Pages:
Author

Topic: NSGminer v0.9.4: The Fastest NeoScrypt GPU Miner - page 28. (Read 221582 times)

hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
sgminer shuts, this is my bat file now

sgminer -o stratum+tcp://am01.eu.trademybit.com:8880 -u petazetas.neo -p x --xintensity 3  -w 64 -g 4

Try -g 2.

My card is Hynix and im just able to pull 265 stable with I13 w64 g2 1100/1500

Try --xintensity 3  -w 64 -g 2 and Catalyst 14.6 driver.

So 14.6 are best? I downgraded to 14.4 Undecided

And why dows xintensity work better than I13?

Yes, 14.6 is best, it is similar to 14.7. No idea about why xintensity = 3 is better.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
sgminer shuts, this is my bat file now

sgminer -o stratum+tcp://am01.eu.trademybit.com:8880 -u petazetas.neo -p x --xintensity 3  -w 64 -g 4

Try -g 2.

My card is Hynix and im just able to pull 265 stable with I13 w64 g2 1100/1500

Try --xintensity 3  -w 64 -g 2 and Catalyst 14.6 driver.

So 14.6 are best? I downgraded to 14.4 Undecided

And why dows xintensity work better than I13?
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
sgminer shuts, this is my bat file now

sgminer -o stratum+tcp://am01.eu.trademybit.com:8880 -u petazetas.neo -p x --xintensity 3  -w 64 -g 4

Try -g 2.

My card is Hynix and im just able to pull 265 stable with I13 w64 g2 1100/1500

Try --xintensity 3  -w 64 -g 2 and Catalyst 14.6 driver.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
sgminer shuts, this is my bat file now

sgminer -o stratum+tcp://am01.eu.trademybit.com:8880 -u petazetas.neo -p x --xintensity 3  -w 64 -g 4

Try -g 2.

My card is Hynix and im just able to pull 265 stable with I13 w64 g2 1100/1500
hero member
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
sgminer shuts, this is my bat file now

sgminer -o stratum+tcp://am01.eu.trademybit.com:8880 -u petazetas.neo -p x --xintensity 3  -w 64 -g 4

Try -g 2.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
sgminer shuts, this is my bat file now

sgminer -o stratum+tcp://am01.eu.trademybit.com:8880 -u petazetas.neo -p x --xintensity 3  -w 64 -g 4
member
Activity: 81
Merit: 1002
It was only the wind.
isnt scrypt algo will be well done with hardware ?

Not exactly sure what you ask.
Anyway, Neoscrypt is technicaly superior to scrypt in all aspects (security, speed, temperature...) at CPU/GPU domain of course...

i mean, to get big gain in scrypt algo, only using hardware than software ?

In scrypt, yes, but not neoscrypt - no one has hardware for neoscrypt yet.
newbie
Activity: 69
Merit: 0
Hey guys can I get some help here with my bat file?

This is the system:

- AMD FX6300
- 16GB DDR3 1600
- AMD R9 280X VAPOR-X TRI-X OC (stock 1100,1500)

And this is what I got so far, some HW errors and no accepted shares Sad

http://i.imgur.com/Me07dl2.png?1

Best I got so far

http://i.imgur.com/wjOOWXQ.png?1

Hello any help?¿¿
 




      sgminer-5-dev-neoscrypt-windows-new2.     --xintensity 3  -w 64 -g 4

hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Hey guys can I get some help here with my bat file?

This is the system:

- AMD FX6300
- 16GB DDR3 1600
- AMD R9 280X VAPOR-X TRI-X OC (stock 1100,1500)

And this is what I got so far, some HW errors and no accepted shares Sad



Best I got so far



Hello any help?¿¿
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Hey guys can I get some help here with my bat file?

This is the system:

- AMD FX6300
- 16GB DDR3 1600
- AMD R9 280X VAPOR-X TRI-X OC (stock 1100,1500)

And this is what I got so far, some HW errors and no accepted shares Sad



Best I got so far

hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
Hey guys can I get some help here with my bat file?

This is the system:

- AMD FX6300
- 16GB DDR3 1600
- AMD R9 280X VAPOR-X TRI-X OC (stock 1100,1500)

And this is what I got so far, some HW errors and no accepted shares Sad

newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
isnt scrypt algo will be well done with hardware ?

Not exactly sure what you ask.
Anyway, Neoscrypt is technicaly superior to scrypt in all aspects (security, speed, temperature...) at CPU/GPU domain of course...

i mean, to get big gain in scrypt algo, only using hardware than software ?
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
SGminer should define it as WORKSIZE. If even this fails, try a safe way.

Perfect.  Changing to WORKSIZE did fix the problem - but the GPUs were going sick/dead very quickly.  I ended up having to run with i12 -- i13 or above and the gpus get unhappy.

Quote
In addition, don't try to set thread concurrency to anything other than power of 2, i.e. 1024, 2048, 4096... It will only produce HW errors otherwise.

Oh, okay.  I set tc4096 while doing the above -

legendary
Activity: 1239
Merit: 1020
No surrender, no retreat, no regret.
HD6970: 19.5KH/s to 50.5KH/s and no HW errors!

hmm - i replaced my neoscrypt.cl with yours then deleted my bin file.  when sgminer goes to recreate it:
Quote
[01:20:47] Building binary neoscryptCaymangw128l8tc7000.bin
[01:20:47] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
 [01:20:47] "/tmp/OCL18375T14.cl", line 596: error: identifier "WORKGROUPSIZE" is undefined
  __kernel __attribute__((reqd_work_group_size(WORKGROUPSIZE, 1, 1)))
                                               ^

1 error detected in the compilation of "/tmp/OCL18375T14.cl".

Frontend phase failed compilation.

any idea what i've done wrong?  not sure if 'workgroupsize' has anything to do with 'worksize' but ive tried it at 128, 256, and undefined.

SGminer should define it as WORKSIZE. If even this fails, try a safe way.

Replace the following in the kernel:
Code:
/* NeoScrypt core engine:
 * N = 128, r = 2, p = 1, salt = password */
__kernel __attribute__((vec_type_hint(uint4)))
__kernel __attribute__((reqd_work_group_size(WORKGROUPSIZE, 1, 1)))
__kernel void search(__global const uint4* restrict password,
  volatile __global uint* restrict output, __global uint16* globalcache,
  const uint target) {
    uint glbid = get_global_id(0);
    uint grpid = get_group_id(0);
    uint lsize = WORKGROUPSIZE;
    uint lclid = glbid & (WORKGROUPSIZE - 1);

    __global uint16 *G = &globalcache[(grpid * WORKGROUPSIZE) << 9];

with this:
Code:
/* NeoScrypt core engine:
 * N = 128, r = 2, p = 1, salt = password */
__kernel __attribute__((vec_type_hint(uint4)))
__kernel void search(__global const uint4* restrict password,
  volatile __global uint* restrict output, __global uint16* globalcache,
  const uint target) {
    uint glbid = get_global_id(0);
    uint grpid = get_group_id(0);
    uint lsize = get_local_size(0);
    uint lclid = glbid & (lsize - 1);

    __global uint16 *G = &globalcache[(grpid * lsize) << 9];

It's going to reduce performance by about 1% though.

In addition, don't try to set thread concurrency to anything other than power of 2, i.e. 1024, 2048, 4096... It will only produce HW errors otherwise.
legendary
Activity: 1354
Merit: 1020
I was diagnosed with brain parasite
isnt scrypt algo will be well done with hardware ?

Not exactly sure what you ask.
Anyway, Neoscrypt is technicaly superior to scrypt in all aspects (security, speed, temperature...) at CPU/GPU domain of course...
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
isnt scrypt algo will be well done with hardware ?
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
HD6970: 19.5KH/s to 50.5KH/s and no HW errors!

hmm - i replaced my neoscrypt.cl with yours then deleted my bin file.  when sgminer goes to recreate it:
Quote
[01:20:47] Building binary neoscryptCaymangw128l8tc7000.bin
[01:20:47] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
 [01:20:47] "/tmp/OCL18375T14.cl", line 596: error: identifier "WORKGROUPSIZE" is undefined
  __kernel __attribute__((reqd_work_group_size(WORKGROUPSIZE, 1, 1)))
                                               ^

1 error detected in the compilation of "/tmp/OCL18375T14.cl".

Frontend phase failed compilation.

any idea what i've done wrong?  not sure if 'workgroupsize' has anything to do with 'worksize' but ive tried it at 128, 256, and undefined.
legendary
Activity: 1239
Merit: 1020
No surrender, no retreat, no regret.
neoscrypt_vliw.cl v3

HD6970: 19.5KH/s to 50.5KH/s and no HW errors!

Thanks to a much better global memory management with burst writes. Also tried a trick with copying a workgroup buffer to local memory and writing back asynchronously to global memory through async_work_group_copy(), but it didn't work out (36KH/s and 15% of HW errors). A 2.5x speed increase is something to celebrate anyway. Anyone cares to donate towards drinks, whores and blackjack? Wink
legendary
Activity: 1059
Merit: 1000
With a dual processor intel xeon e5 2680v2 @ 2.80 GHz (20c 40t), I can get a good result? Grin

I'm undecided at which cryptocurrencies can i mine! (Pts, gap, xpt, mmc, riecoin, yac ...)

I can suggest PXC or FTC.

thanks!  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1354
Merit: 1020
I was diagnosed with brain parasite
With a dual processor intel xeon e5 2680v2 @ 2.80 GHz (20c 40t), I can get a good result? Grin

I'm undecided at which cryptocurrencies can i mine! (Pts, gap, xpt, mmc, riecoin, yac ...)

I can suggest PXC or FTC.
Pages:
Jump to: