Redtube and other shit is working, instead of nxtforum 
P.S. I live not in China, but in Europe.
P.S. I live not in China, but in Europe.redtube, too.
TMI
Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 142. (Read 2761645 times)
redtube, too.
TMI
Redtube and other shit is working, instead of nxtforum
P.S. I live not in China, but in Europe.Well, atleast you dont get bored this way
Redtube and other shit is working, instead of nxtforum P.S. I live not in China, but in Europe.
P.S. I live not in China, but in Europe.nxtforum is working for me. redtube, too.
I learned to type on a "typewriter" but I never used *two spaces* so am not sure where that idea came from.
(I am 46 so I guess that makes me a good candidate to be BCNext also)
google "typewriter spaces after period"(I am 46 so I guess that makes me a good candidate to be BCNext also)
http://www.writersdigest.com/online-editor/how-many-spaces-after-a-period
I also have never heard of this rule.
However, being the last year to even get typewriter lessons (and still able to make a magazine using tape and scissors and a Hectograph
) it may be that standards at that time had already slipped.I miss the sound of a typewriter...
Though I come from the post typewriter era, I have heard of this rule. Maybe it's not as universal as I thought, though.
So maybe BCNext is from America? Havent heard from British peoples on the two space rule.
James
P.S. Of course, this could all just be misdirection, but interesting how certain things are "universal" in some parts of the world and unheard of in others
otpkeyprov plugin configuration
otpkeyprov plugin, actually, enter the same secret key both in kee pass as google autenticator .
this is the same passphrase that synchronizes tokens.
I'm not clear if this is a point of trust
google autenticator is a point of trust?
is There a trust third part required??
someone can argue?
Quote
The difficulty arises with the user authenticator Google documentation . One Base32 ( secret ) key is expected . You must set the secret key to Base32 in KeePass and restrict your secret key to the base 32 character set : az, 2-7. KeePass allows "= " but not Google authenticator . Base32 length secret key Apart expressed in multiples of 8 characters.
A configuration that works :
Adjust the settings OTP Lock :
Long: 6
Secret key : abcdefghxz234567 ( Base32 )
Counter : 0 ( Dec)
OTP Number 3
Looking forward 9 (allows 3 failed attempts to unlock using KeePass newly generated OTPs before a recovery is needed because the counters have become too out of sync. )
Set Google Authenticator
secret key : abcdefghxz234567
counter : counter based
The first 6 OTPs are:
442843
724600
994 767
847 513
160505
583 080
Make sure you never lose the secret key or it will be permanently locked out of KeePass if counters lose synchronization. It also recognizes that the real secret is the secret key is not the OTP .
A configuration that works :
Adjust the settings OTP Lock :
Long: 6
Secret key : abcdefghxz234567 ( Base32 )
Counter : 0 ( Dec)
OTP Number 3
Looking forward 9 (allows 3 failed attempts to unlock using KeePass newly generated OTPs before a recovery is needed because the counters have become too out of sync. )
Set Google Authenticator
secret key : abcdefghxz234567
counter : counter based
The first 6 OTPs are:
442843
724600
994 767
847 513
160505
583 080
Make sure you never lose the secret key or it will be permanently locked out of KeePass if counters lose synchronization. It also recognizes that the real secret is the secret key is not the OTP .
Quote
real secret is the secret key is not the OTP
otpkeyprov plugin, actually, enter the same secret key both in kee pass as google autenticator .
this is the same passphrase that synchronizes tokens.
I'm not clear if this is a point of trust
google autenticator is a point of trust?
is There a trust third part required??
someone can argue?
It baffels me that the faucet still has NXT to give :O
That is the NXT community.
Chrome down message: resolving host..., then This webpage is not available
Just tested on chrome, works like a charm. maybe you have some SSL certificates blocked that are not "official" ?
In the morning worked normally, cleared cache, nothing helped. No errors or messages regarding SSL. Very strange
You can always dig out the ol' firefox
My message edited: the same with firefox...
Wow, ok so maybe the server banned your IP (unlikely)
or your ISP fucked with your line?
Very strange indeed
Redtube and other shit is working, instead of nxtforum
P.S. I live not in China, but in Europe. 
I learned to type on a "typewriter" but I never used *two spaces* so am not sure where that idea came from.
(I am 46 so I guess that makes me a good candidate to be BCNext also)
google "typewriter spaces after period"(I am 46 so I guess that makes me a good candidate to be BCNext also)
http://www.writersdigest.com/online-editor/how-many-spaces-after-a-period
I also have never heard of this rule.
However, being the last year to even get typewriter lessons (and still able to make a magazine using tape and scissors and a Hectograph
) it may be that standards at that time had already slipped.I miss the sound of a typewriter...
Though I come from the post typewriter era, I have heard of this rule. Maybe it's not as universal as I thought, though.
Chrome down message: resolving host..., then This webpage is not available
Just tested on chrome, works like a charm. maybe you have some SSL certificates blocked that are not "official" ?
In the morning worked normally, cleared cache, nothing helped. No errors or messages regarding SSL. Very strange
You can always dig out the ol' firefox
My message edited: the same with firefox...
Wow, ok so maybe the server banned your IP (unlikely)
or your ISP fucked with your line?
Very strange indeed
Chrome down message: resolving host..., then This webpage is not available
Just tested on chrome, works like a charm. maybe you have some SSL certificates blocked that are not "official" ?
In the morning worked normally, cleared cache, nothing helped. No errors or messages regarding SSL. Very strange
You can always dig out the ol' firefox
My message edited: the same with firefox...
Chrome down message: resolving host..., then This webpage is not available
Just tested on chrome, works like a charm. maybe you have some SSL certificates blocked that are not "official" ?
In the morning worked normally, cleared cache, nothing helped. No errors or messages regarding SSL. Very strange
You can always dig out the ol' firefox
I've done 4 NXT withdrawals on Cryptsy. 1 took about 2 hours, 2 took about 24 hours each, and 1 took almost a week. the one that took a week was due to a glitch in their (still very new) NXT market. I put in a support ticket after a couple days; they responded quickly and eventually resolved the issue. I used to use Dgex but at this point have switched to Cryptsy for my NXT purchases, and am glad they added NXT. In any case, I wouldn't worry unless the wait is getting significantly longer than 24 hours.
It is unacceptable for longer than twenty-four hours
Good luck to you
Chrome down message: resolving host..., then This webpage is not available
Just tested on chrome, works like a charm. maybe you have some SSL certificates blocked that are not "official" ?
In the morning worked normally, cleared cache, nothing helped. No errors or messages regarding SSL. Very strange
EDIT: tried with firefox, the same problem. Nonsense, but maybe my ISP f..ing DNS matter. All other pages work without any problem.
Chrome down message: resolving host..., then This webpage is not available
Just tested on chrome, works like a charm. maybe you have some SSL certificates blocked that are not "official" ?
It seems that I hadn't paid proper attention about the idea of the random numbers that were being suggested (they are actually hashes of random numbers with the *actual* numbers being delivered later).
I am now starting to warm to the idea (provided that the range of these numbers is large enough - say 64 bit at least).
I am now starting to warm to the idea (provided that the range of these numbers is large enough - say 64 bit at least).
This is one of the ideas: distributing signed hashes into the blocks. This guarantees the correctness of the later-to-be-revealed random numbers (rr).
It is one thing to trust the rr generators, it is another thing to trust the users of these rr.
I am still not convinced that the rr users (probably the forger of the "randomizer block") cannot cheat the system as they could do without it. We are still missing something here.
Chrome down message: resolving host..., then This webpage is not available
When I try to register an alias what do I enter under uri.
Thanks!
Thanks!
If you don't want to add something, keep it empty. Works fine!
Nxt will feature two pages in the book called Cryptocurrency "The Alt-ernative" the Beginner's Reference
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=483187.new#new
Please donate to the below Nxt wallet address in order to help fund this project:
14081530087791934508
It will have 2 pages similar to this:
If you spot any spelling or grammar errors, these are easily sorted. I do have a full time job as well as trying to get this project completed too.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=483187.new#new
Please donate to the below Nxt wallet address in order to help fund this project:
14081530087791934508
It will have 2 pages similar to this:
If you spot any spelling or grammar errors, these are easily sorted. I do have a full time job as well as trying to get this project completed too.
When I try to register an alias what do I enter under uri.
Thanks!
Thanks!
Jump to: