Topic: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] ★ 400+ BTC Input ★ Altcoins ► Automated ► 125% Return - page 35. (Read 57106 times)

This problem is down to me using floating point values, in the next
major update it will be resolved, I believed we previously discussed
on the method of changing this to int and then just displaying the
values in decimal format just for appearance purposes.

Quick fix is sending 1 extra satoshi.

Do they still payout? or has it collapsed already 

That's odd.

TX-IN

That's simple get 5 ppl to deposit at least twice as much as you do and have 5 of their friends do the same!

this doesnt need be explained, he just want reduce the wait time, literally

Please explain, this comment makes absolutely no sense.

They never stopped, you can see it all on the blockchain as well!! https://blockchain.info/address/1Nine9waAcCQtDsAqM9XwqLnLSsgg1ij2o

You can be paid anytime within the 99 hours, shortening this would
mean everyone would have a less total time to accumulate wallet
balance to be paid out and would likely result in more expired deposits.

Just to make things clear, the 1Excalibur Rebate offers have all ended for the time being.

is there a way to shorten the time length? then 100 hrs.

The script its who is paying, not they
Its a simple game with 100 hours for get profit, i play here since the first day, and i have lost just 0.003btc and win more or less 0.04

are they still paying out?

There was no schedule to for this Rebate, but can I just ignore the above graph?
95be43e0a84727815ccc37bef9761d414cb5f2181c3dc3ac365d57161e829cdc

This is the first Rebate larger than $20 USD, that didn't go from our promotions department to 1Excalibur.

My explanation was that of a very basic non random related scenario where if the difficulty was up
at such a high queue level and there was a constant stream of payments it would take a longer amount
of time to be paid, although as seen from the game running all this time the majority of payments are left
until near their expiry time so this statement is kind of void.

The difficulty isn't really there, maybe per deposit round but not so much per countdown.

There are many variables to consider although the most "powerful" one is that of human perspective.

I just want to clearly display stats that players will be interested in, it's up to them to deposit or not.

On further consideration it's not logical to believe that previous deposits, either in great numbers or value, have much bearing on difficulty.  Previous deposits will eventually become 99hrs old and either be payedout or expire and this has little to do with whether any later deposits are payedout or expire.  The major factors are the time since previous deposit and the relation in size, neither are effected by the fate of other deposits.

I really have a hard time imagining this.  Does the difficulty really decrease if a TX is expired over being payout?  I think the decrease in difficulty you may imagine is from there being no new deposits, this has the effect of causing expirations.  That makes a lot of sense to me, if you "reverse cause and effect" then the above statement becomes true!

The effect, if there are no deposits, is expired deposits and this cause is also responsible for lowered difficulty.  In other words the sooner new players join the better it is, as being ahead of any other deposits lowers the difficulty.

These specific details are not worth much time dealing with.  I think the bounty on a deposit should be visible for at least 10hrs so that Players can sleep for 8hrs.  Once a Bounty is advertised it should be unchangeable.  It might be interesting to have the bounty increase as time goes on, growing to the configured Bounty.  For example the Bounty can be advertised at 12hrs and grow by %10 every hour from 11hrs to 1hr.

For a 1BTC deposit 1.3002BTC is needed, so a %30 bounty is .43333334 leaving .81666666 to be paid(I really do suck at math, sometimes).  It's a bit troublesome for the owner, but the target audience is the users looking for a good Bounty so the figures are represented to meet their needs.

Yes.
A previous payout is likely to leave a remaining balance that's applied to the next payout.  Any interim deposits and the final deposit, ignoring it's remaining balance.  Take all these figures and assign each address a portion of the Bounty.

Given three addresses each contributing BTC of A, B, and C.
Weighted Average??
Average = Bounty / (A + B + C)
Address(A) = Average * A
Address(B) = Average * B
Address(C) = Average * C

I know I simplified the equations without showing my work, but Average should be 0.3 for a %30 Bounty because (A + B + C) = 1.3002 and Bounty is 1.3002 / 0.3 or something??

After the round is over the deposit becomes expired, moving the game forward.  It's best to make a deposit that would payout the transaction, for only the %5 fee the value of the deposit grows by %130 and gain another 99hrs.

That's not true.  I believe the only thing making a deposit more or less difficult for a payout is the time since the previous deposit and even this is effect is marginal.  A small deposit is more likely to be paid out and such are more likely to make a difference.

I will try it again:

1. The owner of the deposit sets a bounty in percent to his deposit (must be done at least 10 hours before expire and will be fixed then)
    -> e.g. deposit of 1 BTC, bounty 30%
    -> Question: When will the players see this bounty? Directly? 10 hours before expire? After paiment?

2. If this deposit is paid, the owner will get the rest (without the deposit)
    -> 1BTC x 125% = 1.25BTC. Minus 30% = 0.875BTC

3. The bounty will be distributed to (all?) ppl, who are "involved". Means their deposits paid the original deposit?
    -> Bounty is 30% of 1.25BTC = 0.375BTC. This will be distributed to one or some ppl who deposited at the "correct" time. Correct?