Can you please go discuss with FC in his own NEX thread.
It's locked.
Surprising. Such a nice chap.
Fc can you dedicate yourself a new thread?
Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1213. (Read 2761624 times)
It's locked.
Surprising. Such a nice chap.
Fc can you dedicate yourself a new thread?
Can you please go discuss with FC in his own NEX thread.
It's locked.
What's the current status? I dropped out the other day because I needed some sleep.
I'm thinking how to "convert" Qubic mixing into Nxt one.
@Come-from-Beyond
Any news relating the mixing feature?
Any news relating the mixing feature?
No news.
It's good news, right?
Depends.
If we have a solution, it's good. If we don't, then it isn't.
What's the current status? I dropped out the other day because I needed some sleep.
Here's the dev thread for integrating ZeroCoin/ZeroCash in top of Nxt using AM.
https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/viewtopic.php?f=38&t=701
There was also discussion on it in this thread over the past day or two.
Can you please go discuss with FC in his own NEX thread.
Well, I would like to know how Nxt handles a fork. That's what I'm trying to understand here.
I don't see u trying.
I don't see you with an explanation.
I don't see how you are handling the current Nxt fork that is happening right now.
WHAT FORK IS HAPPENING NOW? U MAD?
fork that was mentioned in this thread happens to people using OLD version of NRS?
Are you really that ignorant or do you just want to spread chaos and misinformation?
Well, I would like to know how Nxt handles a fork. That's what I'm trying to understand here.
I don't see u trying.
I don't see you with an explanation.
I don't see how you are handling the current Nxt fork that is happening right now.
@Come-from-Beyond
Any news relating the mixing feature?
Any news relating the mixing feature?
No news.
It's good news, right?
Depends.
If we have a solution, it's good. If we don't, then it isn't.
What's the current status? I dropped out the other day because I needed some sleep.
Well, I would like to know how Nxt handles a fork. That's what I'm trying to understand here.
I don't see u trying.
Are you brain dead.... the block chain is a global ledger!
In short, if you got a fork, you got an inconsistent ledger or in other words and inconsistend database.
In short, if you got a fork, you got an inconsistent ledger or in other words and inconsistend database.
It's interesting, do u really believe that u r right?
Well, I would like to know how Nxt handles a fork. That's what I'm trying to understand here.
Actually, I want to know if Nxt is a worthless piece of junk or something that is worth building on top of. So far, it looks like the former, until I can get a better explanation from someone.
So you are saying that it can maintain availability (which I agree) and survive partitioning ( which I don't think so).
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
U confuse partitioning of network with partitioning of data storage.
Nxt has very high Availability coz all the data is stored in the blockchain. The blockchain can't be partitioned, that's why Partition tolerance issue doesn't arise at all.
Partition tolerance is important for other data storage schemes, for example, DHT.
Are you brain dead.... the block chain is a global ledger!
In short, if you got a fork, you got an inconsistent ledger or in other words and inconsistend database.
It will survive it...
Ok, It actually won't survive partition, if some government decides to cut off
"teh internetz" (i.e. think of Great Firewall of China)
Then folks on behind that firewall will obviously end-up on a fork
(but there's no coin that would solve that)
Are you brain dead.... the block chain is a global ledger!
In short, if you got a fork, you got an inconsistent ledger or in other words and inconsistend database.
In short, if you got a fork, you got an inconsistent ledger or in other words and inconsistend database.
It's interesting, do u really believe that u r right?
@Come-from-Beyond
Any news relating the mixing feature?
Any news relating the mixing feature?
No news.
It's good news, right?
So you are saying that it can maintain availability (which I agree) and survive partitioning ( which I don't think so).
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
U confuse partitioning of network with partitioning of data storage.
Nxt has very high Availability coz all the data is stored in the blockchain. The blockchain can't be partitioned, that's why Partition tolerance issue doesn't arise at all.
Partition tolerance is important for other data storage schemes, for example, DHT.
Are you brain dead.... the block chain is a global ledger!
In short, if you got a fork, you got an inconsistent ledger or in other words and inconsistend database.
So you are saying that it can maintain availability (which I agree) and survive partitioning ( which I don't think so).
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
You'll find the answer to that question in the source... (yes even the published flawed one)
If you don't know the answer, then don't pretend the answer is somewhere else.
Stating assumptions as truth. That's another one.
Edit: sorry, smaragda
So you are saying that it can maintain availability (which I agree) and survive partitioning ( which I don't think so).
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
U confuse partitioning of network with partitioning of data storage.
Nxt has very high Availability coz all the data is stored in the blockchain. The blockchain can't be partitioned, that's why Partition tolerance issue doesn't arise at all.
Partition tolerance is important for other data storage schemes, for example, DHT.
@Come-from-Beyond
Any news relating the mixing feature?
Any news relating the mixing feature?
So you are saying that it can maintain availability (which I agree) and survive partitioning ( which I don't think so).
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
You'll find the answer to that question in the source... (yes even the published flawed one)
If you don't know the answer, then don't pretend the answer is somewhere else.
I know the answer, I could give you line numbers inside this file:
https://bitbucket.org/JeanLucPicard/nxt-public/src/4073c21098076d3469b3f74d49e73ffabe3a2001/Nxt.java?at=master
but tell me, why would I possibly want to do that?
So you are saying that it can maintain availability (which I agree) and survive partitioning ( which I don't think so).
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
You'll find the answer to that question in the source... (yes even the published flawed one)
If you don't know the answer, then don't pretend the answer is somewhere else.
I seriously doubt it. The way he coded the 'secret phrase' stuff. That was borderline pathetic.
So you are saying that it can maintain availability (which I agree) and survive partitioning ( which I don't think so).
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
What is in the algorithm for Nxt that makes it tolerant to partitioning?
If you don't think it was pathetic, then I would argue that you don't have a clue.
I guess for you, it was perfectly okay that folks lost their Nxt because they had a secret phrase of 8 digits.
I guess for you, it was perfectly okay that folks lost their Nxt because they had a secret phrase of 8 digits.
Jump to: