24/7 i can justify it. Its called a no brainer.
I did read everything here and on their page, and also about their masternode services and exchange.
I think it is you that did not understand what i was writing.

I like how they want to push down the price for the end user, keep going that route.

IW

I think I get what you are saying. Have 2 options.  A percentage charge for people staking a small amount of coins and a monthly/yearly option for those that are comfortable with it and will have a lot of coins to stake?  I like that idea.
Thank you, exactly.
Trying to acomodate all users, not only the bigger ones.
Nice discussion going on here community, speak up and you get what you want!

IW
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
i like the option of both possibility i must say.

newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
We talking monthly?
We can do it like that but I think yearly is better
My opinion is that the payment should be based on your actual "production" and in the produced currency, this is the only way for end user to know he will get some profits no matter what.
Then provide the option on a monthly fee, in BTC or USD.
Pegging the price to BTC/USD gives the user more troubles calculating what he would end up with in the end.

This is more complex solution, but most fair from what i can see.
You only pay for what you produce/stake independent on BTC/USD fluctations.

IW

I think you havnt been reading the posts on here or the little information on there site, there objective is to drive down the cost we pay to stake down our coins, if they can do it for less energy than we consume, were fundamentally better off regardless of a stakes "proffitability" driving down costs can go along way into driving up profitability.

price wise, i calculated my computer costs me about $65 a year in electric, remaining on almost 24/7 for staking, id prolly be willing to pay half that and switch my computer of for 18hours a day....... gonna be each to there own i guess, how much are there investments worth and can they justify the cost, well if yoru computers on 24/7 i can justify it. Its called a no brainer.
I did read everything here and on their page, and also about their masternode services and exchange.
I think it is you that did not understand what i was writing.

I like how they want to push down the price for the end user, keep going that route.

IW

I think I get what you are saying. Have 2 options.  A percentage charge for people staking a small amount of coins and a monthly/yearly option for those that are comfortable with it and will have a lot of coins to stake?  I like that idea.
hero member
Activity: 736
Merit: 500
Hi guys
Ok then
We know what we would like to charge for this service lol

But

What would you pay?

Don't think it going to be per coin but as a total service with every user having access to every coin
So what's your thoughts ?

$25 $45 $55 per year?
Or your thoughts

I'd prefer to pay a percentage of my stake. Personally I'd have a tiered percentage... the more coins a person stakes the less percentage charged. You'd attract more people that are new to crypto or just new to stake coins even if your entry percentage was a bit high. People with a lot of coins would stick around for the convenience of not having to deal with multiple wallets and the electricity costs.



This is exactly how our team did our pricing, but we are not a pos POOL, but an individual service based on each clients need.

IW
hero member
Activity: 736
Merit: 500
We talking monthly?
We can do it like that but I think yearly is better
My opinion is that the payment should be based on your actual "production" and in the produced currency, this is the only way for end user to know he will get some profits no matter what.
Then provide the option on a monthly fee, in BTC or USD.
Pegging the price to BTC/USD gives the user more troubles calculating what he would end up with in the end.

This is more complex solution, but most fair from what i can see.
You only pay for what you produce/stake independent on BTC/USD fluctations.

IW

I think you havnt been reading the posts on here or the little information on there site, there objective is to drive down the cost we pay to stake down our coins, if they can do it for less energy than we consume, were fundamentally better off regardless of a stakes "proffitability" driving down costs can go along way into driving up profitability.

price wise, i calculated my computer costs me about $65 a year in electric, remaining on almost 24/7 for staking, id prolly be willing to pay half that and switch my computer of for 18hours a day....... gonna be each to there own i guess, how much are there investments worth and can they justify the cost, well if yoru computers on 24/7 i can justify it. Its called a no brainer.
I did read everything here and on their page, and also about their masternode services and exchange.
I think it is you that did not understand what i was writing.

I like how they want to push down the price for the end user, keep going that route.

IW
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Hi guys
Ok then
We know what we would like to charge for this service lol

But

What would you pay?

Don't think it going to be per coin but as a total service with every user having access to every coin
So what's your thoughts ?

$25 $45 $55 per year?
Or your thoughts

I'd prefer to pay a percentage of my stake. Personally I'd have a tiered percentage... the more coins a person stakes the less percentage charged. You'd attract more people that are new to crypto or just new to stake coins even if your entry percentage was a bit high. People with a lot of coins would stick around for the convenience of not having to deal with multiple wallets and the electricity costs.


newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
We talking monthly?
We can do it like that but I think yearly is better
My opinion is that the payment should be based on your actual "production" and in the produced currency, this is the only way for end user to know he will get some profits no matter what.
Then provide the option on a monthly fee, in BTC or USD.
Pegging the price to BTC/USD gives the user more troubles calculating what he would end up with in the end.

This is more complex solution, but most fair from what i can see.
You only pay for what you produce/stake independent on BTC/USD fluctations.

IW

I think you havnt been reading the posts on here or the little information on there site, there objective is to drive down the cost we pay to stake down our coins, if they can do it for less energy than we consume, were fundamentally better off regardless of a stakes "proffitability" driving down costs can go along way into driving up profitability.

price wise, i calculated my computer costs me about $65 a year in electric, remaining on almost 24/7 for staking, id prolly be willing to pay half that and switch my computer of for 18hours a day....... gonna be each to there own i guess, how much are there investments worth and can they justify the cost, well if yoru computers on 24/7 i can justify it. Its called a no brainer.
hero member
Activity: 736
Merit: 500
We talking monthly?
We can do it like that but I think yearly is better
My opinion is that the payment should be based on your actual "production" and in the produced currency, this is the only way for end user to know he will get some profits no matter what.
Then provide the option on a monthly fee, in BTC or USD.
Pegging the price to BTC/USD gives the user more troubles calculating what he would end up with in the end.

This is more complex solution, but most fair from what i can see.
You only pay for what you produce/stake independent on BTC/USD fluctations.

IW
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1003
NodeMasters
We talking monthly?
We can do it like that but I think yearly is better
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
We talking monthly?
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1003
NodeMasters
Hi guys
Ok then
We know what we would like to charge for this service lol

But

What would you pay?

Don't think it going to be per coin but as a total service with every user having access to every coin
So what's your thoughts ?

$25 $45 $55 per year?
Or your thoughts
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Interesting, XQN is watching your service.
We would also like to be represented with you, as we already are on most or all other cloud platforms Smiley
HOW can you afford these prices?
Since we are running a similar, but more individual option your  pricing model is similar to our Enterprise option, i do not understand how you can turn a profit on this.
Do you plan to run with negative income in the startup time, and calculate your fees after a "grace" period?

Anyhow, nice addition to the cloud staking eviroment, staking is a BIG and growing buisiniss.

IW

Join the que we all want to know how if they can really hit that pricing target, but if they can, and it all works i think thats a good thing, finally what you would call a benchmark, because they will just blow the comptition out of the water at 0.10 per coin per year i think he said was the target
hero member
Activity: 736
Merit: 500
Interesting, XQN is watching your service.
We would also like to be represented with you, as we already are on most or all other cloud platforms Smiley
HOW can you afford these prices?
Since we are running a similar, but more individual option your  pricing model is similar to our Enterprise option, i do not understand how you can turn a profit on this.
Do you plan to run with negative income in the startup time, and calculate your fees after a "grace" period?

Anyhow, nice addition to the cloud staking eviroment, staking is a BIG and growing buisiniss.

IW
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1010
good service and good idea Smiley congratulation
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Quick suggestion:  Remove coins with 0 balances from "My Balances" page and provide functionality for users to obtain deposit addresses on the "My Deposits" page.  This would achieve a cleaner "dashboard" of sorts for users and put all deposit information on a single page.  

Really like the service, just let our users know about it in Slack.   Smiley

Looks like you got your wish, i wondered what the error page was about, now i know why haha..


Nice!  UI isn't too important in a site like this since people won't be browsing for long periods, but the easier the better!

Agreed a site like this is fundamentally boring, what do you do, deposit coins and wait... Always nice to have a clean interface over one that offers information overload. Nice to see the changes are applyed so fast aswell
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
Quick suggestion:  Remove coins with 0 balances from "My Balances" page and provide functionality for users to obtain deposit addresses on the "My Deposits" page.  This would achieve a cleaner "dashboard" of sorts for users and put all deposit information on a single page.  

Really like the service, just let our users know about it in Slack.   Smiley

Looks like you got your wish, i wondered what the error page was about, now i know why haha..


Nice!  UI isn't too important in a site like this since people won't be browsing for long periods, but the easier the better!
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Quick suggestion:  Remove coins with 0 balances from "My Balances" page and provide functionality for users to obtain deposit addresses on the "My Deposits" page.  This would achieve a cleaner "dashboard" of sorts for users and put all deposit information on a single page.  

Really like the service, just let our users know about it in Slack.   Smiley

Looks like you got your wish, i wondered what the error page was about, now i know why haha..
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
Quick suggestion:  Remove coins with 0 balances from "My Balances" page and provide functionality for users to obtain deposit addresses on the "My Deposits" page.  This would achieve a cleaner "dashboard" of sorts for users and put all deposit information on a single page.  

Really like the service, just let our users know about it in Slack.   Smiley
Pages:
Jump to: