Forgot to mention, there is hidden secret:
Use two instances per GPU device: -cd 0 0
Or to launch two instances for every GPU device: -ca -ca
Topic: NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c - page 26. (Read 238050 times)
December 12, 2016, 12:50:28 PM
December 12, 2016, 12:49:07 PM
getting 300 sol at the same wattage as before, now that is an improvement, as usual 55% tdp 120 core 400 mem, still only slightly better than the free pool miner
December 12, 2016, 12:48:11 PM
Here is link for Win version, Linux is coming very shortly (matter of minutes, hour or two).
https://www.nicehash.com/tools/eqm_v1.0.3a_Win64.zip
Now, lets see who can pull 400 Sol out of his card
Only 370 sols ((( https://www.nicehash.com/tools/eqm_v1.0.3a_Win64.zip
Now, lets see who can pull 400 Sol out of his card
palit sjs gtx 1070 (samsung)
what kind of OC settings? any special options when running the miner?
I'm only getting ~280 sols
December 12, 2016, 12:45:52 PM
Here is link for Win version, Linux is coming very shortly (matter of minutes, hour or two).
https://www.nicehash.com/tools/eqm_v1.0.3a_Win64.zip
Now, lets see who can pull 400 Sol out of his card
Only 370 sols ((( https://www.nicehash.com/tools/eqm_v1.0.3a_Win64.zip
Now, lets see who can pull 400 Sol out of his card
palit sjs gtx 1070 (samsung)
December 12, 2016, 12:42:22 PM
[18:40:17][0x000009f4][debug] miner#0: 190 I/s, 350 Sols/s -> GTX1080
[18:40:17][0x000009f4][debug] miner#1: 180 I/s, 330 Sols/s -> GTX1070
[18:40:17][0x000009f4][debug] miner#2: 180 I/s, 330 Sols/s -> GTX1070
[18:40:17][0x000009f4][debug] miner#3: 180 I/s, 330 Sols/s -> GTX1070
[18:40:17][0x000009f4][debug] miner#4: 180 I/s, 330 Sols/s -> GTX1080
[18:40:17][0x000009f4][debug] miner#1: 180 I/s, 330 Sols/s -> GTX1070
[18:40:17][0x000009f4][debug] miner#2: 180 I/s, 330 Sols/s -> GTX1070
[18:40:17][0x000009f4][debug] miner#3: 180 I/s, 330 Sols/s -> GTX1070
[18:40:17][0x000009f4][debug] miner#4: 180 I/s, 330 Sols/s -> GTX1080
December 12, 2016, 12:40:38 PM
I'm getting 340 sol from EVGA 1070 SC (2012/4250 micron). Judging by the temps/fan speed, power consumption is lower with this miner than with EWBF miner (had about 280-290 sol with that one).
December 12, 2016, 12:38:08 PM
temp and power use i a lot less then ewbf miner...
speed some ~350-360 OC
pls make it use 100% GPU and we will have 10% more if possible
speed some ~350-360 OC
pls make it use 100% GPU and we will have 10% more if possible
December 12, 2016, 12:35:18 PM
GTX 1080 EVGA SC
TPD: 110 (+10)
+ 75 core
+ 450 MEM
317 Sol/s, the same speed with EWBF's miner.
Let's see with 1070
TPD: 110 (+10)
+ 75 core
+ 450 MEM
317 Sol/s, the same speed with EWBF's miner.
Let's see with 1070
December 12, 2016, 12:24:13 PM
Here is link for Win version, Linux is coming very shortly (matter of minutes, hour or two).
https://www.nicehash.com/tools/eqm_v1.0.3a_Win64.zip
Now, lets see who can pull 400 Sol out of his card
https://www.nicehash.com/tools/eqm_v1.0.3a_Win64.zip
Now, lets see who can pull 400 Sol out of his card
December 12, 2016, 12:15:56 PM
I also tested GTX 980 Ti, it did 350 overclocked, but that was with a bit older code, that wasn't properly tuned for that card.
We will try some more tricks tomorrow and hopefully push stock 1070 to 320 Sol/s. Also need to find proper setups for older cards such as 970 and 750 Ti.
I've 960s and 950s to test on.
My 750 Ti are both in XP-based 32-bit systems though.
December 12, 2016, 12:03:47 PM
Sure I know, but we need WAR in development, we almost never see that for nvidia, just look at sp_ he did not code anything big in a year or so 
December 12, 2016, 12:02:02 PM
Release today pls .
300 sol at 140w with nicehash pool locked, is the same as pool free with 260sol/100w, so it's pointless to wait for it, just see whattomine, it's pretty accurate for zcash at least
you are wrong, you can always undervolt a card a bit with OC and TDP limit... and I am sure consumption will not be worst then ewbf for 100% because ewbf atm use ~90+ % of TDP of referent card at default
anyway from OC I am expecting at least 360-370sol/s from 1070!
you are forgetting that even at the same efficiency you lose something because you are dumping on nicehahs directly, unless they can pull off the same wattage at 300 sol, it's not worth the switch
December 12, 2016, 11:59:59 AM
I also tested GTX 980 Ti, it did 350 overclocked, but that was with a bit older code, that wasn't properly tuned for that card.
We will try some more tricks tomorrow and hopefully push stock 1070 to 320 Sol/s. Also need to find proper setups for older cards such as 970 and 750 Ti.
I've 960s and 950s to test on.
My 750 Ti are both in XP-based 32-bit systems though.
December 12, 2016, 11:56:58 AM
Release today pls .
300 sol at 140w with nicehash pool locked, is the same as pool free with 260sol/100w, so it's pointless to wait for it, just see whattomine, it's pretty accurate for zcash at least
you are wrong, you can always undervolt a card a bit with OC and TDP limit... and I am sure consumption will not be worst then ewbf for 100% because ewbf atm use ~90+ % of TDP of referent card at default
anyway from OC I am expecting at least 360-370sol/s from 1070!
December 12, 2016, 11:54:30 AM
Release today pls .
300 sol at 140w with nicehash pool locked, is the same as pool free with 260sol/100w, so it's pointless to wait for it, just see whattomine, it's pretty accurate for zcash at least
December 12, 2016, 11:45:13 AM
But please watch your watt meter at the wall. The few extra sols cost more the electricity..about 4x more.
I have one on a rig next to me and went through the wattage to hash to cost to profit. It's better to power down tdp and oc memory and core. You loose hashrate but gain profit to cost of electricity. Thx
4x more? I have one on a rig next to me and went through the wattage to hash to cost to profit. It's better to power down tdp and oc memory and core. You loose hashrate but gain profit to cost of electricity. Thx
How is adding 1-5% more in power consumption (with like 20%+ increase in hashrate at the same time) suddenly costs you 4 times more in electricity bills? December 12, 2016, 11:30:21 AM
Linux, always making things slower.
HAha
HAha
that's because they do windows first, as it's the most difficult to do ;-)
jokes aside, thanks god we've got (OS) choice.
Sure pallas, you are right!
December 12, 2016, 10:42:38 AM
I also tested GTX 980 Ti, it did 350 overclocked, but that was with a bit older code, that wasn't properly tuned for that card.
We will try some more tricks tomorrow and hopefully push stock 1070 to 320 Sol/s. Also need to find proper setups for older cards such as 970 and 750 Ti.
I've 960s and 950s to test on.
My 750 Ti are both in XP-based 32-bit systems though.
December 12, 2016, 10:38:02 AM
But please watch your watt meter at the wall. The few extra sols cost more the electricity..about 4x more.
I have one on a rig next to me and went through the wattage to hash to cost to profit. It's better to power down tdp and oc memory and core. You loose hashrate but gain profit to cost of electricity. Thx
4x more? I have one on a rig next to me and went through the wattage to hash to cost to profit. It's better to power down tdp and oc memory and core. You loose hashrate but gain profit to cost of electricity. Thx
How is adding 1-5% more in power consumption (with like 20%+ increase in hashrate at the same time) suddenly costs you 4 times more in electricity bills? 
December 12, 2016, 10:31:32 AM
Linux, always making things slower.
HAha
HAha
that's because they do windows first, as it's the most difficult to do ;-)
jokes aside, thanks god we've got (OS) choice.
Jump to: