Topic: [NEW XBY ANN] XTRABYTES - A NEW ERA BEGINS - page 26. (Read 28391 times)
this project is dying and thats my opinion (it will probably be deleted)
Xtrabytes claims to allow constructive criticism and questions. So why were my 2 posts (quoted below) deleted?
From Grand Thronton website : "Customers did not have individual wallets and it is impossible to determine individual ownership using just the keys in the wallets."
So what is going to happen with that XBY if you manage to get it back ? Who gets it ?
"No detailed reconciliation process between the customer databases and the crypto-assets held in the wallets has ever been completed.
To determine each customer’s holdings we must undertake a manual process to determine what is held in the pooled wallets and then reconcile the information with that held in the customer database. We are hopeful this process will show us the holdings of individual account holders. This process is well underway but will still take some time to complete. "
that just reads like wait untill we are done not like individual negotiations.
Earlier today, Golden and I had a very good conversation with the representative of Grant Thornton, who is in charge of the Cryptopia liquidation procedures. He did express concern that information others have posted online since their group meeting was inaccurate and we have agreed to draft a letter, not only for the XTRABYTES community, but for anyone else affected by the Cryptopia hack. This draft will be sent to this representative for approval and afterwards we will make this information public. In other words, what you are reading elsewhere may (for whatever reasons) not be accurate. Please have patience and faith in the process. Golden and I are happy with what we discussed.
So, they’re entrusting you - one team out of the hundreds of projects on Cryptopia - for what reason? Law firms don’t just make exceptions in these kinds of matters. One exception opens up the doors to 100 exceptions. What reason do they have for entrusting you with this? Is there any proof that this is legitimate?
What we read online may not be accurate... so what makes what you’re saying any more credible than anything else or anyone else? How do we know you are not lying? Again, where is proof that what you’re saying is truthful and agreed upon by both parties - Grant Thornton and Xtrabytes?
CCRevolutionToday at 7:13 AM
Also, amongst this challenging news, I would like to share a small bit of good news with you all. Golden and I are in early stage communication with the person in charge at Grant Thronton. We have received a reply to our request for a personal meeting that detailed some facts about our coins (ie. not affected by the hack according to Cryptopia staff, locked by Zoltan for insurance) and we are happy to report that he is willing to talk with us. We are trying for a date next week and will let you know as soon as we have more news.
Also, amongst this challenging news, I would like to share a small bit of good news with you all. Golden and I are in early stage communication with the person in charge at Grant Thronton. We have received a reply to our request for a personal meeting that detailed some facts about our coins (ie. not affected by the hack according to Cryptopia staff, locked by Zoltan for insurance) and we are happy to report that he is willing to talk with us. We are trying for a date next week and will let you know as soon as we have more news.
From Grand Thronton website : "Customers did not have individual wallets and it is impossible to determine individual ownership using just the keys in the wallets."
So what is going to happen with that XBY if you manage to get it back ? Who gets it ?
"No detailed reconciliation process between the customer databases and the crypto-assets held in the wallets has ever been completed.
To determine each customer’s holdings we must undertake a manual process to determine what is held in the pooled wallets and then reconcile the information with that held in the customer database. We are hopeful this process will show us the holdings of individual account holders. This process is well underway but will still take some time to complete. "
that just reads like wait untill we are done not like individual negotiations.
Earlier today, Golden and I had a very good conversation with the representative of Grant Thornton, who is in charge of the Cryptopia liquidation procedures. He did express concern that information others have posted online since their group meeting was inaccurate and we have agreed to draft a letter, not only for the XTRABYTES community, but for anyone else affected by the Cryptopia hack. This draft will be sent to this representative for approval and afterwards we will make this information public. In other words, what you are reading elsewhere may (for whatever reasons) not be accurate. Please have patience and faith in the process. Golden and I are happy with what we discussed.
So, they’re entrusting you - one team out of the hundreds of projects on Cryptopia - for what reason? Law firms don’t just make exceptions in these kinds of matters. One exception opens up the doors to 100 exceptions. What reason do they have for entrusting you with this? Is there any proof that this is legitimate?
What we read online may not be accurate... so what makes what you’re saying any more credible than anything else or anyone else? How do we know you are not lying? Again, where is proof that what you’re saying is truthful and agreed upon by both parties - Grant Thornton and Xtrabytes?
And the second one:
CCRevolutionToday at 7:13 AM
Also, amongst this challenging news, I would like to share a small bit of good news with you all. Golden and I are in early stage communication with the person in charge at Grant Thronton. We have received a reply to our request for a personal meeting that detailed some facts about our coins (ie. not affected by the hack according to Cryptopia staff, locked by Zoltan for insurance) and we are happy to report that he is willing to talk with us. We are trying for a date next week and will let you know as soon as we have more news.
Also, amongst this challenging news, I would like to share a small bit of good news with you all. Golden and I are in early stage communication with the person in charge at Grant Thronton. We have received a reply to our request for a personal meeting that detailed some facts about our coins (ie. not affected by the hack according to Cryptopia staff, locked by Zoltan for insurance) and we are happy to report that he is willing to talk with us. We are trying for a date next week and will let you know as soon as we have more news.
From Grand Thronton website : "Customers did not have individual wallets and it is impossible to determine individual ownership using just the keys in the wallets."
So what is going to happen with that XBY if you manage to get it back ? Who gets it ?
"No detailed reconciliation process between the customer databases and the crypto-assets held in the wallets has ever been completed.
To determine each customer’s holdings we must undertake a manual process to determine what is held in the pooled wallets and then reconcile the information with that held in the customer database. We are hopeful this process will show us the holdings of individual account holders. This process is well underway but will still take some time to complete. "
that just reads like wait untill we are done not like individual negotiations.
Earlier today, Golden and I had a very good conversation with the representative of Grant Thornton, who is in charge of the Cryptopia liquidation procedures. He did express concern that information others have posted online since their group meeting was inaccurate and we have agreed to draft a letter, not only for the XTRABYTES community, but for anyone else affected by the Cryptopia hack. This draft will be sent to this representative for approval and afterwards we will make this information public. In other words, what you are reading elsewhere may (for whatever reasons) not be accurate. Please have patience and faith in the process. Golden and I are happy with what we discussed.
So, they’re entrusting you - one team out of the hundreds of projects on Cryptopia - for what reason? Law firms don’t just make exceptions in these kinds of matters. One exception opens up the doors to 100 exceptions. What reason do they have for entrusting you with this? Is there any proof that this is legitimate?
What we read online may not be accurate... so what makes what you’re saying any more credible than anything else or anyone else? How do we know you are not lying? Again, where is proof that what you’re saying is truthful and agreed upon by both parties - Grant Thornton and Xtrabytes?
We appreciate that Cryptopia customers want to know where the process is at and what it means for them and understand the concern they feel. While we are working as fast as we can to resolve the situation as we do not have answers to many customer questions at this stage.
Given the volume of correspondence we regularly receive, we cannot reply to individual correspondence. However, we will continue to provide updates via the Cryptopia website, Twitter and Facebook pages.
Exactly why were these posts deleted? I asked questions. I asked for clarification. I asked for proof. I didn’t insult, insinuate, talk down, or make any judgments whatsoever.
Super strange..