Looks like Newdeal guy also scammed Smack that Ace for that white PS3 slim.
Apparently no PS3 was ever shipped.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10436643
Topic: NewDeal2014 SCAMMER (Read 3158 times)
give it a rest, contact the seller, perhaps the seller sent the wrong item , that could be it, why keep trantuming each other here
call him !
give it a rest, contact the seller, perhaps the seller sent the wrong item , that could be it, why keep trantuming each other here
i just hope NewDeal2014 pay my coins..nothing more than that..$400 really worth for me.. 
Hope this is a lesson to you. Next time use a trusted escrow.
i will..thanks mate
i just hope NewDeal2014 pay my coins..nothing more than that..$400 really worth for me..
Hope this is a lesson to you. Next time use a trusted escrow.
i just hope NewDeal2014 pay my coins..nothing more than that..$400 really worth for me..
To me Bits of 8 seems a legit seller based on his feedback www.amazon.com/shops/bitsof8
This seller apparently is even rated as "#1 best seller" in computer servers (although this could be talking about the product not the seller). The seller does have either 4 or 4.5 stars (our of 5) on all the products they are selling. It looks like Newdeal2014 is the only one who receives battery out of more than 50 buyers. If Newdeal2014 is speaking the truth.
Newdeal2014 looks like hes in the wrong id bits of 8 is a legit seller perfect feedback
To me Bits of 8 seems a legit seller based on his feedback www.amazon.com/shops/bitsof8
This seller apparently is even rated as "#1 best seller" in computer servers (although this could be talking about the product not the seller). The seller does have either 4 or 4.5 stars (our of 5) on all the products they are selling. It looks like Newdeal2014 is the only one who receives battery out of more than 50 buyers. If Newdeal2014 is speaking the truth.
To me Bits of 8 seems a legit seller based on his feedback www.amazon.com/shops/bitsof8
This seller apparently is even rated as "#1 best seller" in computer servers (although this could be talking about the product not the seller). The seller does have either 4 or 4.5 stars (our of 5) on all the products they are selling.
the mods can check if he sent the pm to himself or used an alt with the same ip address - pm badbear ASAP to see
if the pm is from a legit user or not
if the pm is from a legit user or not
To me Bits of 8 seems a legit seller based on his feedback www.amazon.com/shops/bitsof8
i already called seller and tell them about wrong item delivered..amazon customer service already know about this..
Is there any conclusion on that? Are there steps being taken?
I am not saying there are no scams on amazon, however I would find it hard to believe that the top search result for a S5 would still be in business if they were in fact scamming even a small percentage of their customers.
You also need to remember that the amazon seller is forced to use escrow via amazon. On the other hand NewDeal2014 refused to use escrow of any kind. Additionally NewDeal2014 is now claiming that the order was funded with stolen funds and/or the seller is participating in money laundering (really just trying to distract from the conversation).
You also need to remember that the amazon seller is forced to use escrow via amazon. On the other hand NewDeal2014 refused to use escrow of any kind. Additionally NewDeal2014 is now claiming that the order was funded with stolen funds and/or the seller is participating in money laundering (really just trying to distract from the conversation).
Agreed. At this moment it is not quite relevant how Poksak paid Bits of 8. Bits of 8 accepted the payment and sent the item to Newdeal2014. So again, Poksak lived up to their end of the deal.
Unless you go all out conspiracy and proof that Poksak is a sock of Bits of 8... Then all bets are off.
Again, without revealing the name of the person who sent me this (I will do so in court if needed):
https://i.imgur.com/8YmjzRB.png
Now I think I'm finally done with this thread. It's late and I have no patience for this kind of nonsense when I haven't slept. I'll be taking screenshots of this entire thread for when/if this goes to court. I will requesting the issuance of a summons for all parties involved in any alleged defamation regarding this incident. Just covering my ass in this matter.
Good luck to all in this thread (except for the OP - I hope you fucking die in a car accident), and I'm sorry for letting my temper flare. I will be using legal means to resolve this instead of arguing back and forth on an internet forum.
I call bluff on this. I personally would not be surprised if you sent this PM to yourself (either via your own account or via an alt of yours). I see no reason why someone would want their identity hidden like this. Nor would revealing this in court do anything to help you https://i.imgur.com/8YmjzRB.png
Now I think I'm finally done with this thread. It's late and I have no patience for this kind of nonsense when I haven't slept. I'll be taking screenshots of this entire thread for when/if this goes to court. I will requesting the issuance of a summons for all parties involved in any alleged defamation regarding this incident. Just covering my ass in this matter.
