I am not talking about anonymous corporation which sound very futuristic and ultimately a very dubious concept, imho. I am talking about proper public companies with owners and shareholders. I talk about U.S law because you are more familiar with it but the principle should apply globally.
If we are talking about "proper public companies" then I don't see any reason why they wouldn't just stick to stock exchanges - there is nothing for them to gain but a bad reputation if they start listing on P2P Exchanges IMO.
BTW - I am not a US citizen so its laws are actually not well known to me at all.
Now talk about US in specifics, fundraising law is changing as we speak now. I have a big plan regarding this area and a model that could eventually surpass AngelList. In some countries, the process would even much easier. In some countries are harder. But in general the process to revolutionize the concept of fundrasing and stock exchage is pretty much parallel to process that Bitcoin revolutionize the concept of currency and payment.
I don't agree - the advantage that a P2P Exchange has is simply allowing anonymity. Any decent public company doesn't need that and so doesn't need P2P and the "bad rep" that comes with it.
A "revolution" would be a company whose rules work entirely upon "math" and therefore "don't need" laws or lawyers. We may see that down the track but I don't think that Nxt Asset Exchange has been created with this in mind (nor what is being developed in at least most other similar projects).
