Topic: nvK c0inkite c0ldacrd is Anti-OpenSource nutcase (Read 497 times)

I want to give you the benefit of the doubt.  I'm not an emotional guy, and if I owe you an apology I want own my to mistake and make amends.  What OS and browser are you using?


He's not intentionally damaging other companies, he's merely protecting his intellectual property.  That's a totally normal thing to do in every industry.  Just because bitcoin itself is open source doesn't mean that every hardware manufacturer has to give away his intellectual property.

Imagine a world where everything you worked for was open to anyone to take and profit from.  There would be no incentive to invent and innovate.

I didn't throw any ''fit'' about it, I said the truth and I never heard about BPIP extension making a mistake, all I know is that I didn't alter anything and I am not lying.

Here I just did it again with one of the feedback from your profile, using the same thing:

Sure it does.
He is selling his shit and he is not being honest about it, while he is damaging other competitions, so I don't trust him buying anything from him.
Selling = Trading.

You're the one who posted an altered link. You could have just changed it to the actual reference link after finding out it was wrong instead of throwing a fit about it. Something like, "Hey, thanks for pointing that out, BPIP made an error so I fixed the link" would have been nice.


It is not, at all. How does that action make someone untrustworthy for the purposes of trading? It seems like you don't have a grasp of what trust ratings are supposed to be used for, or else you are letting your emotions override your common sense.

Dude, please READ what I wrote above.
I AM NOT ALTERING ANYTHING, all I did was clicking a button via BPIP extension.
I guess it's not that hard to understand to any inteligent person, or I have to draw it for you and record process video  

Service cease and desist, shutting down github page of open source project just because name trademark sounds similar, is more than enough.
Attacking other open source projects, and multiple lies that your project is open source (when it's not) is also more than enough.

He does seem very invested based on the emotional responses. Simple(est) solution is to rebrand reword and repurpose. Seems the cnd was about it being a copied patented product. See the switch and steam deck looked the same but Nintendo couldn't sue them due to them being entirely different products. Same purpose yes, different means of delivery though. Btclock and block clock are similar products shit they even kinda look the same.


NVK response

I gotta say I agree with his paradigm.

This post

Not exactly an ANN thread, but I had the impression that he was behind the project. I'd appreciate it if someone clarified the details (as now I recall reading somewhere that this BTCclock build is produced by someone else).

Clean and sober, unfortunately.


Freedom of speech.


Is that your only way to cope?  People are capable of having options that differ from yours without having ulterior motives.  Your opinions aren't infallible, get over it.


Ouch!  You hurt my feeling.


I've always been crazy, but it's kept me from going insane.
 - Waylon Jennings


Just to give you the benefit of the doubt, I did a little test.  I figured it could have been a bug with the BPIP extension, but every time the quote included the correct reference link.  I'm still open to you proving me wrong, but so far all the evidence suggests you purposefully edited the link.  Prove me wrong, and you'll have my sincere apology.

You have once again altered the reference link.

Check the link on the trust page versus the link you have posted in the quote.

This is what it should be:

Reference

This is what you have posted:

Reference

Do you still guess I am wrong?  


Not a fitting reason to leave a negative trust by any stretch of imagination.

I don't know on what drugs you are, and what gives you the right to insult and accuse me, but I guess you are in the same camp with nvK.
Welcome to my ignore list, and I wish you good mental health in future.

Changed what exactly?
All I did is copy-pasted link from nvK profile trust page via BPIP extension.
Here I will do it again:




If this is me ''changing'' anything than I guess you are wrong.

---

Back on topic with nvK.
Let me just remind everyone that he also attacked another great open source project Seedsigner.
As if they are creating more and more open source enemies every day

What ANN post?  Do you mean the thread in Project Development, or is there another ANN thread?  Is dkbit98 selling these kits himself?  I was unaware of that, but BIG if true.

To be clear, I'm not taking any sides here.


The exact license is here.

It's an MIT license with an anti-sell clause:


I'll admit, I've never heard of the BTCclock before. And I haven't found the original repo so it might have a different license. But it looks like @dkbit98 is reselling it according to the ANN post? So that would not be allowed under this license.

But I guess you can simply re-upload to a Gitea server somewhere that can't be taken down, or host your own, and then not sell it but just provide the repo for free access and then you'd be compliant with the license.

I didn't spend a lot of time researching it either, but if Github shutdown the BTCClock repository, it's likely because they found significant similarities between that code and BlockClock's code.  Enough so that it violated the licensing.


I assume this question is directed at me (you quoted uncle nutildah.)  The reason might be found in my review the thread.  Not so much because I gave the ColdCard good marks in my thorough and unbiased review, but because of how unhinged dkbit98 became as he derails it to attack nvK.

Its been known to happen




Edit: Just to add something constructive, its not really a good idea to leave red trust for the crime of "killing open sourced software", because its not really indicative of trustworthiness (whether they manufactured a product that can be trusted).

I have no dog in this fight, so my question is asked innocently here:  could he have somehow done that by mistake?  Whatever you might say about dkbit98, he isn't stupid and I'd certainly think he'd have enough forum savvy to know that changing a reference link (for whatever reason) would be picked up on and also that it'd be a black mark against him for doing so. 

And is there anything for him to gain from doing that, aside from concealing your link to the ColdCard Mk4 review? 

I'd no idea there was this drama going on, and I don't think I've ever seen dkbit98 gangbanged like this before.  IMO his position does seem just a wee bit extreme, and for what it's worth (likely nothing) I'm finding his arguments to be much weaker than everyone else's; I wouldn't be convinced to boycott the ColdCard or any other product based on the "anti-open source" accusation as it's presented here.  Anyway, popcorn is a-popping.

Sorry, but i don't get your point. Those X/Twitter link doesn't mention anything about violation of Common Clause. And AFAIK BTCClock doesn't re-use BlockClock's code, but i can't verify it since BTCClock's GitHub no longer exist and i don't have copy of BTCClock repository.

P.S. I'm not logged in to X, so i didn't read any reply or mention.


Fair enough, without sufficient knowledge some people would assume anti open source equal pro closed source.

He actually changed your reference link in the quote to this thread. That's not a very honest honest practice now is it.

I don't care about this dispute either way but altering a reference link suggests a screw is loose somewhere in the head region.

Lol, you are a malicious, sneaky piece of shit, you know that?  If you're going to quote my review, and accuse me of being linked to someone for whom I've left a positive, at least have the balls to leave my REAL reference link intact.  Or, are you such a coward that you don't want anyone to notice how you derailed my review of the ColdCard?

For those of you who care, here's the actual reference I left along with nvK's review: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/coinkite-coldcard-mk4-review-5405919

The OP includes two links; one to nvK's profile and another to his own review of the "open source" (I'll get to that in a minute) blockclock.  No mention of the cease and desist without me digging, and still no proof other than the claims of someone who's trying to profit off nvK's code.  If this thread is really about the cease and desist, why didn't dkbit98 provide a link directly Mitchell's post?  Could it be because he's merit hunting like usual?


Common Clause allows anyone to download and use the code, a true "DIY" project wouldn't be restricted from using the code.  What the licensing doesn't allow is someone to sell kits that require the code.  That's a direct violation of the licensing.  The licensing chosen by Coinkite is there business and their business alone.  No one is putting a gun to your head and forcing you to buy their product.  In fact, you could build your own ColdCard and use nvK's code to operate it.  You just can't sell them.


Note the post right below the OP.  There are many on this forum who aren't proficient in English and haven't learned to read between dkbit98's lines.  He has been spreading fear and misinformation about ColdCard for years by using phrases like "anti-open-source."  He won't correct anyone who then refers to them as "closed-source" because his beef with nvK is more important than facts.

---

I'm not, but so what if I was?  Are you going to also give me a red-tag based on your biases and lack of understanding?  One of us based our review on experience with his products and the other based it on butthurt.  I'll leave it to the community to determine which is more helpful.

But let me ask you a question; how have you contributed to bitcoin?  Making a bunch of comparison threads on the forum?  No matter how much merit you earn here, nvK has done more for the growth of bitcoin than you could ever dream.  Your dogmatic view of "open source" as some holey grail, and opinion that all participants need to strictly adhere to your religion only demonstrates your lack of technical knowledge and a lack of understanding of how businesses are operated.

If your eyes are working correctly you can clearly see the link I posted and there you have links with confirmation.
I am not trying to convince you in anything, but if you want to support this asshole and his crap products than go ahead, it's your life and I don't care.
And you giving him positive feedback now is making me think that you are connected with him in some way.

Because he is a nutcase, and his code is not open source.
Nobody should be crazy enough to trust this asshole after this latest anti-os stunt.
This BTCclock was not using his code or any of his crap at all.

---

Just a few examples of nvk LIES and deceptions:

Clearly deceiving to everyone for months that his crapware is open source when it's not:



Blatant lie that his crapware is one and only airgapped device that is not connected to computer.


https://web.archive.org/web/20240731203008/https://coldcard.com/

Luckily, internet remembers and archives stuff, so do I.

One of post on thread mentioned by OP mention the source.

---

I mostly agree with you. They still create decent hardware wallet and common clause isn't exactly crap license, although OP never say "closed source".