... EWBF did have a faster miner then Nicehash for like a week ...
All this is seen by the thread's posts.
But let me recap this for you:
- First it was just EQM
- EWBF comes into play
- EWBF making faster miner but with more power consumption
- In that time EWBF was making ~250 and EQM ~220 on GTX 1070
- EQM release with ~320 speed came out with much lower power consumption
- Few days later, EWBF "magically" drops in power consumption and almost equals the speed
So why is this important information:
if you use one algorithm, you can't just drop in power consumption like that - software needs to be rewritten for that - it means changing algorithm altogether.
And from this point on, we always release faster and better version and after us, he also releases the version with the same or little slower speed.
This is all from public posts, further proofs will be available on source release.
OK, OK. Imagine that he stole your miner (source, or disassembled kernels, or integrated binary kernels to his code).
How can you explain this .
"- EWBF making faster miner but with more power consumption
- In that time EWBF was making ~250 and EQM ~220 on GTX 1070"
and this.
"But how you explain, that his linux version faster, than yours ? You said that you have issues with linux version of 1.0.4, but his 0.0.8b works flawless."
Or EWBF == DjeZo ?