I agree with the Non-KYC because this is the experience of the crypto becoming anonymous and being transparent. You don't need to get worried about your data we know how does people use the data of other people even though they say that "we protect your data." There's no safe on the internet right now the cons only I've seen here is the recovery of the account the assurance of the player for their accounts are lessen if their devices get comprise by other people the casino does not have the capability if there's no KYC for verification the real owner. Having a level 1 KYC is enough for me im not a large gambler large withdrawal is not too much issue.
Every casino whether it supports KYC or Non-KYC, there are always good and bad things, it depends on how people want to choose, as you said, nothing is safe on the internet, so don't try to gamble if you don't want other people to know your identity because gambling at offline casinos may be free with that and anyone can go to do that, if there are no problems and want convenience of course online casinos are better than offline casinos.
Yes, it's true that Non-KYC might have shortcomings, such as recovering a hacked account or something like that, if without KYC it's a bit difficult to recognize the original account owner and I've experienced problems like that, actually it depends on the perspective of each party, I too There's never been a problem with KYC level 1 because as a small gambler I don't need to send my identity at KYC level 2 because I'm just a small gambler maybe just like you and so far I've never had problems with withdrawals.
