Pages:
Author

Topic: Not Bitcoin XT - page 12. (Read 21893 times)

staff
Activity: 3458
Merit: 6793
Just writing some code
August 16, 2015, 09:31:22 PM
#9
Think twice before you run this:

1. Have you reviewed the code?
I just looked at the code and it looks like the only things changed are two lines which change the date from 1452470400 (11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 UTC) to UINT_MAX which IIRC is 4294967295 (02/07/2106 @ 6:28am (UTC)). So he didn't actually stop the hard fork in those clients, but rather postponed it for another 91 years. OP, you should fix that.

2. This thing does no real harm unless you are really mining. With >90% of mining pools are not anonymous, do you think they will use their real name to run a spoof client?

3. Running XT means you support BIP101. Period.
Exactly. It has the same features (double spend relaying, etc.) and it uses the same block versions. The only difference is that it will not accept the forked block as valid for another 91 years.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1111
August 16, 2015, 09:02:23 PM
#8
Think twice before you run this:

1. Have you reviewed the code?

2. This thing does no real harm unless you are really mining. With >90% of mining pools are not anonymous, do you think they will use their real name to run a spoof client?

3. Running XT means you support BIP101. Period.

legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1111
August 16, 2015, 08:56:52 PM
#7
This is such a terrible idea. Why would you want to spoof Bitcoin XT, it will just cause the fork to happen before consensus occurs and if enough people were using that fork, you suddenly just screwed over Bitcoin. Please don't do this, it is such a bad idea. Have you actually considered the consequences of a premature fork? If you haven't, please do think about what could happen to the Bitcoin network if a premature hard fork occurs.

Are you the reason that it looks like Bitcoin XT is gaining traction on bitnodes?

No worry, asking mining pools to run this crap is even harder than asking them to run the real XT.
staff
Activity: 3458
Merit: 6793
Just writing some code
August 16, 2015, 08:53:25 PM
#6
This is such a terrible idea. Why would you want to spoof Bitcoin XT, it will just cause the fork to happen before consensus occurs and if enough people were using that fork, you suddenly just screwed over Bitcoin. Please don't do this, it is such a bad idea. Have you actually considered the consequences of a premature fork? If you haven't, please do think about what could happen to the Bitcoin network if a premature hard fork occurs.

Are you the reason that it looks like Bitcoin XT is gaining traction on bitnodes?
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
August 16, 2015, 08:37:52 PM
#5

All you are doing is to make XT looks stronger, thank you.


"All warfare is based on deception.  If your opponent is vain, flatter him."  - Sun Tzu
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
August 16, 2015, 08:34:29 PM
#4
This is a special fork for those who do not agree with the blocksize scheduled increase as proposed by Gavin and Mike in their divisive altcoin fork, "Bitcoin XT".

This version can be used to protect the status quo until real technical consensus is formed about the blocksize.

This version is indistinguishable from Bitcoin XT 0.11A except that it will not actually hard fork to BIP101, yet appears on the p2p network as Bitcoin XT 0.11A replete with features, yet at a consensus level behaves just like Bitcoin Core 0.11. If it is used to mine, it will produce XT block versions without actually supporting >1MB blocks.

Running this version and/or mining with XT block versions will make it impossible for the Bitcoin XT network to detect the correct switchover and cause a premature fork of anyone foolish enough to support BIP101 without wide consensus from the technical community.

It prevents correct detection of Bitcoin XT adoption in the wild since usage will be known to have been tampered with and thus all statistical data gathered by getnodes can only be considered unreliable.

https://github.com/xtbit/notbitcoinxt#not-bitcoin-xt

OMG a spoof node?  Gimme!  Nobody could have possibly predicted this would happen!

BRB lighting up some data centers...

Heh, XT now has us right where we want it...  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1111
August 16, 2015, 08:29:40 PM
#3
getnodes is never reliable as people can always use a botnet to run whatever clients they want. All you are doing is to make XT looks stronger, thank you.

For mining, >90% miners are not anonymous, and >68% has already announced their supports to a block size increase. They may not adopt XT, but don't you believe they will sabotage XT with their real names?

Nice try and try harder.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
August 16, 2015, 08:28:10 PM
#2
YESSS!!! Bitcoiners trying to hurt bitcoiners over some stupid political squabble!

The world has not seen such entertainment since Christians killed Christians over the right way to be a Christian in the Thirty Years' War
legendary
Activity: 3430
Merit: 1142
Ιntergalactic Conciliator
August 16, 2015, 07:42:25 PM
#1
This is a special fork for those who do not agree with the blocksize scheduled increase as proposed by Gavin and Mike in their divisive altcoin fork, "Bitcoin XT".

This version can be used to protect the status quo until real technical consensus is formed about the blocksize.

This version is indistinguishable from Bitcoin XT 0.11A except that it will not actually hard fork to BIP101, yet appears on the p2p network as Bitcoin XT 0.11A replete with features, yet at a consensus level behaves just like Bitcoin Core 0.11. If it is used to mine, it will produce XT block versions without actually supporting >1MB blocks.

Running this version and/or mining with XT block versions will make it impossible for the Bitcoin XT network to detect the correct switchover and cause a premature fork of anyone foolish enough to support BIP101 without wide consensus from the technical community.

It prevents correct detection of Bitcoin XT adoption in the wild since usage will be known to have been tampered with and thus all statistical data gathered by getnodes can only be considered unreliable.

https://github.com/xtbit/notbitcoinxt#not-bitcoin-xt
Pages:
Jump to: