Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information - page 167. (Read 2761645 times)

Report bug...

I have tried to forge with two accounts at the same peer, after ~3 hours, the problem happened.

(Image of my control panel, in Spanish, the getState return.)

There is NOTHING in the logs, indicating that failed.


If only forged an only account, the peer may be undefined online without freezing.

Regards!

That is much more expensive than I expected.

I've sent 2000 NXT to your itty-bitty 2319251 address to help pay for a wildcard SSL cert. (txid 4585985331078069817)

Hopefully, others will be inclined to do the same.  We only need a hand-full of people, say around 7 or so, to do the same and the cost should be covered.

Everyone just RELAX!

This is not a big deal. 1 wrong sentence in an hour long episode.

Peter Todd probably has not looked into Nxt that much, and ASSUMED that it was like other POS coins.

It was probably an honest mistake.

The way to handle it, if you want to, is to write him a POLITE note telling him why he is mistaken. Then in the future he won't say such things. I really doubt he's trying to smear Nxt or anything sinister.

Sorry, but as long as this forum does not have ssl, I wont go there.

Call me paranoid, but I don't send my email nor any password as plain text over the inet...

OK, everybody, your favorite dictator rickyjames here, flapping my gums wildly once more.

We've coming up on 2500 pages on this Bitcointalk thread.  What an accomplishment!!!  Woo Hoo!!!

We have a new forum that is Our Very Own at nxtforum.org .   Go ahead, enter it into your address bar of your browser, it works and it's a Simple Machine forum just like this one at Bitcointalk.  You'll feel right at home.

I've created a thread there called NXT Pub Thread - 2500 More Pages Here Or Bust

http://107.170.117.237/index.php/topic,91.0.html

I propose that 2Kool lock this thread at page 2500 and we do a mass migration over there.

It would be nice, neat, poetic closure.  And a new beginning.

Like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUQbLz7AoYc

C'mon, everybody.  Think Nike.  Just do it.

Hey community,

I have some parts arriving the next days to build 5 RasPI-Solar Nodes. Pls remember, the RasPI is a dev board, also is my RasPI-Solar setup! It is not a customer product!

Price will be ~200€  had no time to calculate correctly. Marketing people that need one for the conferences will be prioritised.
Li-ion batteries will not be included! Pls make sure you can buy these batteries -> https://www.akkuteile.de/lithium-ionen-akkus/18650/panasonic/panasonic-ncr18650b-3-6v-3400mah/a-100639/

Package will include:
- Plastic Box A4 sized
- Solar panel 1.5Ampere
- Solar Charger
- Battery holder

Optional:
- RasPI model A + Wlan adaptor + sd card 4GB (bigger sd card size possible)
- External modification to archive lowest current consumption. No loss of rasPI warranty! Only for technican ppl.

Warranty!!!:
This is my private effort to the community! I can not give any warranty to any pice of this setup. If you want the optional RasPI model A you will get a copy of the shops invoice and you have to deal with them on your own! Everything is tested befor it leaves my hands!

Private shipping from Germany, only to Europe for the moment.

If you need everything setup like Raspian, latest NRS and Wlan configured, it will cost some NXT extra 


If you are interested, pls send me a PM. If I accept your order, I will PM you back. I can not guarantee on time delivery, because of my day job and family! But it should ship in 2 weeks from my accepted build via PM.

It will look like this one:


Some more pics from my prototype:
http://imgur.com/zFJAnzw,zhN1Ny5,VD5oaiz,S6fpGe3,w6mfMfY,r3FPKuD,yD9lncP,8Y7VVXb


Parts for 4 of 5 available.
1 Order already accepted! For Amsterdam conference.

Greets,
eb

Could someone please send some testnet NXT to the following address:
4874805052937677329

Thank you very much!

I find it is kinder to apply Hanlon's Razor to all communications (even Emule's.)

I'm going wherever the discussion is certainly, but I'm curious..  why the move?


This will be awesome if this is the last message ever in the thread.   lol

I am with you. Now you can see how decentralized we are while he accused us centralized. Maybe once the FT get more implemented, people will get better understanding about Nxt.

NaCL has a C implementation of SHA256.  See http://nacl.cr.yp.to/hash.html

Woohoo! That is all I can say.

CfB might still post here, but he is also registered over there, as is Jean Luc 

No worries!
We are making quite a smooth transfer at the moment.

How many posts per day/hour do we need to keep this top of the altcoin board here on bct?

We could double post marketing, news, critical emule updates etc here to keep the thread top and get to have a shiny new forum too.

Best of both worlds? 

I am back working on Daedelus' personal notebook the Nxt Wiki Glossary tommorow so prepare to be spammed...

Goodnight

Nxt community might have been ready to do this. But you still need to persuade CFB to make the change. I don't know how he feel about it. I hope he will give it a try.

Nxt CPU - Cryptocurrency Processing Unit

Silver is still waiting for you.

3D printed pendant in action:

PICTURE: Blue colored nylon plastic


PICTURE: Coral Red colored nylon plastic

it is interesting for different reasons - right now this video is super-boring for me, because we already have this and I have spent a lot of attention to mesh networks here: http://justpaste.it/nxt-decentralized-internet (Fiber optic cables are addition by NxtMinnow).

So the guy is like prehistoric talking for me. BUT - he was telling to the audience about something new. So the interesting part is - how he decided to do that. By 10 minutes faery tale and 5 minutes of very uncertain datas. No techbullshits

Sorry to keep bugging you, but due to the possibility of multiple txid having the same hash, I think I need to verify that all tx's that I honor, not have a duplicate hash.

I see no way of doing this, short of tracking all transactions. If I use getAccountTransactions, then wouldnt I miss hash conflicts between txids in different subsets of what getAccountTransactions returns? Maybe there is a way to know for sure that all possible hash conflicts are contained within a certain set of filtered getAccountTransactions txids. I dont understand this well enough to know anything, other than I dont understand it well enough...

Maybe it is as simple as the fake transaction, has to be identical in all respects other than the signature. So maybe every filtered subset is the spanning set for itself, actually every isolated tx could be. However, if that was the case, then I am not sure I need to do an hash based error checking as I am assuming the NXT core is doing this now.

Any guidance is appreciated.

James

Im waiting on root access and I will fix it

Could you put that here, please? http://107.170.117.237/index.php/board,34.0.html

Otherwise we might miss it tomorrow (it's night where we are)