Cassius: there is something already: http://nxtcoin.blogspot.cz/2014/01/nxt-distribution-infographics.html
+
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BwAGADgnQcrtM3g1cU1VSHZtTGM/edit
Topic: | Nxt | Blockchain Platform | Proof of Stake | Official - page 511. (Read 941427 times)
Coins Source updated the NXT page, and the score jumped .3 points.
We'd appreciate it if you guys overlook the post and possibly let us know which NXT logo you want on our page.
http://www.coinssource.com/crypto-coins/nxt/
We'd appreciate it if you guys overlook the post and possibly let us know which NXT logo you want on our page.
http://www.coinssource.com/crypto-coins/nxt/
This is great, though there seem to be one or two inaccuracies or odd sentences.
I think one of the biggest problems is that NXT is perceived as a challenger to bitcoin and therefore is a threat to die-hard bitcoiners. In fact, the Asset Exchange could be a huge benefit to all cryptocurrencies since it can function as a decentralised exchange. (Side point: I guess it would even be possible to come up with futures contracts, so that you could be sure your $100 of bitcoin/NXT/whatevercoin was worth $100 when you sold it for something else. That would be a huge step forward as it would avoid the need for centralised exchanges right up to the point of cashing out.)
It would also be good to get some simple charts of NXT distribution, compared to bitcoin and one or two others. That would pre-empt a lot of criticism.
Price is looking healthy guys broke through 5k on bter as expected yesterday
I just posted this in response to criticism of Nxt's distribution in the investigation of instamines thread (criticism from others, not the author) I now it is re-raking over old ground but I couldn't help myself 
There were 6 weeks to join the IPO for Nxt and coins* were distributed on a proportion of how much BTC you gave. This was also capped at a maximum of 1 BTC. i.e. if you gave 0.1% of funds collected you got 0.1% of the coins, 5% of what was collected you get 5% of the coins.
Only 100 or so people came forward in 6 weeks and then only 73 of those claimed the coins that they were entitled to. They understood, as the first POS, that nobody would join them if they hoarded their coins so there was an orgy of bounties, selling and giveaways. When comparing POS coins, perhaps this period should be judged as the distribution phase? As the nature of pure POS requires all coins to be created at once. If there were only 73 holders now then Nxt wouldn't be valued at 10s of millions of dollars.
The tech was then released and this is what gave the coin its value when people understood what was being built. It also has provided the funds to build, arguably, the most advanced cryptographic platform devised so far (I won't go into details to avoid looking like advertising but start another thread and we can discuss it there).
Finally, the initial distribution is moot as the distribution between accounts now is better than bitcoin's and improving slowly all the time, all achieved in a few months. I can dig out the links if the auther would like to see them.
I for one would welcome the author's inclusion of Nxt for all to see, as I think you would be surprised that it would come out the other side with a good overall report. Though comparison should be to Ripple, Counterparty and Mastercoin as you would comparing apples with oranges. These are also striving to beyond being solely a currency.
*(these are not generally referred to as coins as this limits what Nxt actually is peoples minds, they are considered tokens for the Nxt Crypto Platform's features)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=587086.60
Are you like, deliberately excluding the worst distributed coin of all, NXT?
Theres no excuse pal, it is up there on the high market cap list.
Here you go: NXT coin-100 % insta pre mine shared by 70 early adopters.
Theres no excuse pal, it is up there on the high market cap list.
Here you go: NXT coin-100 % insta pre mine shared by 70 early adopters.
There were 6 weeks to join the IPO for Nxt and coins* were distributed on a proportion of how much BTC you gave. This was also capped at a maximum of 1 BTC. i.e. if you gave 0.1% of funds collected you got 0.1% of the coins, 5% of what was collected you get 5% of the coins.
Only 100 or so people came forward in 6 weeks and then only 73 of those claimed the coins that they were entitled to. They understood, as the first POS, that nobody would join them if they hoarded their coins so there was an orgy of bounties, selling and giveaways. When comparing POS coins, perhaps this period should be judged as the distribution phase? As the nature of pure POS requires all coins to be created at once. If there were only 73 holders now then Nxt wouldn't be valued at 10s of millions of dollars.
The tech was then released and this is what gave the coin its value when people understood what was being built. It also has provided the funds to build, arguably, the most advanced cryptographic platform devised so far (I won't go into details to avoid looking like advertising but start another thread and we can discuss it there).
Finally, the initial distribution is moot as the distribution between accounts now is better than bitcoin's and improving slowly all the time, all achieved in a few months. I can dig out the links if the auther would like to see them.
I for one would welcome the author's inclusion of Nxt for all to see, as I think you would be surprised that it would come out the other side with a good overall report. Though comparison should be to Ripple, Counterparty and Mastercoin as you would comparing apples with oranges. These are also striving to beyond being solely a currency.
*(these are not generally referred to as coins as this limits what Nxt actually is peoples minds, they are considered tokens for the Nxt Crypto Platform's features)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=587086.60
Coins Source updated the NXT page, and the score jumped .3 points.
We'd appreciate it if you guys overlook the post and possibly let us know which NXT logo you want on our page.
http://www.coinssource.com/crypto-coins/nxt/
We'd appreciate it if you guys overlook the post and possibly let us know which NXT logo you want on our page.
http://www.coinssource.com/crypto-coins/nxt/
wow i love the new wallet!
The article about Nxt is back online: http://www.coinssource.com/nxt-crypto-platform-version-1-0-0-released/
Please share!
Please share!
I like this. Well done, salsacz!
If you guys haven't, please show your support for Nxt
https://nxtforum.org/nxt-promotion/getting-merchants-to-accept-nxt-starts-here/
https://nxtforum.org/nxt-promotion/getting-merchants-to-accept-nxt-starts-here/
The article about Nxt is back online: http://www.coinssource.com/nxt-crypto-platform-version-1-0-0-released/
Please share!
Please share!
Great article.
The article about Nxt is back online: http://www.coinssource.com/nxt-crypto-platform-version-1-0-0-released/
Please share!
Please share!
Please add comments!
The article about Nxt is back online: http://www.coinssource.com/nxt-crypto-platform-version-1-0-0-released/
Please share!
Please share!
i suppose ill go ahead and subscribe to this thread.
May I ask a question? Where can I "subscribe"?
i suppose ill go ahead and subscribe to this thread.
Creating client diversity is important.
Quoting out of context but...
ChuckOne agrees and he is right!
half our clients are women 
Yes. One suggestion: do not end the music so abruptly when the video ends. Make it more smooth.
yes, i agree
I was going to say the same. This is my favourite one yet tho
Also, on the no leaders, no kings and then all the little men popping up in a row... it might be almost accurate of this forum but still make every other one a little lady popping up!
and add 'or queens' or something too 
don't forget the ladies NODE PROVIDERS: HARD FORK IMMINENT AT BLOCK 130K. PLEASE, UPDATE TO V1.0.0 ASAP.
USERS: If you know node providers, please inform them.
USERS: If you know node providers, please inform them.
Nice - I like it.
Well, I see you are developing.
Well done. Maybe, you could have different version of that video specific to the audience using different "What if"s in a different order.
I like the overall idea. Maybe. But original picture had much text too
http://photos.appleinsider.com/gallery/9023-486-EarthDay_Newspaper_Ad_4914-V2-o.png
http://photos.appleinsider.com/gallery/9023-486-EarthDay_Newspaper_Ad_4914-V2-o.png
I see.
However, simpler is better still holds. Since it is based on existing graphic, after its creator's response we can simply follow all places, where was published original one and use them or similar sites. Thunderclap campaign could help too
Nice!
All I need is NXT.
Jump to: