Yes I think it is a ggod idea that someone who got a few next from a faucet should have a bigger return on their investment than someone who has risked hundreds of BTC.
NOT
ok and answer me this... how many people would you need forging if the whole world wer using nxt. i mean billions of ppl... iv given up forging cos its just not worth it. the more the distribution gets better the fewer very wealthy accounts there are.. to make forging worth wile you need a fairly decent amount.. 10k coins just duznt cut it. what happens when there is only a handfull of rich ppl forging and billions of ppl using it. to many transactions and too few forgers. fail. regular ppl will not forge unless its worth there time. its guna get to the stage where theres just not enough forgers to process tx's. if you want a fair system.. with out monetary greed getting a grip.. yes.. give the ppl with the smallest amount the highest fees. you will have by FAR the best distribution. it will encourage new comers that are afraid of putting money in because they will be able to put 10 euro in and make a nice profit..(not much for a tenner but very high percentage.) at the end of the day all its doing is taking away the incentive to hoard millions in one account. increasing distribution and then maintaining it. millions of new ppl will be forging. the system may be able to do 1000tps but you need the forgers to do it. and enough of them. taking from EVERYONE not just the rich (tx fees) and giving to the poor. the true robbin hood of crypto. you want nxt to go global. get the 99 percent on board... the 1 percent will be forced to follow! think of the media hype you would get over it. eventually it will level out and most accounts will be getting the same amount of fees. and il say again who cares if the rich split there accounts... the numbers will say distribution is evenly spread.. no hefty whales "waiting to dump" putting fear on the market!!!
This won't work. It will just give incentive to whales to distribute their money on more accounts. This doesn't help as they won't get more bandwidth, they will just run the client multiple times.
I think a good solution could use transparent forging to determine not the next one account to forge a block, but determine which next ten (or X) accounts would forge under current conditions and split the rewards between those accounts according to their contribution.