Good luck to all in this thread (except for the OP - I hope you fucking die in a car accident), and I'm sorry for letting my temper flare. I will be using legal means to resolve this instead of arguing back and forth on an internet forum.
Again, without revealing the name of the person who sent me this (I will do so in court if needed):
https://i.imgur.com/8YmjzRB.png
Now I think I'm finally done with this thread. It's late and I have no patience for this kind of nonsense when I haven't slept. I'll be taking screenshots of this entire thread for when/if this goes to court. I will requesting the issuance of a summons for all parties involved in any alleged defamation regarding this incident. Just covering my ass in this matter.
Good luck to all in this thread (except for the OP - I hope you fucking die in a car accident), and I'm sorry for letting my temper flare. I will be using legal means to resolve this instead of arguing back and forth on an internet forum.
https://i.imgur.com/8YmjzRB.png
Now I think I'm finally done with this thread. It's late and I have no patience for this kind of nonsense when I haven't slept. I'll be taking screenshots of this entire thread for when/if this goes to court. I will requesting the issuance of a summons for all parties involved in any alleged defamation regarding this incident. Just covering my ass in this matter.
Good luck to all in this thread (except for the OP - I hope you fucking die in a car accident), and I'm sorry for letting my temper flare. I will be using legal means to resolve this instead of arguing back and forth on an internet forum.
i already called seller and tell them about wrong item delivered..amazon customer service already know about this..
Is there any conclusion on that? Are there steps being taken?
I am not saying there are no scams on amazon, however I would find it hard to believe that the top search result for a S5 would still be in business if they were in fact scamming even a small percentage of their customers.
You also need to remember that the amazon seller is forced to use escrow via amazon. On the other hand NewDeal2014 refused to use escrow of any kind. Additionally NewDeal2014 is now claiming that the order was funded with stolen funds and/or the seller is participating in money laundering (really just trying to distract from the conversation).
You also need to remember that the amazon seller is forced to use escrow via amazon. On the other hand NewDeal2014 refused to use escrow of any kind. Additionally NewDeal2014 is now claiming that the order was funded with stolen funds and/or the seller is participating in money laundering (really just trying to distract from the conversation).
Agreed. At this moment it is not quite relevant how Poksak paid Bits of 8. Bits of 8 accepted the payment and sent the item to Newdeal2014. So again, Poksak lived up to their end of the deal.
Unless you go all out conspiracy and proof that Poksak is a sock of Bits of 8... Then all bets are off.
seller said they will check on this order, nothing more because they have order details...
i already called seller and tell them about wrong item delivered..amazon customer service already know about this..
Is there any conclusion on that? Are there steps being taken?
I am not saying there are no scams on amazon, however I would find it hard to believe that the top search result for a S5 would still be in business if they were in fact scamming even a small percentage of their customers.
You also need to remember that the amazon seller is forced to use escrow via amazon. On the other hand NewDeal2014 refused to use escrow of any kind. Additionally NewDeal2014 is now claiming that the order was funded with stolen funds and/or the seller is participating in money laundering (really just trying to distract from the conversation).
You also need to remember that the amazon seller is forced to use escrow via amazon. On the other hand NewDeal2014 refused to use escrow of any kind. Additionally NewDeal2014 is now claiming that the order was funded with stolen funds and/or the seller is participating in money laundering (really just trying to distract from the conversation).
Agreed. At this moment it is not quite relevant how Poksak paid Bits of 8. Bits of 8 accepted the payment and sent the item to Newdeal2014. So again, Poksak lived up to their end of the deal.
Unless you go all out conspiracy and proof that Poksak is a sock of Bits of 8... Then all bets are off.
i already called seller and tell them about wrong item delivered..amazon customer service already know about this..
I would still contact the police about this if NewDeal is refusing to pay. Every minute you delay contacting the police is more time that he has to sell the miner for either cash or bitcoin which would make it much more difficult to prove that he received the miner in criminal court. Even if he is convicted of grand larceny you should still be able to recover civil damages from him to recover your losses
I would personally think the chances of it being #2 are greater. I find it somewhat strange that NewDeal2014 received a random PM from someone whose identity he refused to release.
If you add this to the fact that he was refusing to use escrow, I would say it is pretty convincing that he was planning on scamming the entire time.
If you add this to the fact that he was refusing to use escrow, I would say it is pretty convincing that he was planning on scamming the entire time.
For what it's worth the seller seems reputable on amazon. I don't see them sending a battery. So yes, I changed my mind. I'm leaning more towards #2 now as well. Either way the amazon seller may have some interesting details to share with the party that actually got scammed.
You also need to remember that the amazon seller is forced to use escrow via amazon. On the other hand NewDeal2014 refused to use escrow of any kind. Additionally NewDeal2014 is now claiming that the order was funded with stolen funds and/or the seller is participating in money laundering (really just trying to distract from the conversation).
Quote
PS. I do agree that posting personal details may be a bit premature.
The OP posted it in his first post so personal details are not new news. crazykiddo, get out of here. If you can't read the thread you have no place commenting.
Poksak: You could give the seller (Bits of 8 ) a call or shoot of an message asking for their side of the story
Newdeal2014: You could give the seller (Bits of 8 ) a call or shoot of an message asking for their side of the story
Or you could both point fingers at each other and wait for the other to do it.
For what it's worth the seller seems reputable on amazon. I don't see them sending a battery.
PS. I do agree that posting personal details may be a bit premature.
Poksak: You could give the seller (Bits of 8 ) a call or shoot of an message asking for their side of the story
Newdeal2014: You could give the seller (Bits of 8 ) a call or shoot of an message asking for their side of the story
Or you could both point fingers at each other and wait for the other to do it.
For what it's worth the seller seems reputable on amazon. I don't see them sending a battery.
PS. I do agree that posting personal details may be a bit premature.
i already called seller and tell them about wrong item delivered..amazon customer service already know about this..
crazykiddo, get out of here. If you can't read the thread you have no place commenting.
Poksak: You could give the seller (Bits of 8 ) a call or shoot of an message asking for their side of the story
Newdeal2014: You could give the seller (Bits of 8 ) a call or shoot of an message asking for their side of the story
Or you could both point fingers at each other and wait for the other to do it.
For what it's worth the seller seems reputable on amazon. I don't see them sending a battery. So yes, I changed my mind. I'm leaning more towards #2 now as well. Either way the amazon seller may have some interesting details to share with the party that actually got scammed.
PS. I do agree that posting personal details may be a bit premature.
Poksak: You could give the seller (Bits of 8 ) a call or shoot of an message asking for their side of the story
Newdeal2014: You could give the seller (Bits of 8 ) a call or shoot of an message asking for their side of the story
Or you could both point fingers at each other and wait for the other to do it.
I would personally think the chances of it being #2 are greater. I find it somewhat strange that NewDeal2014 received a random PM from someone whose identity he refused to release.
If you add this to the fact that he was refusing to use escrow, I would say it is pretty convincing that he was planning on scamming the entire time.
If you add this to the fact that he was refusing to use escrow, I would say it is pretty convincing that he was planning on scamming the entire time.
For what it's worth the seller seems reputable on amazon. I don't see them sending a battery. So yes, I changed my mind. I'm leaning more towards #2 now as well. Either way the amazon seller may have some interesting details to share with the party that actually got scammed.
PS. I do agree that posting personal details may be a bit premature.
Uninteresting case. Three parties:
1) Poksak
2) Newdeal2014
3) Amazon seller (Bits of
It seems Poksak honored their part of the deal (independently verified by Blazr). It seems Newdeal2014received a battery instead of a miner (unverified)
There are two obvious scenarios:
1) The Amazon seller scammed by sending a battery instead of a miner.
2) Newdeal2014scammed by receiving the miner but claiming they received a battery.
I am leaning towards 1) but there's no evidence to support it. In both cases there is no blame on Poksak because he ordered the exact item that Newdeal2014requested.
Most importantly, neither party seems genuinely interested in resolving the issue. Instead they're acting like little kids having a nice e-tantrum together.
I would personally think the chances of it being #2 are greater. I find it somewhat strange that NewDeal2014 received a random PM from someone whose identity he refused to release. 1) Poksak
2) Newdeal2014
3) Amazon seller (Bits of
It seems Poksak honored their part of the deal (independently verified by Blazr). It seems Newdeal2014received a battery instead of a miner (unverified)
There are two obvious scenarios:
1) The Amazon seller scammed by sending a battery instead of a miner.
2) Newdeal2014scammed by receiving the miner but claiming they received a battery.
I am leaning towards 1) but there's no evidence to support it. In both cases there is no blame on Poksak because he ordered the exact item that Newdeal2014requested.
Most importantly, neither party seems genuinely interested in resolving the issue. Instead they're acting like little kids having a nice e-tantrum together.
If you add this to the fact that he was refusing to use escrow, I would say it is pretty convincing that he was planning on scamming the entire time.
Jump to: