Topic: No..Craig Wright Was NOT Named Bitcoin's Creator - page 2. (Read 514 times)
Thank you for writing this up! Just sent this over to my buddies as I woke up the other day to texts from a couple buddies who were discussing the lawsuit / craig wright having won and tried explaining how this absolutely does not say that Craig is Satoshi. If pretty easy to see this is the case after all.
Craig Steven Wright comes across as grumpy and whiny and a liar, and Satoshi comes across as a technologist who communicates as expected and is concise and balanced.
Basically, Craig should focus more on how Satoshi communicates and try to imitate him, because the more Craig talks and acts, the more people will judge him as unlike Satoshi and will ignore him.
and regarding this news, everyone who has been in the industry for a long time will never believe Craig, and those who are new and most likely will believe it before doing any actual investigation. and he will continue to poison every new bitcoin user into believing that Satoshi Nakamoto is him.
Basically, Craig should focus more on how Satoshi communicates and try to imitate him, because the more Craig talks and acts, the more people will judge him as unlike Satoshi and will ignore him.
and regarding this news, everyone who has been in the industry for a long time will never believe Craig, and those who are new and most likely will believe it before doing any actual investigation. and he will continue to poison every new bitcoin user into believing that Satoshi Nakamoto is him.
He just grab the opportunity to tell that because he knows Satoshi so that he will get instant fame for the coin he didn't created he has a hard face telling that he is the real one while he didn't have any proof about that claims. Maybe they can fool new people especially those who didn't get informed about the certain drama happening here. That's why its good to have these kind of discussion since this could influence newbie to not believe on what those clown says or claims.
Craig Steven Wright comes across as grumpy and whiny and a liar, and Satoshi comes across as a technologist who communicates as expected and is concise and balanced.
Basically, Craig should focus more on how Satoshi communicates and try to imitate him, because the more Craig talks and acts, the more people will judge him as unlike Satoshi and will ignore him.
and regarding this news, everyone who has been in the industry for a long time will never believe Craig, and those who are new and most likely will believe it before doing any actual investigation. and he will continue to poison every new bitcoin user into believing that Satoshi Nakamoto is him.
Basically, Craig should focus more on how Satoshi communicates and try to imitate him, because the more Craig talks and acts, the more people will judge him as unlike Satoshi and will ignore him.
and regarding this news, everyone who has been in the industry for a long time will never believe Craig, and those who are new and most likely will believe it before doing any actual investigation. and he will continue to poison every new bitcoin user into believing that Satoshi Nakamoto is him.
he has been ordered to pay $100 million dollars which will bankrupt him many times over
I guess there is a silver lining after all.I'm not familiar with the legal system, specially the western type but it seems to me that essentially he has been playing the legal system to progress his scams. The media seems to love him too since by creating "attractive" titles they get a ton of traffic which may be considered a win for him lol.
Nah, he will just create another scamcoin to sell to his followers and it will all be good or have someone rewrite parts of the BSV code to give him 2 million coins, sell them on the market for $100 each and poof he has the money.
And since he could "move" those coins that means he must be the creator.
-Dave
Just gonna drop this one here:
Source: Twitter
In less than 50 days is the Hodlonaut court case. "Satoshi" will be in even more debts...
Here's something just for fun https://twitter.com/21minimal/status/1467918023042469891
Source: Twitter
In less than 50 days is the Hodlonaut court case. "Satoshi" will be in even more debts...
Here's something just for fun https://twitter.com/21minimal/status/1467918023042469891
he has been ordered to pay $100 million dollars which will bankrupt him many times over
I guess there is a silver lining after all.I'm not familiar with the legal system, specially the western type but it seems to me that essentially he has been playing the legal system to progress his scams. The media seems to love him too since by creating "attractive" titles they get a ton of traffic which may be considered a win for him lol.
Please please please read the entire article before making assumptions. We already have people in the IRC and Reddit already spreading FUD regarding these headlines.
As far as I know, there have been spammers on forums, social media and chatrooms for many many years. They usually promote ethereum and ripple. Their promotion and spam may coincide with the pump side, of pump and dump cycles for alts. In past years, they enjoyed some success. Many fell for the false hype and contrived marketing campaigns. In recent years, their effectiveness appears to be on a decline. Fewer are buying things like bitcoin cash. If nothing else, it appears to be giving people a life experience which will give them greater odds of success, than in previous years.
The boy who cried wolf only had to be wrong twice to lose his credibility. Saruman the White strained his vocal power of persuasion until it was broken and destroyed. It appears something similar is happening with the people of the world, who no longer blindly believe everything that they read or see on TV.
Here we go again with these news outlets. As many of you have maybe read, Craig Wright won the lawsuit in Miami over a dispute over $50,000,000,000 in bitcoin. This issue is the media is writing misleading headlines suggesting Craig Wright won a lawsuit over whether he was bitcoin's creator or not. They continue to lace their articles with misleading notions suggesting the lawsuit was over whether CW is Satoshi or not.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/06/miami-jury-rules-in-favor-of-craig-wright-bitcoin-claimed-inventor.html
https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/21/12/24467590/bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto-is-craig-wright-alone-according-to-kleiman-v-wright-jury
Please please please read the entire article before making assumptions. We already have people in the IRC and Reddit already spreading FUD regarding these headlines.
We all know what he has to do to prove he is who he says he is.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/12/06/miami-jury-rules-in-favor-of-craig-wright-bitcoin-claimed-inventor.html
https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/21/12/24467590/bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto-is-craig-wright-alone-according-to-kleiman-v-wright-jury
Please please please read the entire article before making assumptions. We already have people in the IRC and Reddit already spreading FUD regarding these headlines.
We all know what he has to do to prove he is who he says he is.
These journalist are most likely accomplice of him. This is the reason why I don't really take media seriously nowadays, especially when it comes to these type of topics. Although the media surely does a good job reporting the happenings in the world, bias articles like these are what's really turning me off.
I think that man is an attention seeker and it could be those journalists who were paid by him, isn't it?
I read it here different threads about him and it's claiming that he is the real Satoshi which in fact, he doesn't have any evidence to prove his claim.
Sometimes I'm thinking that he has a mental illness and I wonder he isn't in jail after all. Probably because claiming to be a Satoshi isn't a fraud either he isWright or Wrong about his claim which is technically don't have any single proof of legitimacy.
People should aware of this misleading information.
I read it here different threads about him and it's claiming that he is the real Satoshi which in fact, he doesn't have any evidence to prove his claim.
Sometimes I'm thinking that he has a mental illness and I wonder he isn't in jail after all. Probably because claiming to be a Satoshi isn't a fraud either he is
People should aware of this misleading information.
I really wonder why anyone gives this man any attention at all. It should be known that he is definitely not Satoshi.
The proof would be easy to make, but he can't. So he isn't. This smear theater he's putting on doesn't do justice to the real Satoshi.
He isn't really satoshi and we all knew it.The proof would be easy to make, but he can't. So he isn't. This smear theater he's putting on doesn't do justice to the real Satoshi.
It's that these media men are giving attention to him. Maybe even if they don't want to give attention to him, there's this paid coverage for them to cover the news.
As if to be "big" on the eyes of the world since they're reporting it.
Crypto-related journalism has always been garbage, it's basically an arms race of clickbaits between dozens of low-quality sites, the only thing that matters to them is making SHOCKING titles and getting that ad revenue. I'm getting all my crypto news from this forum, because if something remarkable happens, someone will create a thread here.
It's kinda bad that a lot of beginners will get misled by these news, but what can we do? Not everyone visits this forum or social media.
It's kinda bad that a lot of beginners will get misled by these news, but what can we do? Not everyone visits this forum or social media.
Funny part is :
-taken from the article you mentioned
The guy did not win the title of Satoshi ofcourse but he did win the whole case, but I won't say whole but partial perse since he still has to pay money.
Journalists have no idea about the whole bitcoin community perse and at the same time sometimes people might pay them to make such statements.
We all know that the man is not Satoshi ofcourse but at the same time I have also seen these FUD's stirring around and the articles calling him Satoshi as well.
-Not his keys!! Not his Coins!!
Quote
However, Wright was ordered to pay $100 million in compensatory damages over a breach in intellectual property rights related to W&K Info Defense Research LLC, a joint venture between the two men. That money will go to W&K directly, rather than to the Kleiman estate.
-taken from the article you mentioned
The guy did not win the title of Satoshi ofcourse but he did win the whole case, but I won't say whole but partial perse since he still has to pay money.
Journalists have no idea about the whole bitcoin community perse and at the same time sometimes people might pay them to make such statements.
We all know that the man is not Satoshi ofcourse but at the same time I have also seen these FUD's stirring around and the articles calling him Satoshi as well.
-Not his keys!! Not his Coins!!
Talking about journalists, they dont have a clue about Bitcoin.full stop
They dont care about the truth or facts in this case, its lazy journalism,
grab some crap from the internet and run with it.
Apologies in advance for this but here is an example of some absolute embarrasing
thrash from 2016 which showed up in my news feed today, somebody/something
assumed this was relevant to the recent courtcase and that I needed to read,
this is nonsense upon nonsence which people are being fed>
https://m.independent.ie/business/technology/news/identity-of-inventor-of-bitcoin-creator-finally-revealed-as-craig-wright-34676862.html
Quote
The creator was previously known under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto to protect his identity, but he has now been named as Australian Dr Craig Wright.
The computer scientist, inventor and academic launched the protocol in 2009 and his identity was shrouded in mystery.
Dr Wright said he decided to reveal himself as the Bitcoin creator to stop the spread of "misinformation" about the cryptocurrency and its digital infrastructure Blockchain.
The computer scientist, inventor and academic launched the protocol in 2009 and his identity was shrouded in mystery.
Dr Wright said he decided to reveal himself as the Bitcoin creator to stop the spread of "misinformation" about the cryptocurrency and its digital infrastructure Blockchain.
Quote
The scientist has digitally signed messages to prove his identity, and Jon Matonis, one of the founding directors of the Bitcoin Foundation said he is convinced Dr Wright is who he claims to be.
Funnily enough there is no author assigned to that article.
Where are the consequences for these journalists who continue to write
incorrect misleading information? there doesnt seem to be any.
I really wonder why anyone gives this man any attention at all. It should be known that he is definitely not Satoshi.
The proof would be easy to make, but he can't. So he isn't. This smear theater he's putting on doesn't do justice to the real Satoshi.
To be honest, that guy shouldn't even be mentioned on this forum as what he wants and enjoy in is attention. And if we can tell anyiting about Satoshi and the way he tied to keep his privacy, he obviously wanted as little attention as possible. Therefore, conclusion about CSW is obvious. The proof would be easy to make, but he can't. So he isn't. This smear theater he's putting on doesn't do justice to the real Satoshi.
Well, I've read the article you verified. But the content you already know in the media from CNBC is just distorting the facts. Because they are government media that claim to be independent, is that true?
Craig Wright always stands out like he is......... ah I don't want to say that because I don't recognize him as anyone. Then the media so often treat this to divert the real issue.
Remember one thing we need to instill in future generations, That Satoshi is not he, he and she..... Not anyone who claims to be Satoshi. It does not exist and will never be recognized. Why ? because the hero will not reveal his true identity (Unless you are watching the Marvel Series). Even though we don't know who he is, the most important thing is that Bitcoin is still Bitcoin even though it is in a block of opposite Blockchain.
Craig Wright always stands out like he is......... ah I don't want to say that because I don't recognize him as anyone. Then the media so often treat this to divert the real issue.
Remember one thing we need to instill in future generations, That Satoshi is not he, he and she..... Not anyone who claims to be Satoshi. It does not exist and will never be recognized. Why ? because the hero will not reveal his true identity (Unless you are watching the Marvel Series). Even though we don't know who he is, the most important thing is that Bitcoin is still Bitcoin even though it is in a block of opposite Blockchain.
No one believed this old man, but he felt certain that he was the inventor.
Well, all crypto enthusiasts must know who Craig Wright is. He is an annoying man, a fake Satoshi who tried to attract people's attention to his business. We already ignore whatever he did. But seeing media endorses Craig Wright as a real Satoshi is very funny, who they are? And how can they decide who Satoshi is? This is totally wrong and execrable, even all discussions in this forum cannot find out any signs of the real Satoshi is. I mean the media has no capacity to write on who Satoshi is, they have no strong reasons.People still read this news articles? In this day and age, we don't see any journalists that delivers the truth if it doesn't further their own agenda so I don't know why people still read this articles, this is a bait title so you can be intrigued and click their article and read it, it is intended to be misleading.
Well, news outlets are all about headlines. It is their bread and butter!!! It is all about grabbing attention, getting people to read these ridiculous articles even if they're often biased, misleading and not representative. Seems to me that if you've been around long enough you understand that what media says is not exactly true, and this is no different (though, I wish more people were using their heads and not believe everything they read)...
In this case, of course Craig hasn't proved a thing and never will. We all know just how simple proving ownership of Bitcoin is and yet this had never been done.
Craig Wright is just a bullshit man who claims to be the inventor of bitcoin. No one believed this old man, but he felt certain that he was the inventor. he couldn't prove anything about the invention of bitcoin to date.
Craig Wright never had the access key to the satoshi wallet.
Craig Wright never had the access key to the satoshi wallet.
I really wonder why anyone gives this man any attention at all. It should be known that he is definitely not Satoshi.
The proof would be easy to make, but he can't. So he isn't. This smear theater he's putting on doesn't do justice to the real Satoshi.
The proof would be easy to make, but he can't. So he isn't. This smear theater he's putting on doesn't do justice to the real Satoshi.
People are giving attention to him especially those newcomers because they are reading misleading information. They thought that Craig Wright won and that he's the bitcoin creator. But the good thing about winning on his case, he said, if he will win on this trial, he will prove his bitcoin ownership. So this is very interesting if he can indeed prove about those btc holdings. If he can't, then, this is just another shameful act from him. Because I have the feeling that he can't prove his ownership to satoshi's bitcoins because he is not Satoshi.
I really wonder why anyone gives this man any attention at all. It should be known that he is definitely not Satoshi.
The proof would be easy to make, but he can't. So he isn't. This smear theater he's putting on doesn't do justice to the real Satoshi.
The proof would be easy to make, but he can't. So he isn't. This smear theater he's putting on doesn't do justice to the real Satoshi.
Funny part is :
-taken from the article you mentioned
The guy did not win the title of Satoshi ofcourse but he did win the whole case, but I won't say whole but partial perse since he still has to pay money.
Journalists have no idea about the whole bitcoin community perse and at the same time sometimes people might pay them to make such statements.
We all know that the man is not Satoshi ofcourse but at the same time I have also seen these FUD's stirring around and the articles calling him Satoshi as well.
-Not his keys!! Not his Coins!!
Quote
However, Wright was ordered to pay $100 million in compensatory damages over a breach in intellectual property rights related to W&K Info Defense Research LLC, a joint venture between the two men. That money will go to W&K directly, rather than to the Kleiman estate.
-taken from the article you mentioned
The guy did not win the title of Satoshi ofcourse but he did win the whole case, but I won't say whole but partial perse since he still has to pay money.
Journalists have no idea about the whole bitcoin community perse and at the same time sometimes people might pay them to make such statements.
We all know that the man is not Satoshi ofcourse but at the same time I have also seen these FUD's stirring around and the articles calling him Satoshi as well.
-Not his keys!! Not his Coins!!
Jump to: