Why is NXT falling down?
Do you think it will reach 0,00005000 btc again ?
My guess is that it is end of January an we still don't have some sexy client. Do you think it will reach 0,00005000 btc again ?
Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1259. (Read 2761627 times)
I missed this one and I kinda hate it because I've been looking for a coin that solves a lot of the issues of Bitcoin.
Are any of the 71 original investors giving away, or are there any good faucets?
Are any of the 71 original investors giving away, or are there any good faucets?
Correct me if I am wrong, but if that is so, that even mixing with sum(in)=/=sum(out) would give my links a non-zero probability.
Right. But this greatly increases number of possible variants. It's like moving from 2048 to 4096 bit security.
do you all like it? not even started ... plenty more to come I hope i don't kill the coin 
Yes. Thanks. Dump more. 
strong demand but big seller(s) taking very large dumps.
Not large enough. I want to see single digits.
do you all like it? not even started ... plenty more to come I hope i don't kill the coin
thank you for the cheaps!
You're not listening!
I am. I'm just sleeping. I got u. I hope.
Ok, talk to you tomorrow then
Quote
"Now I go to sleep" -- CfB
do you all like it? not even started ... plenty more to come I hope i don't kill the coin
Why not zerocoin? Any unproven tech will need to be reviewed by cryptographic authority and we know that is not so easy.
I'll read Zerocoin whitepaper tomorrow and will think. Today is too late, time to drink milk and go to bed soon.
In my search for a crypto algo reviewer, I was referred to a crypto expert named Matt Green. He did get back to me yesterday and said he was currently advising Zerocoin but might have some time to review our code. I did mention to him that we were interested in implementing Zerocoin with Nxt POS and would like him to review our code if he could. Here is his blog, seems like a really nice guy; http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/
Also, I've had a hard time getting crypto people to review the code, they would rather review a protocol design document instead of code.
zerocash is scheduled to be released in May as altcoin.
I can send him a proposal with bounty offer if you would like to put some text together regarding what you want.
a sneak peak to my idea about a green Nxt video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ic_WLMPX888&feature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ic_WLMPX888&feature=youtu.be
It's cheesy, yet funny and spot on
It made me laugh, very accurate though!
good video,
some watchers may still be interested in the numbers and ask for the proofs: could there be also a link to those calculations.
Or is it better that now is only raised some questions ...
I agree, that's why NxtMyths projects start as a paper, will continue as infographics and will be completed in the video(s). I just wanted a little more fun for 2 hours
ok
Sometimes it may be better to start with the video. But, ofc it's safer to start with facts and proofs
BTW, is there any other example of some system, which takes as much electricity as Bitcoin (17 million USD / day) ?
http://qz.com/156479/miners-spend-17-million-a-day-for-a-shot-at-4-4-million-of-bitcoin/
Just wondering, how Bitcoin can justify that kind of waste ... is it really worth of 17 M ...
But in any other case, how could Big Brother possibly add your "more info" if all transaction in the past are fulfilled?
Imagine that weight of a real (weight = 100%) link between IN and OUT is 5% (that's how Big Brother sees it). U use this OUT to buy something from a website that is later seized by BB. Now he knows one of ur real IPs, this increases that link weight from 5% to 12%.
Even worse, some other guy reveals his real transactions, this automatically increases weights of all the other links involved into the same mixing session.
And the other thing: what's the issue with the 'joincoin approach'? I.e. if n senders sends 5Nxts then n receiver receives 5Nxts. So, nobody could differentiate who exactly transferred whom 5Nxt. They send collectively n*5 Nxts and they receive collectively n*5 Nxts.
"nobody could differentiate who exactly transferred whom 5Nxt" is correct, but actually some non-zero probability is enough to use approach described above to deanonymize u.
Correct me if I am wrong, but if that is so, that even mixing with sum(in)=/=sum(out) would give my links a non-zero probability.
Why is NXT falling down?
Do you think it will reach 0,00005000 btc again ?
Do you think it will reach 0,00005000 btc again ?
Maybe, we had a dip before it skyrocketed before, so don't wait to long.
Why is NXT falling down?
Do you think it will reach 0,00005000 btc again ?
Do you think it will reach 0,00005000 btc again ?
from my observation of the charts it appears to be driven from the supply side. strong demand but big seller(s) taking very large dumps.
Why is NXT falling down?
Do you think it will reach 0,00005000 btc again ?
Do you think it will reach 0,00005000 btc again ?
You're not listening!
I am. I'm just sleeping. I got u. I hope.
Signature would be invalidated in case of corruption.
You're not listening! Forget about transaction signing, I understood already long time ago what you're trying to say.
This is another issue:
- client calls getTransaction
- core returns sender address
- something goes wrong and client receives a corrupted address
- user decides to send money to that address and loses money
If that would be the new address, it would be protected from corruption.
We have a chance to add extra protection, why not do it?
Maybe this: 1LLe2He9k8r8WnAnuXJbAUedX8c2HCr8bQ
Yes, thank u.
Money is still there, it's good.
5% for storing your wallet number
They massively improved on the alpha version. zerocash uses SHA256, merkle trees, etc. and seems to be ideal to implement onto NXT
Watching. This indeed looks much better.
Compute time was ~one minute, but that is done by the local client computer, verification time <10 milliseconds
small enough to fit in AM, fast enough for 100 TPS
Whitepaper will be written by univ, professor
reference implementation with source code in May
If we can establish earlier workings with them, that would be much better.
James
The block #53436 contains 65 transactions!
They massively improved on the alpha version. zerocash uses SHA256, merkle trees, etc. and seems to be ideal to implement onto NXT
Watching. This indeed looks much better.
Jump to: