Topic: Nights Watch by Afrikoin - page 56. (Read 303329 times)

ANother thing

ATH+1 would still not have invalidated a wave B correction

because of this

This was another chart too.

The AB in purple is the shallow correction to $1142

While i might have had a B top as my most favorobale count, i was open to more further upside

I also recall someone posting this chart and asking my opinion

I added 2 options - one down and one up

Down would have confirmed a wave B corrective top.

The option up was for a count that invalidated the wave B count.

If you seel below, i altered this chart to explain what would happen in the event on invalidation of wave B and further upside.

Before you slay me again

The red forecast i added was exactly what happened. The A - B was the shallow retracement to $1142 that continued up in the 1-2-3-4-5 count i have shared above

PS: before you slay me again, i was pointing out the wave form to expect after.

lol! in bold

i did.

1.You must have missed it in your persistent effort to troll
2. It was not a stop. A stop implies a short position. ATH + 1 was an invalidation of my wave B correction count. Sorry
3. If you had bothered to pay attention to what i post here, you would have seen the alternative counts i had. ALTERNATIVE COUNTS
4. I still disagree with your count. Having a hard time wrapping my head around your count. I believe i shared my objections to your count.

FYI

this was one of the altrnative counts showing an expected retracement and the start of another 5 wave move up

If you look close enough, you will see what happened after in the 2 charts that follow

PS: before you attack me again, the blue box implies another step up and the scale on the right should be ignored. I couldnt scale the chart up. The blue rectangle implied another similar move up to the previous blue box

PS 2: The 50% fib never materialized, instead it was a shallow 38% fib retracement to $1142

PS: before you attack me again, the blue box implies another step up and the scale on the right should be ignored. I couldnt scale the chart up. The blue rectangle implied another similar move up to the previous blue box

PS 2: The 50% fib never materialized, instead it was a shallow 38% fib retracement to $1142

PS 3: It is not about wrong or right.

PS 4: before you slay me again, the chart below projecting 1-2 -3 -4 -5 to a top C , ignore the scale, It is only supposed to show direction and impluses and corrections to expect

 

I only troll people who pretend to know everything including the way the market behaves, similarly to what you did with your "certain" $800 coins. Now you're "certain" CSW is part of a 4 member team who were Satoshi, and you have it on "reliable sources". Just full of shit when he couldn't prove anything besides fooling (or teaming up with?) a corrupted Gavin who seems to have forgotten what crypto is all about.

I enjoy most of what you post, but stirring up the pot with stupid affirmations just makes me want to call your BS.

And btw, if you had any balls left, you would've said "hey guys, my stop was at ATH +$1, so... I guess I was wrong about the $800 coins"; I have no problem with being wrong, I've been wrong countless of times and will be wrong again in the future, but pretending you were "right" when you weren't is below you.

edit: in the mean time, let me necro smth up

What would you say to the idea that the entire chart is one big cup and handle, starting with the late 2013 peak, with the cup ending at 1342.40 a few months ago followed by a relatively smallish handle?

EDIT: Actually it looks to me like it could be multiple nested cup and handles, three or maybe even four, one inside the other ... any reason that can't happen?

EDIT 2: In fact I could count five nested cup and handles. The smallest cup goes from March to July 2015, and has a handle that retraces nearly 100% of the way to the bottom of the cup (which perhaps disqualifies it from being a cup, idk). But the general trend from inner to outer cups is that the handle gets smaller in duration as well as in percentage of retrace.

Russian Doll cups, lol

source https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/9cIUsSfQ-BTCUSD-Raging-Bull-Tests-Key-Fibo-1480/

Pretty much. That is why it's called speculation, no one knows for sure what will happen. I find this subforum interesting nonetheless, because it is nice to get somewhat of an idea of the current market sentiment. Living (and dying) by the opinion of one (or even a few) experienced/knowledgeable trader(s) is stupid. You need to consider all of the information sources available to you, and then make your own informed decisions.

Except for those who bought in the past day or so everyone who has just bought and held bitcoin for years is in profit. Some who bought at the last ATH had to wait a few years which did take nerve, but lesson learned. I think new bitcoin investors are finally learning to ignore the talking heads, just put their bitcoin in cold storage and hold for the future. Vinny is particular was responsible for many selling prematurely and has no credibility left. 

And how is closing of valuable source of discussion going to solve the fact, that you put your entire self-worth as a human being on your immediate USD/BTC ownership, sir?

From what I could gather, even the best investors are right 50% of the time. The rest are bag holders and gamblers, regardless of the market.

Yeah, I think you should close this thread for good now!



I feel like a clown right now with no bitcoins left and my savings cut by 30%.

Master has spoken

Once again poschu picture. Slightly grown since)

means for wave structure - there arises final diagonal (tentatively). This wedge, it goes zigzag 1-2-3-4-5. If I am right, we are in the 3rd zigzag, the final stage. Subvolny W was 891 ... 1229 338 subvolny length X was 1229 ... 1142. And last subvolny Y began in 1142 and should end in 1142 + 338 = 1480.

If my suspicions are correct, the top will be around here (in 1425) to 1480.


https://vk.com/bitcoin_vanga?w=wall-130254204_1081

lol!


You have 'troll like' tendencies.

why i said make of this as you wish.

Do you always have to be a prick ?

Are you a prick in real life?

Is your source as reliable as the $800 indicator?

CSW is an impostor, nothing more than that...

Well, i have a reliable source

that says Satoshi Nakamoto was a 4 person team

and that Craig Wright and Daniel Kleiman were 2 of them

and that Ian Grigg was consulted for developing Bitcoin.


make of this as you wish.

I have nothing to gain from this

SATOSHI IS DEAD - LONG LIVE SATOSHI - TEAM LEADER COMES OUT


http://financialcryptography.com/mt/archives/001593.html

He hasnt got much evidence. Its stated in the article. Probobly just a marketing stunt for attention or/and goodwill for further projects related to this man. This game is clear, only his next project isnt.