Your post buttress the point when they say going to school is scam or a waste of time. Well in as much as I ascribe to that but not in totality to say that being an A student or having high IQ doesn't matter because it does matter at least to have high IQ. Those who have high IQ despite not going to formal education but are more sharpened by the native intelligence they have and that is even why they would venture undoubtfully into grounds that are still untapped and infertile but yet making out a niche from it. If you don't have IQ then you won't be able to succeed in the first place.
Also, for those who didn't go to formal educational institutions before becoming rich and wealthy have also found the necessity to be educationally intune with the current happenings and in old age, they have equipped theirselves with enough educational qualifications too. So a C student who wasn't able to get to A student academically, it doesn't mean they are bereaved of intelligence quotient and that is also why anyone that applies either educational prowess or IQ has chances of financial success and if combined, the sky is your limit.
In reality, the time has come for more people with IQ to uplift their financial status with the bitcoin halving bull around the corner.
Topic: No Correlation Between Academic Success and Financial Success - page 6. (Read 637 times)
Before I say I agree, I want to explain a little about the differences in opinion regarding academic and financial success.
On average, students who are active and often cause problems are usually successful candidates because students who are considered the source of problems are too brave to do things that make them curious to try.
Our society tends to judge that the benchmark for success is the level of education pursued. I do not agree with assessing success from the perspective of higher education but rather from the courage to act based on experience.
This means I agree with you in assessing the differences between the two.
On average, students who are active and often cause problems are usually successful candidates because students who are considered the source of problems are too brave to do things that make them curious to try.
Our society tends to judge that the benchmark for success is the level of education pursued. I do not agree with assessing success from the perspective of higher education but rather from the courage to act based on experience.
This means I agree with you in assessing the differences between the two.
We have seen that it has been debated that there are more A students who work for C students or there are C students who earn more than A students. Personally I don't believe any of this premise. What I believe is that it doesn't matter whether you are an A student or have a high IQ. Rather it's about having the courage to venture into unchattered territories, including taking calculated risk and making the most of the opportunities that lead to high income. In our society today and in the past, the people who have demonstrated audacity and capitalized on privileged advantages to undertake risky yet lucrative business ideas are the ones who end up being of great influence and earn more. Do you agree?
fastercapital.com/startup-topic/Taking-Calculated-Risks.html
And that's what really happens nowadays. Mostly those students who excel in their class before are having a hard time to find a job, to do business or let's say they are facing the real world very hard while student C excel in Businesses and work, sometimes those people who didn't finish their colleges are usually ended up being a successful entrepreneur and earning a lot than a person who has a degree being a corporate slave. I'm not saying you shouldn't study, but if you look at it, It serves as a motivation. We can't predict a person's future based on their academic skills and grades, it's all about how you can face the real world after your study. fastercapital.com/startup-topic/Taking-Calculated-Risks.html
We have seen that it has been debated that there are more A students who work for C students or there are C students who earn more than A students. Personally I don't believe any of this premise.
But that is the reality. Because you have the knowledge to read and pass and become exceptionally known to be very brilliant in class, it does not translate to having exposure, opportunity and the ability to earn money more. What I believe is that it doesn't matter whether you are an A student or have a high IQ. Rather it's about having the courage to venture into unchattered territories, including taking calculated risk and making the most of the opportunities that lead to high income. In our society today and in the past, the people who have demonstrated audacity and capitalized on privileged advantages to undertake risky yet lucrative business ideas are the ones who end up being of great influence and earn more. Do you agree?
This is motivational. All are motivational. If you are not that good in class, you still have hope that you can be rich which is not wrong and it is the truth. Because you are not brilliant in school, that does not mean you are not talented in other aspect of life. But I agree with you, with self-discipline included. 
We have seen that it has been debated that there are more A students who work for C students or there are C students who earn more than A students. Personally I don't believe any of this premise. What I believe is that it doesn't matter whether you are an A student or have a high IQ. Rather it's about having the courage to venture into unchattered territories, including taking calculated risk and making the most of the opportunities that lead to high income. In our society today and in the past, the people who have demonstrated audacity and capitalized on privileged advantages to undertake risky yet lucrative business ideas are the ones who end up being of great influence and earn more. Do you agree?
fastercapital.com/startup-topic/Taking-Calculated-Risks.html
fastercapital.com/startup-topic/Taking-Calculated-Risks.html
Jump to: