Topic: [NEW XBY ANN] XTRABYTES - A NEW ERA BEGINS - page 16. (Read 28381 times)

We will see if XBY goes "below 100 sats pretty soon", but in such case I will buy even more. Do not forget the golden rule of trading: do the opposite others do in a market. Especially, buy when you estimate that the value of the asset if much higher that its price.



Pretty bad reputation? I am sorry, this is your interpretation... But, bad reputation by who??
By people who enter in the fora saying without proof that Borzalom does not exist??
By people that use multiple profiles and repeat commenting with a sterile manner that there is no technology at all??
Or by people that -even now- deny that PoSign is in patent pending status??!!!
What would you do if you were a moderator?
I am curious to see what they will "invent" against the XTRABYTES PROJECT when the Canadian Intellectual Property Office lists Posign in their registry...

it'll probably go back to below 100 sats pretty soon. Let me ask you this, do you believe the technology will truly solve the crypto trilemma and has a fully functioning product at this point w/ quantum resistance implemented, can do full 10k TPS with decentralization, code agnosticism implemented and most of the other promises already implemented?

Also don't forget that we're in a bear market, this project still has a pretty bad rep (don't forget like 80% of the people who were originally here were banned from discord and XBY socials including reddit and discord), and there's a serious case of censorship still. If  this is a community coin, moderators do need to be leniant and allow open discussion, even if its "negative" or "critical"

https://snew.notabug.io/r/XtraBYtes/comments/ei36al/xby_token_price_missing/ (example of censorship on XBY socials but the reddit is pretty dead since most of the userbase has been banned)

Censorship drives people away, negative experiences drives people away and STN events often have cascading effects

Some people will soon beg in Discord for cheap "extrabaits".
LOL

Ah so No PP for Posign .. id have though that would be the First PP so basicly you can show us Nothing ..  well at least your not asking us for ID and verrification before.

5 more patents beeing applied for so i have to assume they are not ready for a full roll out of the tech where we can have external party's review it .

Can someone please Post the Patent numbers with Links to the databases they are filed in ? Now that they are pending that should not be an issue.

 

lol.. You think that is trolling? If so, I think you're being a little sensitive. Unless I misunderstood your comment.

lol.. Yeah, I hear you. I don't buy into any type of hype in crypto anymore either. I've been around long enough to know better, as have most of the current crypto community as well. All the more reason XBY will need to provide some form of validation of POSIGN if they want serious investors to begin really buying into it. Investors are much more shrewd these days, speculation and small milestones will only temporarily move the needle in XBY before it goes back to "pre-December" levels like you said. That being said, XBY has been upfront in saying that this is a long term investment/project, and as such, any form of sustained buying of any kind will in all likelihood, only come with either a finished or working product, i.e. Mainnet w/ functioning STATICS, POSIGN etc, or proof of such. Speculatively speaking, if STATICS and  POSIGN are authentic, they probably still have quite a ways to go before coming close to being completed, which the devs. and team are understandably ok with. Unfortunately, for the majority who simply want their investment "in the black" or just want to sell without a loss, the long wait has probably just begun.

To get relisted on CMC, these need to be addressed
_______________________________________________________________________________ ________________

(Section E) Delisting Policy

CoinMarketCap reserves the right to exercise its sole discretion in delisting a market/pair, exchange, or cryptoasset without prior notice. Factors that could contribute to such a course of action may include the following:

    -> Low liquidity or suspicious trading activity. <-
    The project’s cessation of development and/or business activity.
    The project’s listing on CMC was the result of misleading, incomplete, or false information.
    The project (and/or its associates) is under investigation, on regulator watchlists, or is found guilty of a breach of law(s), statute(s), and regulation(s).
   -> Extraordinarily poor implementation or reception by the project’s community. <-
    Any other factor that CoinMarketCap deems risky for its users.

https://support.coinmarketcap.com/hc/en-us/articles/360034124351-Listings-Criteria

Other Issues:

    2. Community Interest & Engagement. A project’s usefulness is largely a function of adoption and its ability to foster meaningful interactions with its community and user base.

 I think all the banning and censorship over the last 2 years will be looked at unfavorably. Same with "certain" members of the community that acted quite problematic on /r cc and other public forums. I do believe that if there was some way to generate interest in the project and do something to gain people's trust again, it could potentially help the project, but banning so many people over the past 2 years who questioned the project is kind of a problem impo

true, but eh i'll go ahead and throw them a bone and be a bit curious as to what they have so far. I honestly doubt it's going to be what its hyped up to be (seriously, ive seen ALOT of projects and they never live up to the hype) but I think what they have so far will be deterministic of where my investment in this project goes. Price wise I do believe its destined to go back to pre-december levels as most events of this nature are but according to borzalom some time last year the zoltchain was pretty much done, so it will be interesting to see what it can and cant do

But we still were promised "code agnostic quantum resistant technology with 10k+ TPS that will solve the crypto trilemma" and it has been 2 years, so im still looking forward to this mystical technology 

If they have been busy behind the scenes as they have said for the past two years, I would think that they begin rolling out many things after the New Year.

Jan 2020 is soon. The revealing of the code agnostic quantum resistant technology with 10k+ TPS that will solve the crypto trilemma that 3000+ other projects has failed to solve is upon us soon. With patents done, there's no more excuses for the revealing of this legendary technology and hopefully we won't be disappointed  

Yes, as much as a sceptic as I tend to be, you do have to give them a little time.

Wrong. I choose the option to reserve judgment until there are verifiable details.

There are no patent application records for Xtrabytes, ‘POSign’, ‘Proof of Signature’, ‘Proof-of-Signature’, Zoltan Szabo, Xtrabytes, Ltd., Dave Bergsma, or any other related and/or associated terms in the following patent and intellectual property databases: WIPO (World Intellectual Property Org), PAIR (Patent Application Information Request), CIPO (Canadian Intellectual Property Org), NIPO (National “ “), EUIPO (European Union “ “), AIPO (American “ “), IP Federation, IPO (Int. Prop. Office), EPO (European Patent Org), Google Patent Search, or Escapenet.

All of these databases are updated as of 12/26/2019 or 12/27/2019 and they all display patent applications as well as granted patents.

A possible explanation for this is the 18-month waiting period for publication of full documents. However, record of the submission should be on the sites. There are applications from just yesterday on them.

I am reserving my judgment until I see some proof. Like I have said from the beginning. All I want is proof.

Aside from this, patent-pending status (and subsequent possibility of patents) does not equate to success. There are millions of patents for things that never achieved any level of success. There‘s also numerous worthless patents.

Here’s a nice article: https://www.forbes.com/sites/toddhixon/2013/10/04/for-most-small-companies-patents-are-just-about-worthless/amp/

Well honestly I have kept my initial XBY investment and I consider it lost, so I'll ride it long term and hope I was wrong the whole time.

Do you know when it will be searchable in the database and by any chance would you happen to have to search number?

And I think the code itself will remain closed source even with patent pending afaik since its proprietary.

Not only they are going to openly publish the submission, but it will be possible for them to reveal the technology.
What does make you think that they are going to hide it?? 

Btw, you should have received a patent number when you submitted for patent pending. Are you going to openly publish it so others can view?

https://www.ic.gc.ca/opic-cipo/cpd/eng/search/number.html (it should be possible to search on this, assuming the patents were filed in Canada)

@Ganja if the tech isn't legendary what will you do?

All depends on what's being patented doesn't it?
Wait and see

Good to know. Merited!

This sounds like a nice achievement.

Just in case you missed it.