Author

Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 1438. (Read 2761645 times)

sr. member
Activity: 396
Merit: 250
@ forums.nxtcrypto team

I forgot my password. The FAQ says don't worry - resetlink is at the login-screen. No it's not.  Huh No contact info anywhere. Clicking the "team"-link in the bottom requires me to login. I'm pretty stuck, and I need to post in your forum…

Please show me the way, PM me here, so we don't have to polute this thread. NXTers need to talk about the value of money here… ??  Grin
xcn
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
But, unlike DGex, they at least respond to mails..

You're lucky.
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Just like DGEX, Bter wanna hold as much NXT as they can get for (very) long period of time to earn money on transaction fees.
- it seems you are right.  My deposit to BTer from 20.01.2014 17:31:44 was deposited only half an hour ago. And only after 4 mails sent to the support. But, unlike DGex, they at least respond to mails..

As it stands, Bter gain nothing by prolonging the deposit times, since they give everyone an individual deposit address it doesn't benefit them forging-wise until they move it into their main account. Unless I'm missing something here.
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1001
Hey people, how much NEXT will become now its on btr and soon also on cryptsy and others? thanks!

0.00015 within next 10 hours and then back to 0.000085



The first time when my crystal ball said me true  Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 490
Merit: 250
I don't really come from outer space.

https://coinmkt.com/#/deposit

Add Funding Sources -> Bank "Coming Soon"

Cool.  Right now I use Coinbase to get Bitcoin from USD.  It would be great to have another option.


legendary
Activity: 1181
Merit: 1018
I dont seem to see any APIs (at least not listed in the wiki) regarding queries on which assets an account owns, or how many of them your account owns.  Have these just not been documented yet, or are they not in the software?

I think they r not implemented, post in Nxt API thread what requests u need.

- an API which by passing an asset id to show all accounts owning qtys of the asset
- an API which by passing an asset id to show all bid_ask orders for them including account IDs maybe so we can build order book. Maybe to show accout id so one day we can send message to an account an offer some bargain Smiley Also with account id maybe the exchange will be more transperant
- an API which by passing an account id shows all the assets owned by the account

Also unsure if thats doable but could the BID_ASK order has a little Comment? Unsure what it be used for hahah but sounds coool:)



That raises the question:

- is there an API call to implement a MARKET order?

I'll check over at the API thread..
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1038
Just like DGEX, Bter wanna hold as much NXT as they can get for (very) long period of time to earn money on transaction fees.
- it seems you are right.  My deposit to BTer from 20.01.2014 17:31:44 was deposited only half an hour ago. And only after 4 mails sent to the support. But, unlike DGex, they at least respond to mails..
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Hey, they are accepting alts :
Quote
The company is also announcing the addition of three more altcoins to its exchange: Megacoin (MEC), Worldcoin (WDC) and Quark Coin (QRK)

We should push Nxt to this exchange ! It would be much better for them to add Nxt than shitty coins.

I just mailed them to add it.
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1043
:^)
Hi, everyone!

Something is wrong with BTER.COM

60K NXT was sent to bter yesterday, but still not available on balance. blockchain says transfer was successful.
Support haven't answered yet.

Found different posts concerning bter balance problems here at BT.
Seems like they are scamming people.

Edit: my deposit that I sent about 9 hours ago just came through.

Just like DGEX, Bter wanna hold as much NXT as they can get for (very) long period of time to earn money on transaction fees.

first of all id like to report that i have been forging with 5.5 client for a week now and no errors and no restart was needed but no blocks were generated with about 150k. normal ?

No one should be using anything but 0.5.9 now!

The Transparent Forging phase 2 will be activated at block 47000 which is approaching. Those still using older versions will be left out on a fork. Those using 0.5.7 are broadcasting malformed blocks and transactions and will be blacklisted. 0.5.8 is ok, but 0.5.9 is much more stable, there is no excuse not to upgrade.

I reserve the right to run 0.6.0 myself.


the excuse is that we have a life too and work and families and we can't log every 2h to update the client that is not backwards compatible.
this only happens with nxt almost all other clients and software for that matter can "last" more than 2 weeks without "urgent need to upgrade otherwise you get blacklisted and forked".

Having a normal life and participating in a groundbreaking almost alpha-stage (something) never worked well and it never will.

0.5.9 is available since 19-Jan-2014 11:05, 0.5.8 is available since 16-Jan-2014 20:06. It is nowhere near "every 2h to update".
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1131
Hey, they are accepting alts :
Quote
The company is also announcing the addition of three more altcoins to its exchange: Megacoin (MEC), Worldcoin (WDC) and Quark Coin (QRK)

We should push Nxt to this exchange ! It would be much better for them to add Nxt than shitty coins.
member
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
I dont seem to see any APIs (at least not listed in the wiki) regarding queries on which assets an account owns, or how many of them your account owns.  Have these just not been documented yet, or are they not in the software?

I think they r not implemented, post in Nxt API thread what requests u need.

- an API which by passing an asset id to show all accounts owning qtys of the asset
- an API which by passing an asset id to show all bid_ask orders for them including account IDs maybe so we can build order book. Maybe to show accout id so one day we can send message to an account an offer some bargain Smiley Also with account id maybe the exchange will be more transperant
- an API which by passing an account id shows all the assets owned by the account

Also unsure if thats doable but could the BID_ASK order has a little Comment? Unsure what it be used for hahah but sounds coool:)
hero member
Activity: 586
Merit: 501
first of all id like to report that i have been forging with 5.5 client for a week now and no errors and no restart was needed but no blocks were generated with about 150k. normal ?

No one should be using anything but 0.5.9 now!

The Transparent Forging phase 2 will be activated at block 47000 which is approaching. Those still using older versions will be left out on a fork. Those using 0.5.7 are broadcasting malformed blocks and transactions and will be blacklisted. 0.5.8 is ok, but 0.5.9 is much more stable, there is no excuse not to upgrade.

I reserve the right to run 0.6.0 myself.


the excuse is that we have a life too and work and families and we can't log every 2h to update the client that is not backwards compatible.
this only happens with nxt almost all other clients and software for that matter can "last" more than 2 weeks without "urgent need to upgrade otherwise you get blacklisted and forked".

legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
Hi, everyone!

Something is wrong with BTER.COM

60K NXT was sent to bter yesterday, but still not available on balance. blockchain says transfer was successful.
Support haven't answered yet.

Found different posts concerning bter balance problems here at BT.

Edit: my deposit that I sent about 9 hours ago just came through.


Balance at BTER.COM just updated, containing all my transferred funds!
Maybe they read this thread?

Good to know! Smiley
xcn
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Hi, everyone!

Something is wrong with BTER.COM

60K NXT was sent to bter yesterday, but still not available on balance. blockchain says transfer was successful.
Support haven't answered yet.

Found different posts concerning bter balance problems here at BT.

Edit: my deposit that I sent about 9 hours ago just came through.


Balance at BTER.COM just updated, containing all my transferred funds!
Maybe they read this thread?
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
oops - is the testnet down, or is it just me bumbling around with the cloudapp link? Had my computer on standby overnight, but I don't seem to be able to re-establish connection to http://[Suspicious link removed]/3B0Z0U0C2n0D / http://holms.cloudapp.net:6874/

It's down. Let's wait for klee.
Skype..
hero member
Activity: 840
Merit: 1000
Hi, everyone!

Something is wrong with BTER.COM

60K NXT was sent to bter yesterday, but still not available on balance. blockchain says transfer was successful.
Support haven't answered yet.

Found different posts concerning bter balance problems here at BT.
Seems like they are scamming people.

Edit: my deposit that I sent about 9 hours ago just came through.
xcn
newbie
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
Hi, everyone!

Something is wrong with BTER.COM

60K NXT was sent to bter yesterday, but still not available on balance. blockchain says transfer was successful.
Support haven't answered yet.

Found different posts concerning bter balance problems here at BT.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100

V0.5.9 Client got error after two days running.

Code:
[2014-01-20 09:33:45.146] NRS 0.5.9 started successfully.
[2014-01-21 22:00:51.223] Re-scanning blockchain...
[2014-01-21 22:00:57.832] ...Done
[2013-01-22 10:19:34.646] DEBUG: Error sending JSON request
java.io.IOException: Error writing to server
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.writeRequests(Unknown Sou
rce)
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.writeRequests(Unknown Sou
rce)
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(Unknown So
urce)
        at java.net.HttpURLConnection.getResponseCode(Unknown Source)
        at Nxt$Peer.send(Nxt.java:3595)
        at Nxt$Peer.send(Nxt.java:3556)
        at Nxt$7.run(Nxt.java:6301)
        at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
access$301(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
run(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
[2013-01-22 10:28:42.212] DEBUG: Error sending JSON request
java.io.IOException: Error writing to server
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.writeRequests(Unknown Sou
rce)
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.writeRequests(Unknown Sou
rce)
        at sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(Unknown So
urce)
        at java.net.HttpURLConnection.getResponseCode(Unknown Source)
        at Nxt$Peer.send(Nxt.java:3595)
        at Nxt$Peer.send(Nxt.java:3556)
        at Nxt$Peer.connect(Nxt.java:3270)
        at Nxt$2.run(Nxt.java:6094)
        at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
access$301(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
run(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
        at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
legendary
Activity: 866
Merit: 1002
It seems that Jaguar's implementation is the only one that achieved the 100TPS. Is this true? No offense to the others,but would there be a reason for people to use the slower versions?
I might have misunderstood the benchmarks in that thread as I didn't find any benchmarks of all four on the same computer

What you don't see in the scores, is that there was both rivalry and cooperation.
I think hoax was the first one to have fastest implementation.
Jaguar's initial trials were quite slow, and his approach changed after tips from both hoax (drop long) and BloodyRookie (switch to 16bit math).
Also BloodyRookie probably nailed down the problem in math behind Curve.sign, which probably deserves separte credit itself: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.4645132

I was bit late t the party, I joined when I've seen info in "flaws" thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=397183.1080
The only credit I think I can give to myself is "hinting", what's up with magic is_negative...

Still, we all have spent fair amount of time working on this
Jump to: