NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c - page 36.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: kopija on December 01, 2016, 06:20:01 AM

Quote from: ZenFr on December 01, 2016, 04:38:22 AM

Yes, there is no doubt, something is wrong.

Try my coomand :

Quote

./eqm_ubuntu_16 -l eu -t 0 -u 16HGUJUGh7TF9QiGm759h4phwAJXMjaDZT -w 1070b -cd 0

Does it works ? And how many Sol/s ?

You probably should have arround 125 sol/s...

Solved. Thanks.
I installed eqm from github, that was the problem.
Downloaded zip from the first page, no need to compile.
140 sols/s on 1060 3G.
Nice work by djeZo, shows that CUDA still has potential.

what is your wattage? can you push them to 150 at least?

ZenFr

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1046

Quote from: kopija on December 01, 2016, 06:20:01 AM

Quote from: ZenFr on December 01, 2016, 04:38:22 AM

Yes, there is no doubt, something is wrong.

Try my coomand :

Quote

./eqm_ubuntu_16 -l eu -t 0 -u 16HGUJUGh7TF9QiGm759h4phwAJXMjaDZT -w 1070b -cd 0

Does it works ? And how many Sol/s ?

You probably should have arround 125 sol/s...

Solved. Thanks.
I installed eqm from github, that was the problem.
Downloaded zip from the first page, no need to compile.
140 sols/s on 1060 3G.
Nice work by djeZo, shows that CUDA still has potential.

Ok, happy to read that :-).

Yes, I think too that Cuda has a great potential with ZCash.

kopija

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: ZenFr on December 01, 2016, 04:38:22 AM

Yes, there is no doubt, something is wrong.

Try my coomand :

Quote

./eqm_ubuntu_16 -l eu -t 0 -u 16HGUJUGh7TF9QiGm759h4phwAJXMjaDZT -w 1070b -cd 0

Does it works ? And how many Sol/s ?

You probably should have arround 125 sol/s...

Solved. Thanks.
I installed eqm from github, that was the problem.
Downloaded zip from the first page, no need to compile.
140 sols/s on 1060 3G.
Nice work by djeZo, shows that CUDA still has potential.

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: _javi_ on December 01, 2016, 05:47:31 AM

i see speeds above 200sols for a single 1070 rig. Even 2x card rigs have such speeds..

I´m only getting 680 at most with a 4x rig. (Gigab G1)

Win7, 372.54 driver. (-502, +0 , 80% seem to get the better results)

I´m upgrading driver to latest to test. Currently using 1.0.2b miner, what am i missing???

win 7? with your same setting under msi i have 180 sol per card, with 100 core 400 mem 206 sol per card

driver are the one before the new one tht were released recently

Styx36

newbie

Activity: 3

Merit: 0

Quote from: Amph on December 01, 2016, 02:36:35 AM

Quote from: kopija on December 01, 2016, 02:00:42 AM

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 12:00:34 PM

Quote from: Amph on November 29, 2016, 06:37:07 AM

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 05:19:21 AM

1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda Cool

with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

Greetings ZenFr,
I am seeing only 20 sol/s on 1060 on Linux, while my 970 is pulling 130 sol/s on Windows machine.
Running Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda 8, driver 370.28, nvidia-smi confirms 100% GPU usage
./nheqminer_cuda_tromp -l equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357 -u deleted.worker1 -cd 0 -t 0
Why is my Linux hashrate so low?
Is it due to limitations of Linux version of EQM?

so for the 1060 the hash is incorrect? it should be 150 sol, if we account 33% less speed in comparison with the 1070

Hi Guys !
I have maybe 165-170 sol/s with my gtx 1060 6gb strix.

_javi_

hero member

Activity: 968

Merit: 624

Still a manic miner

i see speeds above 200sols for a single 1070 rig. Even 2x card rigs have such speeds..

I´m only getting 680 at most with a 4x rig. (Gigab G1)

Win7, 372.54 driver. (-502, +0 , 80% seem to get the better results)

I´m upgrading driver to latest to test. Currently using 1.0.2b miner, what am i missing???

ZenFr

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1046

Yes, there is no doubt, something is wrong.

Try my coomand :

Quote

./eqm_ubuntu_16 -l eu -t 0 -u 16HGUJUGh7TF9QiGm759h4phwAJXMjaDZT -w 1070b -cd 0

Does it works ? And how many Sol/s ?

You probably should have arround 125 sol/s...

kopija

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: Amph on December 01, 2016, 02:36:35 AM

Quote from: kopija on December 01, 2016, 02:00:42 AM

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 12:00:34 PM

Quote from: Amph on November 29, 2016, 06:37:07 AM

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 05:19:21 AM

1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda Cool

with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

Greetings ZenFr,
I am seeing only 20 sol/s on 1060 on Linux, while my 970 is pulling 130 sol/s on Windows machine.
Running Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda 8, driver 370.28, nvidia-smi confirms 100% GPU usage
./nheqminer_cuda_tromp -l equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357 -u deleted.worker1 -cd 0 -t 0
Why is my Linux hashrate so low?
Is it due to limitations of Linux version of EQM?

so for the 1060 the hash is incorrect? it should be 150 sol, if we account 33% less speed in comparison with the 1070

The hash for 1060 in my case is low in Linux.
Maybe I am doing something wrong?

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: kopija on December 01, 2016, 02:00:42 AM

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 12:00:34 PM

Quote from: Amph on November 29, 2016, 06:37:07 AM

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 05:19:21 AM

1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda Cool

with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

Greetings ZenFr,
I am seeing only 20 sol/s on 1060 on Linux, while my 970 is pulling 130 sol/s on Windows machine.
Running Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda 8, driver 370.28, nvidia-smi confirms 100% GPU usage
./nheqminer_cuda_tromp -l equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357 -u deleted.worker1 -cd 0 -t 0
Why is my Linux hashrate so low?
Is it due to limitations of Linux version of EQM?

so for the 1060 the hash is incorrect? it should be 150 sol, if we account 33% less speed in comparison with the 1070

kopija

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 250

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 12:00:34 PM

Quote from: Amph on November 29, 2016, 06:37:07 AM

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 05:19:21 AM

1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda Cool

with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

Greetings ZenFr,
I am seeing only 20 sol/s on 1060 on Linux, while my 970 is pulling 130 sol/s on Windows machine.
Running Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda 8, driver 370.28, nvidia-smi confirms 100% GPU usage
./nheqminer_cuda_tromp -l equihash.eu.nicehash.com:3357 -u deleted.worker1 -cd 0 -t 0
Why is my Linux hashrate so low?
Is it due to limitations of Linux version of EQM?

ol92

sr. member

Activity: 445

Merit: 255

Quote from: martanFTM on November 29, 2016, 06:59:53 PM

Hey, lets brag a bit

Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner

and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight

i7 6900K@4,2, ddr@2800, win 10 : around 50h/s (a little bit more if no other programs running), 600h-630/s @cryptonight if no others programs running, else 580 with gpu mining.

return to nvidia zcah : GTX1080 : around 185-190 @100W with mem +1000, tdp @50% (msi gaming x)

martanFTM

newbie

Activity: 17

Merit: 0

Quote from: ZenFr on November 30, 2016, 04:20:35 AM

Quote from: Kompik on November 30, 2016, 04:00:43 AM

Quote from: martanFTM on November 29, 2016, 06:59:53 PM

Hey, lets brag a bit

Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner

and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight

How dangerous is it to overclock the memory so high?

Not really dangerous and not at all if TdP is downclocking.
That is dangerous, is to increase the TdP/power usage/consumption.

This remain to be seen in longer term. But still, card is running in P2 mode (second fastest), if it switches to P0, which is driver prohibited for mining(cuda compute), it goes beyond 5000Mhz with no visible artifacts. Guessing from that, it still should have some room.

ZenFr

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1046

Quote from: Kompik on November 30, 2016, 04:00:43 AM

Quote from: martanFTM on November 29, 2016, 06:59:53 PM

Hey, lets brag a bit

Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner

and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight

How dangerous is it to overclock the memory so high?

Not really dangerous and not at all if TdP is downclocking.
That is dangerous, is to increase the TdP/power usage/consumption.

ZenFr

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1046

Quote from: Amph on November 30, 2016, 01:57:30 AM

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 12:00:34 PM

Quote from: Amph on November 29, 2016, 06:37:07 AM

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 05:19:21 AM

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

i'm at 202 sol with 95 watt per card

Wich cards is it and how do you setup them ?

Personnaly :
1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda Cool

with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

g1 gaming, i suspect palit is better, i just tested now 100 core and 400 mem doing 206 and always 95w per card

1809/3999 core and mem, using win 10, 375.95 drivers

someone has the speed of a 1060 3gb? i'm interested in the hash/watt ratio

Thank you :-).

Kompik

sr. member

Activity: 463

Merit: 250

Quote from: martanFTM on November 29, 2016, 06:59:53 PM

Hey, lets brag a bit

Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner

and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight

How dangerous is it to overclock the memory so high?

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 12:00:34 PM

Quote from: Amph on November 29, 2016, 06:37:07 AM

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 05:19:21 AM

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

i'm at 202 sol with 95 watt per card

Wich cards is it and how do you setup them ?

Personnaly :
1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda Cool

with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

g1 gaming, i suspect palit is better, i just tested now 100 core and 400 mem doing 206 and always 95w per card

1809/3999 core and mem, using win 10, 375.95 drivers

someone has the speed of a 1060 3gb? i'm interested in the hash/watt ratio

martanFTM

newbie

Activity: 17

Merit: 0

Hey, lets brag a bit

Just for fun - maybe setting new benchmark?

heavy overclocked GTX 1070 MSI Gaming X - 2202 / 4800 Mhz = 255 sol/s max
Powerlimit @72
This one is really nice piece of silicon - 24/7 stable, other 4x 1070 are capped around 235/sol/s

windows 10 (1607) + latest 375.95 driver + MSI Afterburner

and even more fun 10/20cores i7-6950X @ 4200Mhz + quad channel 3200Mhz RAM
= 70sol/s or 520.000H/s cryptonight

ZenFr

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1046

Quote from: Amph on November 29, 2016, 06:37:07 AM

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 05:19:21 AM

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

i'm at 202 sol with 95 watt per card

Wich cards is it and how do you setup them ?

Personnaly :
1 x KFA2 EX + 1 x KFA2 EXOC
GTX 1070 EX : Frequencies = 4004 and 1923 MHz & TdP = 100 W
GTX 1070 EXOC : Frequencies = 4004 and 2012 MHz & TdP = 100 W
Setup made in the driver (Ubuntu 16.04/Cuda Cool

with the "nidia-smi" command.
My hashrate is a little less than 200 sol/s, for both cards (not realy differences between them).

Amph

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 1070

Quote from: ZenFr on November 29, 2016, 05:19:21 AM

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

i'm at 202 sol with 95 watt per card, but 240 is unreachable for me dunno how that guy did it, unless he rised the tdp too high but it's not worth it, too much consumption for little gain

ZenFr

legendary

Activity: 1260

Merit: 1046

Ok, guys, 2 x 1070 :-).

@loginx :
Hashrate for GTX 1070 is ~ 200/220 sol/s @ base frequencies @~125 W and ~170/175 sol/s @boost frequencies @ <100 W.

Topic: NiceHash EQM Zcash NVIDIA optimized miner [Maxwell/Pascal] + CPU mining v1.0.4c - page 36. (Read 238050 times)