win7-64-r9-280x-15.7 driver
nsgminer --neoscrypt -g 1 -w 128 -I 16 -o stratum+tcp://strat.dnb.io:3028 -O ygi.1:1234
what's wrong?
Topic: NSGminer v0.9.4: The Fastest NeoScrypt GPU Miner - page 27. (Read 221777 times)
win7-64-r9-280x-15.7 driver
nsgminer --neoscrypt -g 1 -w 128 -I 16 -o stratum+tcp://strat.dnb.io:3028 -O ygi.1:1234
what's wrong?
I have compiled and uploaded the 64-bit Windows binaries per numerous requests. Tested fine on a Win7 notebook I've got recently.
https://github.com/ghostlander/nsgminer/releases/tag/nsgminer-v0.9.0
Wolf0, your kernel distributed by NiceHash with their miner is also well done, could use an idea or two out of it. One of my primary concerns was to get rid of scratch register usage to run more than one wavefront concurrently, but FastKDF seems to be too complicated to fit VRegs and SRegs alone. Although I've cut the scratch reg usage down by half which also helps.
https://github.com/ghostlander/nsgminer/releases/tag/nsgminer-v0.9.0
Wolf0, your kernel distributed by NiceHash with their miner is also well done, could use an idea or two out of it. One of my primary concerns was to get rid of scratch register usage to run more than one wavefront concurrently, but FastKDF seems to be too complicated to fit VRegs and SRegs alone. Although I've cut the scratch reg usage down by half which also helps.
no there's no irony in NeoScrypt fans celebrating a faster miner 
ghostlanderyou have miners for miners windows
NSGminer v0.9.0 (NeoScrypt GPU miner) is available, see the OP. Over 2x performance of the current SGminer.
HD7990 (two Tahiti GPUs, downvolted and downclocked to 850MHz core / 1250MHz memory) delivers 680KH/s for me.
R9 280X (unlucky one with Elpida memory, 1050MHz core / 1600MHz memory) = 400KH/s
HD6970 = 120KH/s, HD5870 = 100KH/s
Happy New Year!
HD7990 (two Tahiti GPUs, downvolted and downclocked to 850MHz core / 1250MHz memory) delivers 680KH/s for me.
R9 280X (unlucky one with Elpida memory, 1050MHz core / 1600MHz memory) = 400KH/s
HD6970 = 120KH/s, HD5870 = 100KH/s
Happy New Year!
Happy New Year to you too!
A Windows build for download is very welcome
Please help, I cannot build it.Thankz in advance.
sent you 250 ORB
sent you 500FTC
NSGminer v0.9.0 (NeoScrypt GPU miner) is available, see the OP. Over 2x performance of the current SGminer.
HD7990 (two Tahiti GPUs, downvolted and downclocked to 850MHz core / 1250MHz memory) delivers 680KH/s for me.
R9 280X (unlucky one with Elpida memory, 1050MHz core / 1600MHz memory) = 400KH/s
HD6970 = 120KH/s, HD5870 = 100KH/s
Happy New Year!
HD7990 (two Tahiti GPUs, downvolted and downclocked to 850MHz core / 1250MHz memory) delivers 680KH/s for me.
R9 280X (unlucky one with Elpida memory, 1050MHz core / 1600MHz memory) = 400KH/s
HD6970 = 120KH/s, HD5870 = 100KH/s
Happy New Year!
NeoScrypt CPUminer v2.4.2 is ready, see the OP. Up to 10% performance increase.
KSHAKE320 vs NeoScrypt ,which algo consume more eletricity power?? 
Within next few days I will do proper testing. I am just looking for a hot algo as my miners are turned into electrical heaters by the wintertime, so I hope neoscrypt will be hot enough.
If i dont ramp up fan speeds i get high temps on my radeons with x11, (2) 7950's keep my room more than warm
Cheers
SGT
KSHAKE320 vs NeoScrypt ,which algo consume more eletricity power??
Within next few days I will do proper testing. I am just looking for a hot algo as my miners are turned into electrical heaters by the wintertime, so I hope neoscrypt will be hot enough.
KSHAKE320 vs NeoScrypt ,which algo consume more eletricity power??
You tell us. NeoScrypt is more about security than power consumption. I prefer BLAKE2 to Keccak though.
Quote
Stop using --no-submit-stale, it's like burning money.
Why you say so?
Because it is - SGMiner can't know for a fact a share is stale, and you lose nothing by submitting it. By not submitting it, you are dropping some valid shares.
KSHAKE320 vs NeoScrypt ,which algo consume more eletricity power??
I use many. Performance profiling has been done on Core 2. Older processors aren't of much use for mining, The fastest I have is a Xeon X5660 3.2GHz (6 cores, HT). SSE2 4-way produces 4KH/s in a single thread or 30KH/s in 12 threads. It was 25KH/s before.
NeoScrypt CPUminer v2.4.1 released, see the OP.
20% to 50% performance improvement over the previous release depending on CPU and engine.
20% to 50% performance improvement over the previous release depending on CPU and engine.
Code:
NeoScrypt CPUminer v2.4.1
Usage: minerd [OPTIONS]
Options:
-a, --algo=ALGO specify the algorithm to use
neoscrypt NeoScrypt(128, 2, 1) with Salsa20/20 and ChaCha20/20 (default)
altscrypt Scrypt(1024, 1, 1) with Salsa20/8 through NeoScrypt
scrypt Scrypt(1024, 1, 1) with Salsa20/8
sha256d SHA-256d
-e, --engine=N choose a NeoScrypt hashing engine
0 integer (default)
1 SSE2
2 SSE2 4-way
What is the hash rate for a specific CPU you use?
Hey guys can I get some help here with my bat file?
This is the system:
- AMD FX6300
- 16GB DDR3 1600
- AMD R9 280X VAPOR-X TRI-X OC (stock 1100,1500)
And this is what I got so far, some HW errors and no accepted shares
This is the system:
- AMD FX6300
- 16GB DDR3 1600
- AMD R9 280X VAPOR-X TRI-X OC (stock 1100,1500)
And this is what I got so far, some HW errors and no accepted shares
Best I got so far
Hello any help?¿¿
sgminer-5-dev-neoscrypt-windows-new2. --xintensity 3 -w 64 -g 4
Stop using --no-submit-stale, it's like burning money.
NeoScrypt CPUminer v2.4.1 released, see the OP.
20% to 50% performance improvement over the previous release depending on CPU and engine.
20% to 50% performance improvement over the previous release depending on CPU and engine.
Code:
NeoScrypt CPUminer v2.4.1
Usage: minerd [OPTIONS]
Options:
-a, --algo=ALGO specify the algorithm to use
neoscrypt NeoScrypt(128, 2, 1) with Salsa20/20 and ChaCha20/20 (default)
altscrypt Scrypt(1024, 1, 1) with Salsa20/8 through NeoScrypt
scrypt Scrypt(1024, 1, 1) with Salsa20/8
sha256d SHA-256d
-e, --engine=N choose a NeoScrypt hashing engine
0 integer (default)
1 SSE2
2 SSE2 4-way
Quote
Stop using --no-submit-stale, it's like burning money.
Why you say so?
Hey guys can I get some help here with my bat file?
This is the system:
- AMD FX6300
- 16GB DDR3 1600
- AMD R9 280X VAPOR-X TRI-X OC (stock 1100,1500)
And this is what I got so far, some HW errors and no accepted shares
This is the system:
- AMD FX6300
- 16GB DDR3 1600
- AMD R9 280X VAPOR-X TRI-X OC (stock 1100,1500)
And this is what I got so far, some HW errors and no accepted shares
Best I got so far
Hello any help?¿¿
I am not sure if this is the case but I got ride of HW Errors when changed fglrx driver 14.9 to 14.6 beta.
Jump to: