What's wrong with paying people for work?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interest
When you are rewarded for finding a flaw, your monetary incentive is aligned with your actions.
In case of review, it's the opposite.
Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1411. (Read 2761645 times)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_of_interest
When you are rewarded for finding a flaw, your monetary incentive is aligned with your actions.
In case of review, it's the opposite.
could anyone send me some original number puzzles for the conference treasure hunt?
like:
http://www.mathsisfun.com/puzzles/number-puzzles-index.html
The answer would lead to the account with some Nxts..
(if not, I will try to make some..)
like:
Quote
What 5-digit number has the following features:
If we put the numeral 1 at the beginning, we get a number three times smaller than if we put the numeral 1 at the end of the number.
If we put the numeral 1 at the beginning, we get a number three times smaller than if we put the numeral 1 at the end of the number.
http://www.mathsisfun.com/puzzles/number-puzzles-index.html
The answer would lead to the account with some Nxts..
(if not, I will try to make some..)
Daniel J. Bernstein
http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
- it also may mean: "I might respond within a few months, but for $16000 I might respond within a few days" :-)http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
Yeah, it looks like he receives a lot of crap: "please don't send me email of the following types: qmail support questions."
So it'll likely just a way to reduce such e-mails.
Well, he implemented qmail by himself. Don't confuse it with gmail.
Right! I did confuse.
Get quality by monety
That's not how it works in the scientific world. It's customary, practically a requirement, to disclose if your research is affiliated. Not everyone does it, but that's a different story.
So long as this review is paid for, it will always have a "lesser quality" than true, independent review.
Can't we wait until NXT becomes popular enough? Or ask without offering money?
Have you thought that maybe some people refused precisely because of ethical concerns?
And if you do it, at least be damn sure the guy discloses that he was paid, otherwise it will look very shady.
yes, esp. considering that a transfer fee of 1NXT =1GoldOunce is rather .. unsound. Same holds for sending a short text msg - talk about golden words!
Even a minimal fee of 0.01NXT would mean $12 fee at current gold price - So we need to get at least two orders lower with fees to make that feasible ..
Even a minimal fee of 0.01NXT would mean $12 fee at current gold price - So we need to get at least two orders lower with fees to make that feasible ..
Jesus, not the fee talk again.
nope - just putting into perpsective with some hypothetical external gauges
Then we'll make fee 0.000001NXT
Basic questions
Could someone please explain to me how NRS determines the following:
1) Active vs. Known peers (why are some peers "Active" and some just "known"? How is this determined?)
2) Active Connected vs. Active Disconnected (what does "Disconnected" mean? Disconnected from the Nxt network? How is this determined?)
Background to the questions: if you go to https://node2.mynxt.info:7875/ you can't see node1.mynxt.info in the active list. It should be there though because node1.mynxt.info is hallmarked and is online (as you can check by going to https://node1.mynxt.info:7875/). Furthermore, the IP of node1.mynxt.info is in the "well-known" list in node2.mynxt.info web.xml. So why is it not there?
Could someone please explain to me how NRS determines the following:
1) Active vs. Known peers (why are some peers "Active" and some just "known"? How is this determined?)
2) Active Connected vs. Active Disconnected (what does "Disconnected" mean? Disconnected from the Nxt network? How is this determined?)
Background to the questions: if you go to https://node2.mynxt.info:7875/ you can't see node1.mynxt.info in the active list. It should be there though because node1.mynxt.info is hallmarked and is online (as you can check by going to https://node1.mynxt.info:7875/). Furthermore, the IP of node1.mynxt.info is in the "well-known" list in node2.mynxt.info web.xml. So why is it not there?
Anyone? Please?
Daniel J. Bernstein
http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
- it also may mean: "I might respond within a few months, but for $16000 I might respond within a few days" :-)http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
Yeah, it looks like he receives a lot of crap: "please don't send me email of the following types: qmail support questions."
So it'll likely just a way to reduce such e-mails.
Well, he implemented qmail by himself. Don't confuse it with gmail.
yes, esp. considering that a transfer fee of 1NXT =1GoldOunce is rather .. unsound. Same holds for sending a short text msg - talk about golden words!
Even a minimal fee of 0.01NXT would mean $12 fee at current gold price - So we need to get at least two orders lower with fees to make that feasible ..
Even a minimal fee of 0.01NXT would mean $12 fee at current gold price - So we need to get at least two orders lower with fees to make that feasible ..
Jesus, not the fee talk again.
nope - just putting into perpsective with some hypothetical external gauges
Daniel J. Bernstein
http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
- it also may mean: "I might respond within a few months, but for $16000 I might respond within a few days" :-)http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
Who will contact this guy?
please someone with at least a mathematical background. ask ricot maybe.
I also asked someone and he told me to write a paper to specify the security targets.
name conditions X, parameters Y and security target Z.
Daniel J. Bernstein
http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
- it also may mean: "I might respond within a few months, but for $16000 I might respond within a few days" :-)http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
Who will contact this guy?
would like to but my English isnt that good
- it also may mean: "I might respond within a few months, but for $16000 I might respond within a few days" :-)
Doesn't it bother you, guys, that paying a large sum of money for a crypto review is... well... kinda smells bad?
What's wrong with paying people for work?
Also, it's out here in the open, so I fail to see how it could be seen a somehow shady.
If we were to make some kind of alleyway trade with BTC, it would be different.
Daniel J. Bernstein
http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
- it also may mean: "I might respond within a few months, but for $16000 I might respond within a few days" :-)http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
Who will contact this guy?
- it also may mean: "I might respond within a few months, but for $16000 I might respond within a few days" :-)
Doesn't it bother you, guys, that paying a large sum of money for a crypto review is... well... kinda smells bad?
What's wrong with paying people for work?
Daniel J. Bernstein
http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
- it also may mean: "I might respond within a few months, but for $16000 I might respond within a few days" :-)http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
Yeah, it looks like he receives a lot of crap: "please don't send me email of the following types: qmail support questions."
So it'll likely just a way to reduce such e-mails.
Daniel J. Bernstein
http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
- it also may mean: "I might respond within a few months, but for $16000 I might respond within a few days" :-)http://cr.yp.to/contact.html
"You can send me email at [email protected]; I might respond within a few months."
Who will contact this guy?
- it also may mean: "I might respond within a few months, but for $16000 I might respond within a few days" :-)
Doesn't it bother you, guys, that paying a large sum of money for a crypto review is... well... kinda smells bad?
we could also set up a reward of 20 BTC for anyone who finds a flaw in the code and provides mathematical proof.
fek a review... how many adverts could you put on mainstream tv? :L once theres a decent client and its on a couple more exchanges... boom mainstream advertisment.. who needs a review in a conference when you can tell ppl how good it is through the little brainwash box! :L
If I was developer I would like an independent review.
fek a review... how many adverts could you put on mainstream tv? :L once theres a decent client and its on a couple more exchanges... boom mainstream advertisment.. who needs a review in a conference when you can tell ppl how good it is through the little brainwash box! :L
- it also may mean: "I might respond within a few months, but for $16000 I might respond within a few days" :-)
Doesn't it bother you, guys, that paying a large sum of money for a crypto review is... well... kinda smells bad?
Why? Noone is paying him to say "Oh, it's fine, just fine!"
Of course you should pay people for their job. This guy is independent of NXT, he has no reason to spend his time on NXT unless he is compensated for his time.
Jump to: