I'm mixing:
rig 2x970 + 2x1070 = 660-670 Sol
rig 4x970 = 635-661 Sol
rig 1x960 + 1x980 = 213-234 Sol
solo 960 = 59-61 Sol
solo 970 = 143-144 Sol
solo 980 = 159-166 Sol
solo 1070 = 188-189 Sol
all running under eqm_v1.0.2b_Win64
P.S. i'm not 100% sure, but looks eqm_v1.0.2a SolRate was better, even eqm_v1.0.2a falls at a poor connections
You should be getting higher speed for 960 (probably around 90). That is way too low. eqm 1.0.2a used mode 2 for all cards. You can experiment with modes and see if that brings you higher speed.
GTX 750ti AND GTX 960 PERFORM AT ABOUT THE SAME HASH RATE--
The GTX 750ti cards have 5 CUDA cores, the GTX 960 cards have 8 CUDA cores. I have noticed that the GTX 960 does not perform much faster than the GTX 750ti on EquiHash. Certainly not at a ratio of 8 to 5 (8/5x faster).
I am mining with EQM v1.0.2b. --scryptr
THE 750ti HAS 640 CUDA CORES--
YOU ARE RIGHT. I was thinking of Thread Blocks (TB), and my post was incorrect. The 750ti has 5 TB vs 8 TB for the GTX 960. Here is a comparison chart:
GTX 750ti vs GTX 960 (taken from "www.hwcompare.com").
I somehow confused CUDA cores with TB, because TB are used to set up the launch parameters for mining CryptoNight. CryptoNight is another slow-hashing algorithm, and I have noticed that the GTX 960 is similar in performance to the GTX 750ti with CryptoNight algorithm, also. The GTX 960 should be significantly better performer based on hardware comparison.
Apologies for the error! --scryptr