Pages:
Author

Topic: No FCC or UL label on BFL's Jalapeño - page 6. (Read 9682 times)

hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
April 28, 2013, 12:22:32 AM
#17
Proof: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=resTnZa3erg&feature=youtu.be

The accompanying "brick" clearly shows the label, and if it didn't one, the supply sure as hell wouldn't have applied for it. The UL is definitely required being that it's a outlet plug of sorts.

If the FCC requirement wasn't important, then Josh wouldn't have taken the time to lie about getting certified.

When is the Jalapeno getting FCC approval?

Maybe two weeks? We are waiting for the test lab to issue the test report.

With the bump in power requirements on the MR and the new screen, we had to make changes, although the new screen is already certified.  We are doing all the devices at once, since they all share the same board.


The video is proof that this is a customer's unit and not that of a developer, therefore, at this speaking, Butterfly Labs is breaking the law.

Also, as of Friday, BFL has not apply for FCC approval of any of their units. To be clear, if the FCC received a unit in their facility on Thursday from some entity, it would most definitely be on this website on Friday: https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm?calledFromFrame=N

Search it yourself.


+1 ... but now will anyone do anything about this at all? That might be the real question right?
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
April 28, 2013, 12:05:05 AM
#16
FCC web site says testing only takes 1-2 days if it passes on the first test.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
April 27, 2013, 11:55:19 PM
#15
Zero fucks given, regarding presence or non-presence said stickers. [Pssst. I tore the label off my mattress too!]  Roll Eyes

That is the correct response. Unless their chip emits RF which hoses up your Bluetooth causing your wireless game controllers to glitch causing you to die in HALO.
Then you rage.  Grin

Really, the only people who are going to care is BFL and the FCC. Unless BFL ends up in court over something, then the plaintiff would care.

Eh.. Yes and no..

It should get certified for lots of reasons.

If it's not UL listed, I sure as hell wouldn't plug it in.  There ABSOLUTELY have been cases of insurance companies refusing to pay for a burned down house/building because the fire was caused by an unlisted device.

Enigma

Yeah, UL is a different story. The FCC stuff is pretty benign...unless you get malignant tumors from RF. Then not so benign.
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
April 27, 2013, 11:46:09 PM
#14
Zero fucks given, regarding presence or non-presence said stickers. [Pssst. I tore the label off my mattress too!]  Roll Eyes

That is the correct response. Unless their chip emits RF which hoses up your Bluetooth causing your wireless game controllers to glitch causing you to die in HALO.
Then you rage.  Grin

Really, the only people who are going to care is BFL and the FCC. Unless BFL ends up in court over something, then the plaintiff would care.

Eh.. Yes and no..

It should get certified for lots of reasons.

If it's not UL listed, I sure as hell wouldn't plug it in.  There ABSOLUTELY have been cases of insurance companies refusing to pay for a burned down house/building because the fire was caused by an unlisted device.

Enigma
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
April 27, 2013, 11:41:42 PM
#13
Zero fucks given, regarding presence or non-presence said stickers. [Pssst. I tore the label off my mattress too!]  Roll Eyes

That is the correct response. Unless their chip emits RF which hoses up your Bluetooth causing your wireless game controllers to glitch causing you to die in HALO.
Then you rage.  Grin

Really, the only people who are going to care is BFL and the FCC. Unless BFL ends up in court over something, then the plaintiff would care.
full member
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
April 27, 2013, 11:31:40 PM
#12
Does the FCC have a clause stating that if less than X units are built and shipped, then FCC certification doesn't apply?
No such exemption exists.  FCC Certification is mandatory for the BFL Products (And Avalon, I might add)

Enigma
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
April 27, 2013, 11:31:00 PM
#11
Zero fucks given, regarding presence or non-presence said stickers. [Pssst. I tore the label off my mattress too!]  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 27, 2013, 11:18:14 PM
#10
FCC approval takes a lot of time and money, just saying...

In the US, all products containing electronics that oscillate above 9 kHz must be certified. The law that governs this is FCC Part 15 (Title 47 CFR Part 15). Should cost less than $20K. This cert might be what is holding up their bulk product shipments. Who knows, BFL is a black box that says they will ship black boxes.

Does the FCC have a clause stating that if less than X units are built and shipped, then FCC certification doesn't apply?
I don't know.

Also, I don't know what you're referring to regarding black boxes, for I clearly see a logo on them.
black box 
Noun
Any complex piece of equipment, typically a unit in an electronic system, with contents that are mysterious to the user.

Ironically, that's the first thing that came to mind when I read the term, immediately thinking back to high school in science class where we had to build a black box out using a shoe box and put an item in it so the rest of the class can deduce what's inside. What I put inside mine was...wait for it...a key (seriously--a common, obsolete house key).
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
April 27, 2013, 11:07:08 PM
#9
FCC approval takes a lot of time and money, just saying...

In the US, all products containing electronics that oscillate above 9 kHz must be certified. The law that governs this is FCC Part 15 (Title 47 CFR Part 15). Should cost less than $20K. This cert might be what is holding up their bulk product shipments. Who knows, BFL is a black box that says they will ship black boxes.

Does the FCC have a clause stating that if less than X units are built and shipped, then FCC certification doesn't apply?
I don't know.

Also, I don't know what you're referring to regarding black boxes, for I clearly see a logo on them.
black box 
Noun
Any complex piece of equipment, typically a unit in an electronic system, with contents that are mysterious to the user.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 502
April 27, 2013, 10:51:04 PM
#8
Interesting.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 27, 2013, 10:50:37 PM
#7
FCC approval takes a lot of time and money, just saying...

In the US, all products containing electronics that oscillate above 9 kHz must be certified. The law that governs this is FCC Part 15 (Title 47 CFR Part 15). Should cost less than $20K. This cert might be what is holding up their bulk product shipments. Who knows, BFL is a black box that says they will ship black boxes.

Does the FCC have a clause stating that if less than X units are built and shipped, then FCC certification doesn't apply?

Also, I don't know what you're referring to regarding black boxes, for I clearly see a logo on them.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
April 27, 2013, 10:24:26 PM
#6
FCC approval takes a lot of time and money, just saying...

In the US, all products containing electronics that oscillate above 9 kHz must be certified. The law that governs this is FCC Part 15 (Title 47 CFR Part 15). Should cost less than $20K. This cert might be what is holding up their bulk product shipments. Who knows, BFL is a black box that says they will ship black boxes.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 27, 2013, 09:36:28 PM
#5
FCC approval takes a lot of time and money, just saying...

I assume it's a lot cheaper than the imposed fines that can run into hundreds of thousands of dollars on manufacturers and retailers who sell products that don't conform.
full member
Activity: 215
Merit: 101
April 27, 2013, 09:32:46 PM
#4
Don't upset the apple cart.
full member
Activity: 174
Merit: 100
April 27, 2013, 09:24:56 PM
#3
FCC approval takes a lot of time and money, just saying...
newbie
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
April 27, 2013, 09:13:33 PM
#2
And no one gave a flying fuck.
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
April 27, 2013, 09:06:23 PM
#1
Proof: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=resTnZa3erg&feature=youtu.be

The accompanying "brick" clearly shows the label, and if it didn't one, the supply sure as hell wouldn't have applied for it. The UL is definitely required being that it's a outlet plug of sorts.

If the FCC requirement wasn't important, then Josh wouldn't have taken the time to lie about getting certified.

When is the Jalapeno getting FCC approval?

Maybe two weeks? We are waiting for the test lab to issue the test report.

With the bump in power requirements on the MR and the new screen, we had to make changes, although the new screen is already certified.  We are doing all the devices at once, since they all share the same board.


The video is proof that this is a customer's unit and not that of a developer, therefore, at this speaking, Butterfly Labs is breaking the law.

Also, as of Friday, BFL has not apply for FCC approval of any of their units. To be clear, if the FCC received a unit in their facility on Thursday from some entity, it would most definitely be on this website on Friday: https://apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/eas/reports/GenericSearch.cfm?calledFromFrame=N

Search it yourself.
Pages:
Jump to: