Pages:
Author

Topic: NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c - page 14. (Read 238047 times)

legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1014
Most pool take at least 1% fee, so added to ewbf 2%, nicehash is more or less equal in that regards Smiley some also could argue that if your aim is to mine an altcoin to transform it in BTC, they give you btc directly, so you also save on the transform fee. Anyway Smiley
I don't think you save anything with Nicehash, their exchange rate is lower than the current rates at poloniex/bittrex. At least that's what other users reported in EWBF thread and that's what WhatToMine says. In my opinion EQM miner should be at least 10-15% faster than EWBF to justify using it. Right now it's ~ 5-7% faster for me, so I switched to EWBF. Let's see whether Nicehash releases an update. Smiley
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
ewbf just released v0.007 its nice to see we still have a healthy competition Smiley

Over to you NH.. I expect at least 7%-10% faster than ewbf, To justify your 3% fee.

Most pool take at least 1% fee, so added to ewbf 2%, nicehash is more or less equal in that regards Smiley some also could argue that if your aim is to mine an altcoin to transform it in BTC, they give you btc directly, so you also save on the transform fee. Anyway Smiley

Cheers and happy mining all !
hero member
Activity: 525
Merit: 500
ewbf just released v0.007 its nice to see we still have a healthy competition Smiley

Over to you NH.. I expect at least 7%-10% faster than ewbf, To justify your 3% fee.
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
460 on GTX 1080 +750 mem core

great work dev!

would still love to see someone crack the GDDRX5 limitations, as there's more power to unlock for all the gamers in the world with GTX 1080 cards.

i get 505 SOL on my 1080

2060MHZ core, + 650 memory
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030

Agreed, rentability is better @700w, but it depends if you pay for electricity and if it's cheap or not, sadly for me it's expensive, so just like you i mine @50% tdp ^^

yeah if i had 5 cent electricity i would go with 2500+ sol 1000watt, as it will earn you more in the long term but it's not the case for me either

 There is one reason why I moved last summer to The Land Of Very Very Cheap Electric.

legendary
Activity: 1901
Merit: 1024
ewbf just released v0.007 its nice to see we still have a healthy competition Smiley
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
460 on GTX 1080 +750 mem core

great work dev!

would still love to see someone crack the GDDRX5 limitations, as there's more power to unlock for all the gamers in the world with GTX 1080 cards.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
Come on nicehash people, give us Linux folks some love.

I only get 299sol/s on gtx 1070 asus strix (no overclock no nothing, brand new) with 3b version.
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
Hello,

I am mining on Ubuntu16.04 using GTX 1080.EQM version is 1.0.3b.
GTX1080 is overclocking.But my Sol is about 295.
Is Ubuntu's rate lower than Windows?

They haven't yet released the 1.0.4a update for linux so yes it is for now
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
Does anybody achieve 430 sol in 6x-rig per gtx 1070 (sum=2580)?

it's possible with very high memory oc, and core above 100, tdp and wattage also will be higher, but it also depend on the model of your gpu

i'm at 2500 with 1000 watt at the wall, much better to do 2220 at 700 watt for me

Agreed, rentability is better @700w, but it depends if you pay for electricity and if it's cheap or not, sadly for me it's expensive, so just like you i mine @50% tdp ^^

yeah if i had 5 cent electricity i would go with 2500+ sol 1000watt, as it will earn you more in the long term but it's not the case for me either
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
Hello,

I am mining on Ubuntu16.04 using GTX 1080.EQM version is 1.0.3b.
GTX1080 is overclocking.But my Sol is about 295.
Is Ubuntu's rate lower than Windows?
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CryptoLearner
Does anybody achieve 430 sol in 6x-rig per gtx 1070 (sum=2580)?

it's possible with very high memory oc, and core above 100, tdp and wattage also will be higher, but it also depend on the model of your gpu

i'm at 2500 with 1000 watt at the wall, much better to do 2220 at 700 watt for me

Agreed, rentability is better @700w, but it depends if you pay for electricity and if it's cheap or not, sadly for me it's expensive, so just like you i mine @50% tdp ^^
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1046
When the Linux version for the 1.04 ?
newbie
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
Does anybody achieve 430 sol in 6x-rig per gtx 1070 (sum=2580)?

it's possible with very high memory oc, and core above 100, tdp and wattage also will be higher, but it also depend on the model of your gpu

i'm at 2500 with 1000 watt at the wall, much better to do 2220 at 700 watt for me


I have a 4 rig setup with 1070s that is pushing 1706 SOL/sec, so an increase of 2 more would easily get a few SOL shy of 2580. I know i can push the OC a bit more on each card
legendary
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
Does anybody achieve 430 sol in 6x-rig per gtx 1070 (sum=2580)?

it's possible with very high memory oc, and core above 100, tdp and wattage also will be higher, but it also depend on the model of your gpu

i'm at 2500 with 1000 watt at the wall, much better to do 2220 at 700 watt for me
sr. member
Activity: 954
Merit: 250
Does anybody achieve 430 sol in 6x-rig per gtx 1070 (sum=2580)?
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
1070 with my cpu i5 2500K - 450 sol/s
Good Work!
hero member
Activity: 677
Merit: 500
1080 oc 1936 core, mem 11016 491 h/s
newbie
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
Hi! And about GTX TITAN X Maxwell hashrate? Anyone tried it?

Thanks
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1024
Did anyone try 1050 and 1050 Ti with the latest version? What's the hashrate at stock?

it should be at least 1/3 of the 1070 so 140 sol with 35watt, it was 120 before if i'm correct

Yup, check power numbers. New version uses 10% more... but still more efficient then the last version.

it give me the same power as before but hashrate is 12% higher at least, same settings as before

You're limiting by TDP, of course it's going to be the same power usage. That's also why you're not getting 20% higher hash.
Pages:
Jump to: