Pages:
Author

Topic: Nexybit Signature Campaign (Sr/Hero signature revised 4/13)(4/10 rates revised) - page 22. (Read 9616 times)

member
Activity: 280
Merit: 12
Loading
Thank you sir, payment I have received ..

Is there no additional bonus sir, because the payment is too low 5000% lower than my payment in signature campaign I ever follow.
hero member
Activity: 493
Merit: 500
Sarthak's a dumb girl
Uh why exactly was Rossy Akbar paid 0.0036 BTC (and twice too from what I see)? His rates come up as 0.0006 instead of 0.00006 on top of that too
jr. member
Activity: 70
Merit: 3
We have sent all the payments for last week's campaign participants except for one person.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QBT5ciPaphI8ktqhCYGs9RL0ZRorHJKEkotQ0EdHXQE/edit#gid=0
You may check your status and rates there. If there has been any mistake, please let us know.

@TianaStam We were unable to send your payment because the number of your posts were so few that your pay was too low to send. We shall add what was not sent to your next payment.

Thank you all for your participation and we hope to continue working with you for a long time.
jr. member
Activity: 70
Merit: 3
The payment that you offer is really little for such kind of rules that you set for participants. My weekly payment is going to be like 2$ per 35 comments! Maybe for poor countries it's money, but for here it's nothing. I hope you will raise payment rates for every rank and Members will take at least 10$ per week.

We are sorry you are not happy with our current rates. We will be discussing a way to increase the rates for participants in a way that benefits all parties concerned. We wish to continue our signature campaign for a lot longer than a few weeks. However, in order to do so, we cannot promise rates that will be hard to keep in the long run but we also want to keep our participants satisfied as well. We will bring this up in our next meeting and hope to come back to you with a solution. Thank you for voicing your opinion.
jr. member
Activity: 70
Merit: 3
It seems to me that you have accepted alot of people, whom only post in bounty campaigns and have a low post quality (without any kind of contribution).
It's not too late too turn around and hire someone who is experienced on this forum to manage this campaign. I've seen many services get their reputation ruined because of horrible campaign managers who accept spammers into their campaigns. DT members are not known to like such behavior.

It's your reputation, and i just wanted to know what you might be facing here.
I don't see any member who seems be outright spammy . And if they were, they didn't have any sig attached to them before(because no campaign accepts spammy users now anyway) hence making the point moot("spam" posts without sig are not considered bad in the community).

AFAIK they guy's managing the camp. seems to be trying to save as much as he can(hence the low sig rates), so why would he waste another 100 bucks or so per week to let an experienced sig manager run it? And as for DT member potentially negging the campaign, I haven't seen anyone except Yobit being negged for "running a spam signature campaign" and that too was because the spam was in way too big a scale.

@nexybit, although I know you're trying to save on the costs "Posts that have less than 100 words will not be counted." is way too strict a requirement for a low paying campaign. 100 chars should be better here.

P.S: Am I the only one seeing that the sig is still kinda off?

Thank you for your advice on the post word count. We agree that it is too strict and have decided to strike that part out.
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 50
Ask me for Pools, Nodes and Explorers.
See my second point, i.e if a person is making "spam" posts and not getting paid for it(seeing as he wasn't accepted in the last sig camp he applied to) , its not counted as (sig)"spam". And well if he keeps posting in bounty, according to the rules he just won't be paid.

I disagree with you. First of all spam is still spam, even if you don't get paid for it. While "spam" is subjective, most of the people recognize difference between useless data/info, or useful data/info. Accepting users to a campaign, even though you do not know your own rules (or try to actually fuck people over) is at least shady. They can just tell the user "Well we will not pay you as your every post is on these kind of threads", so they can just get free advertisement by method. Accepted users might think that they get paid, which encourages them to write more trash.
member
Activity: 218
Merit: 12
The payment that you offer is really little for such kind of rules that you set for participants. My weekly payment is going to be like 2$ per 35 comments! Maybe for poor countries it's money, but for here it's nothing. I hope you will raise payment rates for every rank and Members will take at least 10$ per week.
hero member
Activity: 493
Merit: 500
Sarthak's a dumb girl
Well if this user (whom got accepted) is not spamming and shitposting, i don't know who is: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/reinielle26-1178512

Archive: https://archive.fo/RHmkS

Some responsible manager (like yahoo or aTriz) would never accept such a poster into their campaign, and probably add them to their blacklist. This user is just an example of a poster who has made 0 contribution to the forum, and gets encouraged to spam even more because of getting paid for it.


See my second point, i.e if a person is making "spam" posts and not getting paid for it(seeing as he wasn't accepted in the last sig camp he applied to) , its not counted as (sig)"spam". And well if he keeps posting in bounty, according to the rules he just won't be paid.

As for mentioning merit, its a system meant to keep spammy users from ranking up and is only adopted by some sig campaigns the same way Trust points are adopted.
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 50
Ask me for Pools, Nodes and Explorers.
It seems to me that you have accepted alot of people, whom only post in bounty campaigns and have a low post quality (without any kind of contribution).
It's not too late too turn around and hire someone who is experienced on this forum to manage this campaign. I've seen many services get their reputation ruined because of horrible campaign managers who accept spammers into their campaigns. DT members are not known to like such behavior.

It's your reputation, and i just wanted to know what you might be facing here.
I don't see any member who seems be outright spammy . And if they were, they didn't have any sig attached to them before(because no campaign accepts spammy users now anyway) hence making the point moot("spam" posts without sig are not considered bad in the community).

Well if this user (whom got accepted) is not spamming and shitposting, i don't know who is: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/reinielle26-1178512

Archive: https://archive.fo/RHmkS

Some responsible manager (like yahoo or aTriz) would never accept such a poster into their campaign, and probably add them to their blacklist. This user is just an example of a poster who has made 0 contribution to the forum, and gets encouraged to spam even more because of getting paid for it.



This is the reason why merit system exists nowadays.

Edit: I have nothing against users participating in such things as long as they have shown some kind of contribution.

hero member
Activity: 493
Merit: 500
Sarthak's a dumb girl
It seems to me that you have accepted alot of people, whom only post in bounty campaigns and have a low post quality (without any kind of contribution).
It's not too late too turn around and hire someone who is experienced on this forum to manage this campaign. I've seen many services get their reputation ruined because of horrible campaign managers who accept spammers into their campaigns. DT members are not known to like such behavior.

It's your reputation, and i just wanted to know what you might be facing here.
I don't see any member who seems be outright spammy . And if they were, they didn't have any sig attached to them before(because no campaign accepts spammy users now anyway) hence making the point moot("spam" posts without sig are not considered bad in the community).

AFAIK they guy's managing the camp. seems to be trying to save as much as he can(hence the low sig rates), so why would he waste another 100 bucks or so per week to let an experienced sig manager run it? And as for DT member potentially negging the campaign, I haven't seen anyone except Yobit being negged for "running a spam signature campaign" and that too was because the spam was in way too big a scale.

@nexybit, although I know you're trying to save on the costs "Posts that have less than 100 words will not be counted." is way too strict a requirement for a low paying campaign. 100 chars should be better here.

P.S: Am I the only one seeing that the sig is still kinda off?
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 50
Ask me for Pools, Nodes and Explorers.
We have added a link to our campaign spreadsheet in the OP.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QBT5ciPaphI8ktqhCYGs9RL0ZRorHJKEkotQ0EdHXQE/edit?usp=sharing
Please check and see if your bitcoin address is correct.

Also, those who have not changed their signature but wish to participate, please do till next Monday. You must message us about the change or else your posts cannot be counted.

Thank you.

It seems to me that you have accepted alot of people, whom only post in bounty campaigns and have a low post quality (without any kind of contribution).
It's not too late too turn around and hire someone who is experienced on this forum to manage this campaign. I've seen many services get their reputation ruined because of horrible campaign managers who accept spammers into their campaigns. DT members are not known to like such behavior.

It's your reputation, and i just wanted to know what you might be facing here.
jr. member
Activity: 70
Merit: 3
We have added a link to our campaign spreadsheet in the OP.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QBT5ciPaphI8ktqhCYGs9RL0ZRorHJKEkotQ0EdHXQE/edit?usp=sharing
Please check and see if your bitcoin address is correct.

Also, those who have not changed their signature but wish to participate, please do till next Monday. You must message us about the change or else your posts cannot be counted.

Thank you.
jr. member
Activity: 70
Merit: 3
I already post my name rank and the profile on the thread then how I know that my post will count.??

We are currently creating a spreadsheet which will be updated daily(except for Saturdays and Sundays).
The link will be added as soon as we are through.
There you may check your post count, daily post percentage, and expected payout.
We are sorry it is taking longer than we expected and promised.
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 254
Name: adpinbr
Rank: Sr. Member
Bitcoin Address: 3PJHZA81GJWN8sbdQ96H61SFyfcBoCrK1h
Profile UID: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/adpinbr-104543
sr. member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 261
Name: dupee419
Rank: Sr. Member
Bitcoin Address: 3ABTLdDnMzurw2PwnB3xc2VaA8Akvqcrum
Profile UID: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/dupee419-141742
jr. member
Activity: 70
Merit: 3
Proof of Funds for the next 2 weeks: 0.5 BTC
1Fmr1HXVF4ERvC4tg6b2a2GNHEFXMqKt7H
Why don't you just post a signed message with the address you mentioned to proved that you own the address not just posting any random address that contains a 0.5 btc on it. Or you should contact an escrow for the reasons like what posted above.
Looks like OP is not listening. I think he's not really interested in hiring escrow for this Campaign. Well, if this continues, this Campaign will be Very Suspicious .
Members who are attempting to participate. Please be cautious.
There is a possibility that this Campaign is a Scam.
I'm sorry OP but people will only trust your Campaign if you hire an Escrow for the funds. Please be aware of that.

- Payment for your campaign is too low, Legendary/Hero Members: 0.00006 BTC per post and Maximum 35 constructive posts per week so they can earn 0.0021 BTC per week. It's too low, i see that Legendary/Hero Members can earn at least 0.01 or above per week in most of other signature campaign.
I don't understand why some member still have joined your campaign. Smiley
Actually, the payment's price doesn't matter. It's up to those Members if they will agree to the designated Amount of payment. What I concerned most is, if the participants will be paid after the Campaign. Because this seems suspicious.


We are sorry if this campaign seems suspicious. However, we do not feel a need to hire an escrow as we plan to earn your trust by being competent in our work. We wish to work and keep a good relationship with this community. We do thank you for your concern.
jr. member
Activity: 70
Merit: 3
Based on your guideline , user with red-ve like me able to join the campaign or you forget to add one ?


Proof of Funds for the next 2 weeks: 0.5 BTC
1Fmr1HXVF4ERvC4tg6b2a2GNHEFXMqKt7H
Why don't you just post a signed message with the address you mentioned to proved that you own the address not just posting any random address that contains a 0.5 btc on it. Or you should contact an escrow for the reasons like what posted above.

Yes, this is Important ! In order to get poster's interest to join your campaign.

We are comfortable with those with red accounts joining our campaign as long as what you post has merit. However, if we find what you post while in this campaign has a negative advertising effect towards our company, we will unfortunately must delete you from our list.
member
Activity: 224
Merit: 61
Name:cho99
Rank:Member
Bitcoin Address: 14DpgbnAiLv2wQ7KDbfr2k2ixGpFBtz923
Profile UID: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile

cancelling my application , rate are too low and no escrow for the funds
so many things to review
member
Activity: 126
Merit: 50
Ask me for Pools, Nodes and Explorers.
While the rates posted by the campaign manager is ridiculous, I think its an open market where they are doing what they can afford. If they promised higher rate and fail to pay, you will be one of the people that would have suggested that "they should go for lower rate that they can afford". If anyone is comfortable with the rate, let him apply what should be the focus would be quality posts and there is no excuse to fall short of that because they knew what they were getting into. And finally there is no need to start name calling about shit posters you might be surprised when those who apply indicated their country of origin.

My point was that a quality poster with some amount of self respect, would not apply to this campaign because 2$ is not even a minimum wage for an hour of work in EU countries. For example, paying decent rate to few quality posters instead of having a shitload of spammers would be better.



I do not quite get your point about "namecalling" as i was not attacking any particular user, so are you implicating that people from 3rd world are not more likely spammers as this forum might be their only source of income.
hero member
Activity: 1330
Merit: 569
These rates are a joke. In best case scenario, you will only attract 3rd world shitposters/spammers and cause a wave of using the word "sir" on this forum.



I suggest you to offer decent rates, because the curreny ones are just wayyyy too low because most campaigns pay over 35x more than you do. Also get a campaign manager, because they know what to do about shitposters.

While the rates posted by the campaign manager is ridiculous, I think its an open market where they are doing what they can afford. If they promised higher rate and fail to pay, you will be one of the people that would have suggested that "they should go for lower rate that they can afford". If anyone is comfortable with the rate, let him apply what should be the focus would be quality posts and there is no excuse to fall short of that because they knew what they were getting into. And finally there is no need to start name calling about shit posters you might be surprised when those who apply indicated their country of origin.
Pages:
Jump to: