Topic: Nitrobetting.eu - Unmatched BTC Betting and Entertainment 🎰📈🏀⚾🏈⚽ - page 8. (Read 7184 times)

UFC Fight Night: Rozenstruik vs. Almeida Preview

It's time for another night of UFC action! Tonight, we'll see Jairzinho Rozenstruik take on Jailton Almeida in the main event. Rozenstruik is coming off a loss to Curtis Blaydes, but he's still a dangerous striker with knockout power. Almeida is a rising star in the heavyweight division, and he's looking to make a statement tonight.

In the co-main event, Anthony Smith takes on Johnny Walker. Smith is a former light heavyweight champion, but he's coming off a loss to Magomed Ankalaev. Walker is a talented striker with knockout power, but he's also been inconsistent.

There are also a number of other exciting fights on the card, including:

Mackenzie Dern vs. Angela Hill
Edmen Shahbazyan vs. Anthony Hernandez
Maheshate vs. Viacheslav Borshchev
Michael Johnson vs. Diego Ferreira
Andre Fialho vs. Joaquin Buckley

Don't miss out on all the action! UFC Fight Night: Rozenstruik vs. Almeida is tonight at 7pm ET on ESPN+.

What’re you taking today?

Bet it here→ https://n2g.io/dab20e3

Thanks for the clarification with the account ownership but I think you misunderstood what we're talking about though.

AHOYBRAUSE was referring to the forum account related to your former sportsbook which is NitrogenSports since it had a bunch of negative feedback that wasn't solved.

Hi Nickess, of course. You can contact us via Twitter DM or by sending an email to our support team.

Thanks.

Hi:

Nitrobetting.eu is an anonymous platform. The account ownership process does not require sending copy of ID or any personal info. The rule is in place because of very rare instances where identity verification may be necessary, but in over 10 years we have no single case where that was the case. We don't ask for name, address, or other info, which means that any form of KYC is not necessary for this process (account ownership).

Well you should get your story straight because your terms say something different.

What else would "valid proof of identification" be when not KYC? haha
This support is hilarious. Maybe read your own terms again before answering here.

What I just find odd is the KYC requirements since a user can login back using same IP that he use before he became inactive to verify that he is the real owner.

Just to clarify. We do not request KYC. It has never been a requirement and never will. Our ownership process is internal and does adhere to our anonymity policy. No personal data is required at any point of the ownership.

Dormant account policy is not new and most of the casino have this kind of terms in their ToS. It’s fair that a year of inactivity should be subjected on this terms since the casino is not a bank for holding funds. Players should withdraw all the balance the moment they stop gambling.

What I just find odd is the KYC requirements since a user can login back using same IP that he use before he became inactive to verify that he is the real owner. Besides that, 10% fee is not bad because other casino charge more than that to all dormant. I will not drop names but you can check other casino ToS to find it for yourself.

In the meantime, you can browse this https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/--5419372 thread for this kind of discussion.

Hello, it is possible to talk to you in personal messages Nitrobetting please? I cant send you private because you dont have allow messages from newbies.

Thank you

Hi everyone!

This rule has been in place for years, even under the old site. As you can see from the fact there have been no reported issues with old accounts, there is nothing suspicious or problematic about the rule.

The rule was put in place around 2019-2020 when we realized dormant account funds were a risk and that possible account hacking could result in real clients losing their funds. Clients have the option to use a 2FA for extra security, but not all clients do and some deactivate the 2FA, and their funds are left unsecured for months, then years.  Therefore balances were removed/frozen as a precaution but for years they have been returned to clients and we haven't even bothered to charge a fee. As with any other sportsbook, our main concern is to reactivate clients and have them play again. So any case where account funds were removed and we were later contacted, we simply complete an ownership process with the client, and then funds are returned. The anonymity of our platform simply required that we added an extra security step in order to safeguard funds.

Having said that, and knowing full well the seasonal nature of our business (clients stop using their accounts for months at a time), we specifically collect funds after much more than 12 months of inactivity. This is a time frame we feel comfortable with and given the fact we have ten of thousands of inactive accounts, we felt it was safer to apply an extra verification process than running the risk of clients losing their funds.

We do not request KYC. Never has been a policy and never will. Our ownership process is internal and does adhere to our anonymity policy.

Thanks!

It used to be a good sportsbook. I remember chatting there for hours and getting decent wins while having some of the mods to talk to. Support was fast, misgraded slips are rectified pretty easily, and everything just went smooth. I heard of their rebranding but never bothered to look at its direction anymore after a lot of former loyal patrons of the site voiced out their opinions against the said platform.

These kinds of ToS, you'll only see in the banks. They'll argue it's for system and maintenance fee because you're using resources that they could free up to other people. If nitrobetting use that same excuse as to why they are taking the funds out of a dormant's account after a year, I'm pretty sure a lot of people will pull their funds out because it simply doesn't make sense as a bookie.

I just browsed nitrobetting's TOS just for fun and found an interesting information.



This might just be the most ridiculous rule at a casino/sportsbook I have ever seen.

If for any reason you dont play/deposit/withdraw for 1 year they just take your funds. Of course MIGHT get them back after kyc, but obviously that is not a given.
And on top of that they charge you 10% of your balance for no reason at all.

Things happen in life, you go to hospital, lose your phone/computer and can't login, even go to jail maybe. If that happens to you nitro will take full advantage of that, that's how nice they are.

Nitrobetting is pulling the same sketchy stuff they did with their previous site nitrogensports (which has plenty or red trust here), nothing has changed.

Hello, it is possible to talk to you in private messages Nitrobetting? thank you

Please tell us the specific leagues you need and we can make a request. =)

I also noticed that the number of basketball games from lower leagues is decreasing on the site. Would it be possible to expand this section?

Hello, please if you kindly let us know what leagues, and we'll gladly check.

It's true what you said, friend, from what I know, it looks like they already had a limited market before, so if there is an addition to a larger market, this is a pretty good development in the future so they will be able to offer more to gamblers.
But to be honest I'm not too sure that there will be development regarding the addition of a bigger market because if this happens it will require more budget.
For current odds providers it also seems like there is nothing they can count on.

I'd agree but it's probably best to bring that topic to the Reputation section and see if the other trusted members would be willing to move or follow up the old feedback on the new account.

Don't they have limited markets before? anyway, it's hard to expect much as that would depend on their current odds provider.

I am wondering about the development of Nitrobetting Sportsbook product. Recently you removed a lot of markets/leagues you have been covering in the past. It looks like you are no more offering any leagues apart from main markets. Are there any plans to bring back those lower markets into sportsbook again?

Instead of answering this strange post I would rather like to know why OP's feedback rating is so clean while their previous (sister) site has a lot of red feedback?

Wouldn't it be fair to transfer these feedbacks since it's confirmed the same people running this site/account as the original nitrogensports? https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/nitrogensports-88706




This just came to my mind.

 There are many advantages to the relationship between gambling and Bitcoin. Firstly, Bitcoin provides a secure and decentralized way to gamble online, which is attractive to many gamblers who value their privacy and security. Transactions are processed quickly and can be completed without third-party intermediaries, making it a popular choice for online gambling sites.

Another advantage of using Bitcoin for gambling is that it allows for more anonymity than traditional payment methods. This can be especially important for gamblers who wish to keep their gambling activities private.

Furthermore, Bitcoin transactions are often cheaper and faster than traditional banking methods, which can save gamblers money and time.

Many online casinos and sports betting sites now offer exclusive bonuses and promotions for Bitcoin users, which can provide gamblers with extra incentives to use Bitcoin for their online gambling activities.

Can you tell us another advantage of opening an account in a Bitcoin Sportsbook?